Selección del mejor lugar de estimulación tras cirugía cardiaca evaluando la asincronía con strain tras diferentes estimulaciones / Selecting the best site for pacing leads after cardiac surgery by evaluating the asynchrony of myocardial deformation observed with different pacing sites

Introducción y objetivos. Implantar electrodos transitorios en ventrículo derecho (VD) tras cirugía cardiaca es habitual. El objetivo es estudiar en pacientes intervenidos el efecto de la estimulación en diferentes localizaciones ventriculares en la sincronía, analizando la deformación miocárdica (strain), y en la eficacia cardiaca. Métodos. En 19 pacientes se midió la asincronía interventricular (diferencia en el tiempo al comienzo del strain entre VD y ventrículo izquierdo [VI]: TE DI) y la intraventricular (desviación estándar [TE DE] y máxima diferencia en el tiempo de comienzo del strain en las seis caras del VI [TE MD]). Estas estimaciones y el gasto cardiaco (GC) mediante Doppler se determinaron tras la estimulación en VD en tres diferentes segmentos del VI. Resultados. La estimulación en VD fue la que más aumentó los parámetros de asincronía respecto al estudio basal: TE DI, 59,8 ± 40,5 frente a 28,23 ± 56,9 ms (p = 0,002); TE DE, 53,2 ± 34,4 frente a 36,6 ± 34,9 ms (p = 0,007); TE MD, 135,3 ± 82,9 frente a 90,5 ± 87,4 ms (p = 0,007). La estimulación en VI produjo menos asincronía (estimulación en segmento anterior del VI: TE DI, 17,2 ± 53,8 ms; TE DE, 35,8 ± 17,9 ms; TE MD, 91,3 ± 45,2 ms (sin significación estadística respecto a basal). El GC tras la estimulación en VD fue menor que tras estimulación en la cara anterior del VI: 4,36 ± 1 frente a 4,7 ± 1 (p = 0,001). Conclusiones. La estimulación en VI produce menos asincronía que en VD. Asimismo, la estimulación en la cara anterior del VI consigue mayor GC que la estimulación en VD. Estos datos indican que se debería modificar la localización de los electrodos transitorios tras cirugía cardiaca (AU)

Introduction and objectives. After cardiac surgery, temporary pacing leads are routinely implanted in the right ventricle (RV). The objective was to investigate the effect of different ventricular pacing locations on cardiac synchrony (by evaluating myocardial deformation, or strain) and efficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods. Interventricular asynchrony (i.e. the difference in the time of onset of deformation between right and left ventricles; TE-R/L) and intraventricular asynchrony (i.e. the standard deviation and maximum difference in the time of onset of deformation in six segments of the left ventricle [LV]; TE-SD and TE-MD, respectively) were assessed in 19 patients. Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate these parameters and cardiac output after pacing in the RV and in three different LV segments. Results. Pacing in the RV resulted in the greatest increases in asynchrony parameters from baseline: TE- R/L 59.8 ms (standard deviation [SD] 40.5 ms) vs. 28.23 ms (SD 56.9 ms), P=.002; TE-SD 53.2 ms (SD 34.4 ms) vs. 36.6 ms (SD 34.9 ms), P=.007; and TE-MD 135.3 ms (SD 82.9 ms) vs. 90.5 ms (SD 87.4 ms), P=.007. Pacing in the LV resulted in less asynchrony: for anterior LV pacing, TE-R/L was 17.2 ms (SD 53.8 ms), TE-SD was 35.8 ms (SD 17.9 ms), and TE-MD was 91.3 ms (SD 45.2). The change from baseline was not significant. Cardiac output was lower after RV pacing than after anterior LV pacing: 4.36 (SD 1) vs. 4.70 (SD 1); P=.001. Conclusions. Pacing in the LV produced less asynchrony than RV pacing. In addition, anterior LV pacing resulted in a higher cardiac output than RV pacing. These findings suggest that the location normally used for temporary leads after cardiac surgery should be changed (AU)

Selecting the best site for pacing leads after cardiac surgery by evaluating the asynchrony of myocardial deformation observed with different pacing sites.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: After cardiac surgery, temporary pacing leads are routinely implanted in the right ventricle (RV). The objective was to investigate the effect of different ventricular pacing locations on cardiac synchrony (by evaluating myocardial deformation, or strain) and efficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Interventricular asynchrony (i.e. the difference in the time of onset of deformation between right and left ventricles; Tε-R/L) and intraventricular asynchrony (i.e. the standard deviation and maximum difference in the time of onset of deformation in six segments of the left ventricle [LV]; Tε-SD and Tε-MD, respectively) were assessed in 19 patients. Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate these parameters and cardiac output after pacing in the RV and in three different LV segments. RESULTS: Pacing in the RV resulted in the greatest increases in asynchrony parameters from baseline: Tε-R/L 59.8 ms (standard deviation [SD] 40.5 ms) vs. 28.23 ms (SD 56.9 ms), P=.002; Tε-SD 53.2 ms (SD 34.4 ms) vs. 36.6 ms (SD 34.9 ms), P=.007; and Tε-MD 135.3 ms (SD 82.9 ms) vs. 90.5 ms (SD 87.4 ms), P=.007. Pacing in the LV resulted in less asynchrony: for anterior LV pacing, Tε-R/L was 17.2 ms (SD 53.8 ms), Tε-SD was 35.8 ms (SD 17.9 ms), and Tε-MD was 91.3 ms (SD 45.2). The change from baseline was not significant. Cardiac output was lower after RV pacing than after anterior LV pacing: 4.36 (SD 1) vs. 4.70 (SD 1); P=.001. CONCLUSIONS: Pacing in the LV produced less asynchrony than RV pacing. In addition, anterior LV pacing resulted in a higher cardiac output than RV pacing. These findings suggest that the location normally used for temporary leads after cardiac surgery should be changed.