Percepción de los profesionales médicos respecto la adherencia terapéutica de los pacientes con osteoporosis / Medical professionals’ perceptions regarding therapeutic adherence in patients with osteoporosis

Introducción: La adherencia al tratamiento oral del paciente con osteoporosis es baja, con un alto porcentaje de abandonos durante el primer año. La consecuencia más notable es la falta de respuesta terapéutica. Objetivo: Conocer la percepción de los facultativos involucrados en el abordaje del paciente osteoporótico en relación a la adherencia terapéutica de estos pacientes. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal realizado mediante una encuesta de opinión dirigida a médicos de Atención Primaria y Atención Especializada involucrados en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. Los participantes fueron seleccionados mediante muestreo intencionado. Resultados: El cuestionario fue contestado por 235 especialistas de Reumatología (54,5%), Traumatología (10,6%) y Atención Primaria (18,7%). En opinión del 43,8% de los encuestados, más de un 25% de los pacientes olvida alguna vez tomar el tratamiento. Según el 34,9%, más de 75% de los pacientes están concienciados con el tratamiento. Los efectos secundarios y la complejidad de la administración son las razones mayoritarias que propician un cambio de medicación, con una importancia media de 7,94±2,06 y 6±2,01 puntos respectivamente en una escala 0-10. Conclusiones: Los facultativos percibieron baja adherencia terapéutica asociada fundamentalmente a los efectos secundarios, a la polimedicación y a la falta de comunicación entre profesionales. Espaciar la dosificación y el uso de formas galénicas solubles podrían ser opciones para facilitar la adherencia del paciente al tratamiento con bisfosfonatos orales. Mejorar la educación sobre la importancia de la enfermedad o aumentar el seguimiento del paciente serían algunos de los aspectos que podrían favorecer la adherencia terapéutica (AU)

Introduction: Adherence to oral treatment of patients with osteoporosis is low, with a high dropout rate in the first year. The most noteworthy result is the lack of therapeutic response. Objective: To ascertain the perception of physicians working with osteoporotic patients regarding adherence of these patients. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted by opinion survey aimed at primary care physicians and specialists involved in osteoporosis treatment. Participants were selected by purposive sampling. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 235 specialists encompassing rheumatology (54.5%), orthopedics (10.6%) and primary care (18.7%). In 43.8% of participants, more than 25% of patients sometimes forget to take their treatment. According to 34.9%, more than 75% of patients are aware of treatment. Side effects and management complexity are the majority reasons that lead to a change in medication, mean value of 7.94±2.06 6±2.01 points respectively on a 0-10 scale. Conclusions: Overall, medical specialists attributed low adherence to side effects, polypharmacy and lack of communication between professionals. Dosage and space use of soluble dosage forms may be options to facilitate patient adherence to treatment with oral bisphosphonates. Improved education concerning the importance of the disease or increased patient monitoring could foster adherence (AU)

Therapeutic inertia in hypercholesterolaemia is associated with ischaemic events in primary care patients. A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of therapeutic inertia (TI) is very high in the management of vascular risk factors, although its impact on the incidence of ischaemic events is not well-established. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between TI in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia and the appearance of ischaemic events. METHODS: An observational, multicentre, case-control study was conducted in 70 primary care centres in Spain. Case subjects (n = 235) were high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients (both genders, ≥ 18 years) who had had a first event in the 12 months prior to recruitment. They were matched with 235 controls (by vascular risk, age and gender). The observation period was 18 months prior to the onset of a first event (cases) or to date of recruitment (control subjects). RESULTS: The TI in the basal visit (an average of 7.8 months before the event) was slightly higher in cases than in controls (39.7% vs. 34.8%, NS). However, the accumulated TI was similar in both groups (70.7% for cases and 73.95% for controls, NS). The multivariate analysis, taking ischaemic events as the dependent variable, showed that the TI at baseline visit was significantly associated with the development of the event [OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04-4.51), p < 0.05]. Other variables also associated with the ischaemic event were a family history of premature vascular disease [OR 3.38 (95% CI 1.35-8.49), p < 0.05] and uncontrolled hypertension [OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.02-5.43), p < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The TI in high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients in primary prevention in Spanish primary care centres doubled the risk of an ischaemic event in the short term.