Confirmatory validation of the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients: A brief patient-reported outcome measure assessing psychological distress in malignant mesothelioma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Psychological suffering in patients with Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) is different from the one experienced by patients with other cancers due to its occupational or environmental etiology and its peculiar symptomatology and prognosis (i.e., poor prognosis, reduced effectiveness of the therapies, poor quality of residual life, and advanced age at the time of diagnosis). Therefore, the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients (MPDT-P) has been developed to evaluate the specific profile of psychological suffering in this population. This paper describes the item selection, factor analysis, and psychometric evaluation of the revised MPDT-P. METHODS: The analyses of the current work aimed to confirm the factorial structure found in the first version of the MPDT-P. In the case of nonfit, it aimed to find an alternative structure and causes of nonfit in the model. The search for the fit of the factorial model was conducted using a Bayesian approach. RESULTS: The two-factor model reported in the first version of the instrument did not fit the data. Confirmatory Bayesian analyses showed adequate fit for the three-factor solution. Based on the content of the items, we labeled the factors as dysfunctional emotions, claims for justice, and anxieties about the future. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating the MPDT-P into clinical practice could help clinicians gain insight into the specific suffering related to MM and investigate potential differences related to different occupational and environmental exposure contexts.

Survival of Patients with Sinonasal Cancers in a Population-Based Registry, Lombardy, Italy, 2008-2023.

Sinonasal cancers (SNCs) are rare malignancies associated with occupational exposures. The aim of this study was to analyse the survival of SNC patients using data from the population-based SNC registry of the Lombardy region (10 million people), Italy. We included epithelial SNC cases registered in 2008-2020 and followed-up for vital status until 31 July 2023. Multivariate flexible parametric models with time-dependent covariates were fitted to calculate excess hazard ratios (EHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of death. Based on 827 cases (553 males, 274 females) and 514 deaths (345 males, 169 females), the 5-year observed survival was 49% and the net survival was 57%. Age had a substantial impact on survival, particularly within the first year (EHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12-1.51 per 10 years). Compared with the nasal cavity, the EHR for paranasal sinuses was 4.70 (95% CI, 2.96-7.47) soon after diagnosis. Compared with squamous cell carcinomas, the EHR was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52-0.91) for adenocarcinomas, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.20-2.35) for undifferentiated and unspecified carcinomas, and 1.78 (95% CI, 1.07-2.95) for neuroendocrine carcinomas. Age and cancer site showed time-dependent effects on prognosis, especially within the first month after diagnosis. Prognosis was also markedly affected by cancer morphology. No associations were found for gender and period of diagnosis.

Second Primary Cancers in a Population-Based Mesothelioma Registry.

BACKGROUND: The presence of a second primary cancer (SPC) in patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) may impact overall survival and suggest a common mechanism of carcinogenesis or an underlying germline genetic alteration. METHODS: We evaluated the occurrence of SPCs within PM cases collected from 2000 to 2018 by the Lombardy Mesothelioma Registry and their prognostic implications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate median survival times, together with univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of death. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) of the entire study population (N = 6646) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 10.4-11.2); patient age and histotype were the strongest prognostic factors. No substantial survival difference was observed by the presence of an SPC (10.5 months in 1000 patients with an SPC vs. 10.9 months in 5646 patients in the non-SPC group, HR 1.03, p = 0.40). Shorter OS in the SPC group was only observed in 150 patients with the non-epithelioid subtype (median OS of 5.4 vs. 7.1 months, HR 1.21, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of an SPC did not influence the outcome of PM patients in the overall study population but was associated with shorter OS in non-epithelioid cases. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of SPCs as markers of genetic susceptibility in mesothelioma.