Effects of the Use of Neuronavigation in Patients with Supratentorial Brain Gliomas: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the growing acceptance of neuronavigation in the field of neurosurgery, there is limited comparative research with contradictory results. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness (tumor resection rate and survival) and safety (frequency of neurological complications) of surgery for brain gliomas with or without neuronavigation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated data obtained from electronic records of patients who underwent surgery for gliomas at Dr. Alejandro Dávila Bolaños Military Hospital and the Clinic Hospital of Barcelona between July 2016 and September 2022. The preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiologic characteristics were analyzed and compared according to the use of neuronavigation. RESULTS: This study included 110 patients, of whom 79 underwent surgery with neuronavigation. Neuronavigation increased gross total resection by 57% in patients in whom it was used; gross total resection was performed in 56% of patients who underwent surgery with neuronavigation as compared with 35.5% in those who underwent surgery without neuronavigation (risk ratio [RR], 1.57; P=0.056). The incidence of postoperative neurologic deficits (transient and permanent) decreased by 79% with the use of neuronavigation, (12% vs. 33.3%; RR, 0.21; P=0.0003). Neuronavigation improved survival in patients with grade IV gliomas (15 months vs. 13.8 months), but it was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR), 0.19; P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Neuronavigation improved the effectiveness (greater gross total resection of tumors) and safety (fewer neurological deficits) of brain glioma surgery. However, neuronavigation does not significantly influence the survival of patients with grade IV gliomas.

Delayed hemorrhage after pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: delayed occurrence or delayed diagnosis?

BACKGROUND: Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is a well-known invasive diagnostic method for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Its rate of complications is relatively low, being the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) the most relevant. Most centers perform immediate imaging studies after SEEG to rule out complications. However, delayed intracranial hemorrhages (DIH) can occur despite normal imaging studies in the immediate postoperative period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of DRE pediatric patients operated on SEEG between April 2016 and December 2020 in our institution. After implantation, an immediate postoperative CT was performed to check electrode placement and rule out acute complications. An additional MRI was performed 24 h after surgery. We collected all postoperative hemorrhages and considered them as major or minor according to Wellmer´s classification. RESULTS: Overall, 25 DRE patients were operated on SEEG with 316 electrodes implanted. Three ICHs were diagnosed on postoperative imaging. Two of them were asymptomatic requiring no treatment, while the other needed surgical evacuation after clinical worsening. The total risk of hemorrhage per procedure was 12%, but just one third of them were clinically relevant. Two hemorrhages were not visible on immediate postoperative CT, being incidentally diagnosed in the 24 h MRI. We recorded them as DIH and are reported in detail. CONCLUSION: Few reports of DIH after SEEG exist in the literature. It remains unclear whether these cases are late occurring hemorrhages or immediate postoperative hemorrhages undiagnosed on initial imaging. According to our findings, we recommend to perform additional late postoperative imaging to diagnose these cases and manage them accurately.

Revisión Estado actual de la cirugía de la epilepsia en España. Compendio y conciencia / Current status of epilepsy surgery in Spain. Compendium and awareness

INTRODUCCIÓN: La epilepsia refractaria al tratamiento médico afecta a entre un tercio y una cuarta parte de los pacientes con epilepsia. Dentro de este grupo, con peor calidad de vida y altos costes sanitarios, existe una considerable proporción de pacientes con causas de epilepsia potencialmente quirúrgicas, y la cirugía de la epilepsia es una opción terapéutica comprobada. En España no sabemos el número real de pacientes que llegan a tratarse en relación con el total de los casos con epilepsia refractaria que podrían beneficiarse del tratamiento quirúrgico. OBJETIVO: Analizar el número de cirugías de epilepsia realizadas y publicadas en relación con los potenciales casos de epilepsia refractaria candidatos a cirugía en nuestro país. MÉTODO: Se realizó una revisión mediante la búsqueda bibliográfica en PubMed y Cochrane de artículos publicados entre 1990 y 2020, combinando las siguientes palabras y operadores booleanos: epilepsy surgery IN Spain’. Se clasificaron las evidencias y recomendaciones según los criterios pronósticos del Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine (2001) y de la European Federation of Neurological Societies (2004) para actuaciones terapéuticas. RESULTADOS: El 75,6% de las publicaciones se originó en las comunidades autónomas de Madrid y Cataluña. El 46,4% de los artículos publicados son de series cortas. Contabilizamos 2.113 intervenciones quirúrgicas (resecciones, cirugías paliativas, implantación de electrodos profundos e implantación de neuroestimuladores), lo que representa el 8,7% de la población estimada con epilepsia refractaria. CONCLUSIÓN: La cirugía de la epilepsia en nuestro medio es una indicación terapéutica infrautilizada y que no se ofrece o no se administra a la mayoría de los potenciales beneficiarios

INTRODUCTION: Drug-resistant epilepsy affects between a third and a quarter of patients with epilepsy. Within this group, with a poorer quality of life and high healthcare costs, there is a considerable proportion of patients with potentially surgical causes of epilepsy, and epilepsy surgery is a proven therapeutic option. In Spain, we do not know the actual number of patients who are treated in relation to the total number of cases of refractory epilepsy that could benefit from surgical treatment. AIM: To analyse the number of epilepsy surgical interventions performed and published in relation to the potential cases of refractory epilepsy who are candidates for surgery in our country. METHOD: A review was carried out through a literature search in PubMed and Cochrane of articles published between 1990 and 2020, combining the following words and Boolean operators: epilepsy surgery IN Spain’. The evidence and recommendations were classified according to the prognostic criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (2001) and of Neurological Societies (2004) for therapeutic actions. RESULTS: The majority (75.6%) of the publications came from the autonomous communities of Madrid and Catalonia and 46.4% of the articles published were short series. We counted 2,113 surgical interventions (resections, palliative interventions, implantation of deep electrodes and implantation of neurostimulators), which represents 8.7% of the estimated population with refractory epilepsy. CONCLUSION. Epilepsy surgery in our country is an underused therapeutic indication that is not offered or administered to the majority of potential beneficiaries

