Clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with carcinomatous meningitis secondary to breast cancer.

Prognosis in patients with carcinomatous meningitis (CM) is poor, and numerous prognostic factors for response and survival have been described, but remain controversial. In general, series are small and involve a heterogeneous type of solid neoplasms. The purpose of this study was to describe a series of patients with breast cancer-associated CM to determine the clinical features and prognostic factors associated with survival. We conducted a retrospective study on 49 patients diagnosed between January 2003 and December 2007 at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City. CSF cytopathology samples were re-reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) for patients with breast cancer with CM was 7 weeks. Factors independently associated with better OS included absence of encephalopathy at diagnosis (11 weeks versus 1 week; p = .036), low CSF protein content (15 versus 5 weeks; p = .022), and nontriple-negative receptor status in the primary breast cancer tumor (13 versus 3 weeks; p = .015). According to multivariate analysis, patients were divided into favorable and poor prognostic groups, with OS of 14 weeks and 2 weeks, respectively (p < .001). These factors can identify a subgroup of patients who are candidates for an intensive management approach.

Evaluation of a fully automated method for the determination of sirolimus.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) is a macrocyclic lactone, indicated for prevention of organ rejection after kidney transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring of this agent constitutes an important part to immunosuppressive treatment because of its narrow window of therapeutic efficacy. Routine methods include manual pretreatment of samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of an automated immunoassay that does not require manual pretreatment to quantify SRL in whole blood on the Dimension analyzer. METHODS: We examined 50 whole blood samples collected routinely from kidney transplant patients treated with SRL. The samples were analyzed simultaneously by an immunoassay on an IMx analyzer (reference method), which requires manual pretreatment step versus a totally automated immunoassay on the Dimension analyzer, which does not require this pretreatment. RESULTS: The Dimension SRL assay had a functional sensitivity of ≤2.4 ng/mL. Total imprecision was 15.6% at a concentration of 2.8 ng/mL; 10% at 7.9 ng/mL; and 5.2% at 18.4 ng/mL. Least-squares linear regression analysis yielded an r-value of 0.973 with the following equation: SRL-D=1.204*SRL-IMx-0.251. Bland-Altman comparison showed a mean positive difference of 1.38 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, -1.10 to 3.82), namely, 17.2% for SRL Dimension. The Dimension assay to monitor SRL concentrations was an acceptable method for routine clinical use, with total assay imprecision (%CV) ranging from 10.0% to 5.2% within and above the therapeutic concentration range, respectively. CONCLUSION: SRL IMx and Sirolimus Dimension methods show a good correlation (r=0.973), but the SRL Dimension method demonstrated a positive average difference of 17.2% compared with the IMx method. The Dimension assay to monitor whole blood SRL concentration does not require a manual pretreatment step, reducing turnaround time and making this method an attractive alternative for SRL analysis.