Psychotropic medication characteristics for special education students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Characteristics of psychotropic medication use have rarely been investigated for special education students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders. METHODS: The prevalence of psychotropic medication use was obtained at the beginning of a school year for a cohort of 77 students attending a self-contained middle school for special education students with emotional and/or behavioral problems, in the suburban New York City area. Demographics, intelligence quotient (IQ) and achievement testing, and objective measures of both psychopathology and school functioning were gathered. RESULTS: Overall, psychotropic medication was used in 77.9% of the participants; 52.0% received more than one medication. The most commonly prescribed medicines were atypical antipsychotics (49.4%) followed by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications (48.0%). Usage patterns for specific diagnostic presentations were examined, and appeared consistent with current clinical practice. Persistent elevated psychopathology appeared frequently in students on medication. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic medication use in this unique but important sample of special education students appeared generally consistent with recent psychotropic prevalence research. The need for collaboration between special education teachers and prescribing physicians, in order to achieve optimal medication adjustment for these students, was highlighted.

A DSM-IV-referenced, adolescent self-report rating scale.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Youth's Inventory-4 (YI-4), a DSM-IV-referenced self-report rating scale. METHOD: Youths (N = 239) aged between 11 and 18 years who were clinically evaluated between 1996 and 1999 completed the YI-4, and 79% completed at least one additional self-report. Parents and teachers completed a companion measure. A second sample (N = 47) was retested 2 weeks after an initial evaluation. RESULTS: The YI-4 demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (alpha values = .66-.87) and test-retest reliability (r values = 0.54-0.92), convergent and to lesser extent divergent validity with other self-report measures, and discriminant validity by differentiating children with and without diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, substance use, generalized anxiety disorder, or major depressive disorder. Youth-parent (r values = 0.05-0.50) and youth-teacher (r values < 0.18) agreement was generally modest. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary support for the clinical utility of the YI-4 for symptom assessment in referred youths.