Female sexual dysfunctions: an overview on the available therapeutic interventions.

INTRODUCTION: There are different types of female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs), and FSD in general has a high prevalence worldwide. Studies of FSD should consider it as a multifactorial disorder that has biological, psychological, environmental, and relational aspects. In this review we discuss the available therapeutic interventions for FSD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: For the current narrative review the PubMed database was searched to identify all publications up to 30 March 2021 that were systematic reviews and meta-analyses which examined therapeutic interventions for FSDs based on the diagnostic classifications of ICD-10 and ICD-11. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirty systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in this review. Hormone therapy (HT) and testosterone are effective to improve sexual desire in menopausal women. In these women HT and ospemiphene may improve pain during intercourse. Flibanserin may improve sexual desire and may reduce desire-related distress in premenopausal women. Bremelanotide is effective to improve desire, arousal, and orgasm scores. Evidence are still limited on the efficacy of psychoactive drugs, phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), oxytocin, herbal drugs, and tibolone to treat FSDs. Psychological interventions such as cognitive-behavior therapy, mindfulness training, sensate focus, bibliotherapy are effective for the management of several different FSDs. CONCLUSIONS: The management of FSDs may require multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions appears to have potential as a treatment for FSDs, but there are currently no gold standards regarding recommended treatment modalities, and the duration, frequency, and intensity of therapy sessions.

The effects of bethanechol and cisapride on urodynamic parameters in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

To evaluate the effects of bethanechol and cisapride on urodynamic parameters in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 79 patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive bethanechol (30 mg/day), cisapride (30 mg/day), bethanechol combined with cisapride (same doses) and placebo. Urodynamic study was performed, including flowmetry, cystometry, pressure-flow study and urethral pressure profile before radical hysterectomy. Medication was administered postoperatively during 30 days. At the end of this period, urodynamic evaluation was repeated. There was an increase in both the maximum cystometric capacity and bladder capacity at first desire to void in the placebo group compared to the other groups. The rate of detrusor instability was higher in the group that used bethanechol combined with cisapride. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow was significantly higher when cisapride was used. There was a significant increase in postvoid residual volume in the placebo group. In patients undergoing radical hysterectomy, bethanechol and cisapride determined lower cystometric capacity and decreased bladder capacity at first desire to void, a higher maximum flow rate and higher detrusor pressure at maximum flow, with lower postvoid residual volumes. The early use of bethanechol and cisapride after radical hysterectomies positively modified urodynamic parameters, determining a more efficient detrusor function.