[Primary prophylaxis of early seizures after surgery of cerebral supratentorial tumors: Group for the Study of Functional-Sterotactic Neurosurgery of The Spain Society of Neurosurgery recommendations]. / Control de las crisis epilépticas durante el postoperatorio inmediato de los tumores cerebrales supratentoriales: recomendaciones del Grupo de Neurocirugía Funcional y Estereotáctica de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía.

Our review of the literature is basically focused on the primary prophylaxis of early seizures after surgery of cerebral supratentorial tumors, with the aim of suggesting several recommendations in medical antiepileptic treatment to avoid this kind of seizures which occur immediately after surgery. In conclusion, it is recommended to provide criteria for prophylaxis of early seizures after surgery of cerebral supratentorial tumors. It́s recommended a one week treatment with antiepileptic drugs in patients who didnt have seizures jet, starting immediately after the surgical treatment. If seizures appear during progress of the disease, a large period treatment will be needed. Preferred antiepileptic treatment is intravenous and with a low interactions profile. Levetiracetam, followed by valproic acid seem to be most appropriated drugs due to their properties and protective effects, particularly for our patients requirements. These recommendations are considered a general proposal to effective clinical management of early seizures after surgery, not taking into account the single circumstances of our patients. Always, clinical features of the patients could modify even significantly these guides in the benefit of each patient.

Control de las crisis epilépticas durante el postoperatorio inmediato de los tumores cerebrales supratentoriales: recomendaciones del Grupo de Neurocirugía Funcional y Estereotáctica de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía / Primary prophylaxis of early seizures after surgery of cerebral supratentorial tumors: Group for the Study of Functional-Sterotactic Neurosurgery of The Spain Society of Neurosurgery recommendations

Con la finalidad de proponer una serie de recomendaciones del tratamiento médico antiepiléptico, en el perioperatorio de los tumores cerebrales supratentoriales, se realiza una revisión de la literatura enfocada sobre todo a la profilaxis primaria de las crisis epilépticas precoces acaecidas en el postoperatorio inmediato. Se concluye que es recomendable pautar profilaxis primaria antiepiléptica poscirugía durante una semana en los pacientes con tumor cerebral supratentorial que no han presentado crisis epilépticas. Si las crisis aparecen durante la evolución de la enfermedad, es necesario pautar un tratamiento a largo plazo. Dadas las características de estos pacientes, se recomienda usar un fármaco antiepiléptico con presentación por vía intravenosa y un perfil bajo de interacciones. El levetiracetam, seguido del valproato, parecen ser los más adecuados. Dichas recomendaciones deben considerarse como una guía general de manejo, pudiendo ser modificadas, incluso de manera significativa, por las circunstancias propias de cada caso clínico (AU)

Our review of the literature is basically focused on the primary prophylaxis of early seizures after surgery of cerebral supratentorial tumors, with the aim of suggesting several recommendations in medical antiepileptic treatment to avoid this kind of seizures which occur immediately after surgery. In conclusion, it is recommended to provide criteria for prophylaxis of early seizures after surgery of cerebral supratentorial tumors. It's recommended a one week treatment with antiepileptic drugs in patients who didn't have seizures jet, starting immediately after the surgical treatment. If seizures appear during progress of the disease, a large period treatment will be needed. Preferred antiepileptic treatment is intravenous and with a low interactions profile. Levetiracetam, followed by valproic acid seem to be most appropriated drugs due to their properties and protective effects, particularly for our patients requirements. These recommendations are considered a general proposal to effective clinical management of early seizures after surgery, not taking into account the single circumstances of our patients. Always, clinical features of the patients could modify even significantly these guides in the benefit of each patient (AU)

New stereoscopic virtual reality system application to cranial nerve microvascular decompression.

PURPOSE: Cranial nerve microvascular decompression is a habitual neurosurgical procedure. Authors describe a new application of the Dextroscope (Volume Interactions, Ltd.), a virtual reality environment, to plan and properly simulate this kind of procedures. METHODS: In three cases of hemifacial spasm refractory to drugs and botulinum toxin treatment, the authors used a virtual reality workstation (Dextroscope) to develop an interactive simulation of craniotomy, approach, and Gore-Tex implant optimal size and position in order to reach vascular decompression of facial nerve. RESULTS: Three-dimensional interactive environment allowed the authors to virtually carry out craniotomy, to visualize vascular and nerve relationship, and finally, to select and to simulate best Gore-Tex graft positioning in each case. During surgical procedures, facial nerve vascular compressions were exposed and Gore-Tex grafts were successfully placed as it was virtually planned. Patient outcomes were excellent, with an average improvement of two units (0-4 grades of severity scale). CONCLUSION: Virtual reality environment can help the neurosurgeon to plan and train vascular decompression procedures. Use of appropriate craniotomy, knowledge of vascular and nerve relationship, and selection of optimum paddy size and position are the main useful applications of the Dextroscope in these procedures.