Comparison of propofol with propofol-remifentanil sedation for third molar extraction / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective: To compare the sedation induced by target-controlled infusion of propofol with that by propofol-remifentanil in third molar exaction surgery. Methods: 60 patients for third molar exaction were divided randomly into 2 groups(n = 30): group P(propofol group) and group PR(propofol-remifentanil group). In group P,a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the OAA/S score had reached level 3 in the patients,then the surgery began. In group PR,a infusion of remifentanil with a target plasma concentration of 1 ng /ml and a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the OAA/S score had reached level 3,then the surgery began. In all patients,the heart rate,blood pressure,respiratory rate,oxyhemoglobin saturation and narcotrend index were recorded during the operation. The reactions of the patients in the operation were recorded. The satisfaction of the patients and surgeons was asked. Results: The respiratory rate and the oxyhemoglobin saturation in group PR was lower than those in group P(P ＜ 0. 05). No obvious adverse reaction was observed in the 2 groups. The satisfaction of the patients in the 2 groups was 30 /30 and 30 /30(P＞ 0. 05). Conclusion: The sedation induced by target-controlled infusion of propofol or propofol-remifentanil in third molar extraction is safe. The sedation under target-controlled infusion of propofol-remifentanil is better than that by propofol when inhalating oxygen.

[Comparison between propofol and propofol-remifentanil sedation under target-controlled infusion for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children].

Objective The aim of this study is to compare sedation titrated under target-controlled infusion of propofol and propofol-remifentanil for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children. Methods A total of 60 children with anterior maxillary region impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery were divided randomly into two groups, namely, propofol group (group P, n=30) and propofol-remifentanil group (group PR, n=30). In group P, a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale reached level 3 before the actual surgery. In group PR, a remifentanil infusion with a target plasma concentration of 1 ng·mL⁻¹ was started until the operation was finished. A titrated infusion of propofol was also started until the modified OAA/S score reached level 3 before the actual surgery. The Houpt behavior scale was adopted to evaluate the cooperation of each patient in both groups. The heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and Narcotrend index, complications, adverse reactions and propofol infusion of all patients were recorded during the operation. Results The Houpt behavior scales in group PR were better than those in group P (P<0.05). The oxyhemoglobin saturation and respiratory rate in group PR were lower than that in group P (P<0.05). The heart rate, blood pressure and NI in two groups were no significant difference (P>0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression and anterograde amnesia in group PR were higher than that in group P (P<0.05). Conclusion Sedation titrated under the target-controlled infusion of propofol and that titrated under propofol-remifentanil for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children are safe. The sedation titrated under target-controlled infusion of propofol-remifentanil is better than sedation by propofol when inhaling oxygen.

The influence of isoflurane on excitatory amino acid and cerebral oxygen supply consumption during cardiopulmonary bypass / 中华麻醉学杂志

0.05). But the CaO2-CjO2 and jugular vein Glu level at D in group I were significantly lower than those at D in group C. In group C CaO2-CjO2 and jugular vein glutamate level at D were significantly higher than those at B (P