Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 136(4): 461e-473e, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26397265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The authors previously described the generation of vascularized bone in a pig model, using a hemimandibular allograft scaffold, adipose-derived stem cells, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, and periosteum. This study tests the hypothesis that this "allograft revitalization" technique is as effective as vascularized autograft for repairing critical bony defects. METHODS: Three groups of pigs had 3-cm defects created in their bilateral tibial diaphyses for repair using rigid fixation and one of three modalities. Negative control tibias were repaired with allograft tibia alone. To simulate repair using vascularized autograft, the osteotomized bone in positive control animals was left in situ, with the posterior periosteum intact. Experimental animals' defects were repaired with allograft tibia packed with autologous adipose-derived stem cells and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, with native periosteum intact. After 8 weeks, unilateral midgraft osteotomies were performed to assess graft healing potential. Serial radiographs and terminal micro-computed tomography and histology enabled evaluation of healing. RESULTS: At week 7 after ostectomy, no negative control tibias had healed (zero of six) whereas most positive control (five of six) and all experimental tibias (six of six) had healed. Unilateral midgraft osteotomies were performed at 8 weeks to assess graft ability to heal. As expected, no negative control tibias (three of three) had radiographic union 7 weeks later. However, all positive control (two of two; p = 0.05) and experimental (three of three; p = 0.01) tibias had healed their repeated osteotomies by this time. CONCLUSION: Similar to vascularized autograft, revitalized allograft successfully repaired a critical tibial defect, including after refracture, suggesting that this technique may be an alternative to osseous free flaps.


Assuntos
Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/uso terapêutico , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Periósteo/transplante , Tíbia/transplante , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/uso terapêutico , Animais , Feminino , Osteotomia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Suínos , Tíbia/lesões , Tíbia/cirurgia , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 72(5): 1000.e1-11, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24742484

RESUMO

PURPOSE: "Allograft revitalization" is a process in which cadaveric bone is used to generate well-vascularized living bone. We had previously found that porcine allograft hemimandibles filled with autologous adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-soaked absorbable collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) were completely replaced by vascularized bone, provided the construct had been incubated within a periosteal envelope. The present study sought to deepen our understanding of allograft revitalization by investigating the individual contributions of ASCs and rhBMP-2 in the process and the mechanical properties of the revitalized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Porcine allograft hemimandible constructs were implanted bilaterally into rib periosteal envelopes in 8 pigs. To examine the contributions of ASCs and rhBMP-2, the following groups were assessed: group 1, periosteum alone; group 2, periosteum+ASCs; group 3, periosteum+rhBMP-2/ACS; and group 4, periosteum+ASCs+rhBMP-2/ACS. After 8 weeks, the allograft constructs were harvested for micro-computed tomography (CT) and histologic analyses and 3-point bending to assess the strength. RESULTS: On harvesting, the constructs receiving rhBMP-2/ACS had significantly greater bone shown by micro-CT than those receiving periosteum only (51,463 vs. 34,310 mm3; P = .031). The constructs receiving ASCs had increased bone compared to group 1 (periosteum only), although not significantly (P = .087). The combination of rhBMP-2/ACS with ASCs produced bone (50,399 mm3) equivalent to that of the constructs containing rhBMP-2/ACS only. The 3-point bending tests showed no differences between the 4 groups and a nonimplanted allograft or native mandible (P = .586), suggesting the absence of decreased strength of the allograft bone when revitalized. CONCLUSIONS: These data have shown that rhBMP-2/ACS significantly stimulates new bone formation by way of allograft revitalization and that the revitalized allograft has equivalent mechanical strength to native bone.


Assuntos
Aloenxertos/fisiologia , Regeneração Óssea/fisiologia , Engenharia Tecidual/métodos , Implantes Absorvíveis , Tecido Adiposo/citologia , Animais , Autoenxertos/transplante , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Diferenciação Celular/fisiologia , Condrogênese/fisiologia , Colágeno , Feminino , Humanos , Mandíbula/patologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/métodos , Modelos Animais , Osteogênese/fisiologia , Periósteo/cirurgia , Maleabilidade , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Estresse Mecânico , Suínos , Preservação de Tecido/métodos , Alicerces Teciduais/química , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/uso terapêutico , Microtomografia por Raio-X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...