Postoperative Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Electrodiagnosis in Patients With Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of diagnosing tarsal tunnel syndrome with an electrodiagnostic study is just over 50%. Given this low reliability, many surgeons prefer to make a diagnosis solely from a physical examination, despite reported electrodiagnostic findings. Thus, to understand the clinical ramifications between these 2 methods of diagnosis, this investigation compared the postoperative outcomes following a tarsal tunnel release between patients with positive and negative preoperative electrodiagnosis (EDx). METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 53 consecutive patients who underwent tarsal tunnel release by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. The primary outcome was pain level using visual analog scale (VAS) whereas the secondary outcomes were 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, recovery times (time to return to activities of daily living, work, and sports), and complications. Pre- and postoperative functional outcomes were compared within each EDx group using a paired sample t test. Postoperative outcomes between groups were compared using a generalized linear model adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Both EDx groups (positive studies = 31 patients and negative studies = 22 patients) demonstrated significant improvement of all functional outcomes (P < .001). We found no significant difference in recovery time or postoperative outcomes between the 2 groups (P > .05). Multivariable analysis showed diabetes (risk ratio [RR] = 1.79, 95% CI 1.11-2.90) and longer duration of symptoms before surgery (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) as prognostic factors for residual pain following tarsal tunnel release. CONCLUSION: In our series, we found that preoperative electrodiagnostic results did not prognosticate postoperative functional outcomes or recovery times after tarsal tunnel release.

Bilateral Os Trigonum Fracture Treated With Simultaneous Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy.

This is a case report of a 21-year-old female undergraduate student who sustained bilateral ankle injuries while jumping from a moving van wearing 3-inch high heel shoes. Upon initial presentation, her injury was treated conservatively as an acute bilateral ankle sprain for 6 weeks. However, the patient reported no improvement of pain and remained unable to self-ambulate. Bilateral MRI and CT scans of both ankles demonstrated bilateral os trigonum fractures. She underwent bilateral posterior ankle arthroscopic débridement of both os trigonum. At the postoperative 36-month follow-up, the patient reported notable improvement of all functional outcomes (36-item Short Form survey and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), reported return to the same level of sports activities, and experienced no pain (visual analog scale) on either ankle. This is the first report in the literature of bilateral os trigonum fracture treated with simultaneous posterior ankle arthroscopic débridement.

Outcomes and Complications of Open vs Posterior Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Open subtalar arthrodesis is the standard treatment for subtalar arthritis. Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (PASTA) has recently gained increasing popularity due to a shorter recovery time and better cosmesis. However, studies comparing outcomes and complications between these 2 techniques are limited. METHODS: In total, 56 patients with subtalar joint arthritis were prospectively randomized to 2 parallel groups to receive either PASTA (n = 28 patients) or open subtalar arthrodesis (n = 28 patients). The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Primary outcome was union rate confirmed on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Secondary outcomes were union time; visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores; tourniquet time; and complications. RESULTS: Union time (9.4 vs 12.8 weeks) and recovery time (time to return to activities of daily living [8.4 vs 10.8 weeks], work [10.6 vs 12.9 weeks], and sports [24.9 vs 32.7 weeks]) were significantly shorter with PASTA than with the open technique (P < .05 all). Both techniques led to significant improvements in all functional outcomes (FAAM, SF-36, and VAS scores; P < .01 all); however, there was no significant difference between the techniques in these outcomes (P > .05 all). Other outcomes, including tourniquet time (55.8 vs 67.2 min), union rate (96.3% vs 100%), and complication rate, were not significantly different between the techniques. CONCLUSION: Both open and PASTA techniques led to significant improvements in pain and function in patients with isolated subtalar joint arthritis. Although short-term functional outcomes and complication rates were not significantly different between the techniques, the PASTA technique was better at shortening the union and recovery times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Anatomy and biomechanics of the Lisfranc ligamentous complex: A systematic literature review.

Lisfranc injuries are challenging to treat and can have a detrimental effect on active individuals. Over the past decade researchers have investigated methods for the reconstruction of the Lisfranc ligamentous complex (LLC) to preserve its functional stability and mobility. To aid in this innovation, this study presents the current understanding of the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the LLC through a systematic review. Three medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) were searched from inception through July 2019. Original studies investigating the anatomy and/or biomechanical properties of the LLC were considered for inclusion. Data recorded from each study included: number of cadavers, number of feet, gender, laterality, age, type of specimen, measurement methods, reported ligamentous bundles, ligament origins and insertions, geometric characteristics, and biomechanical properties of the LLC. The Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale was used to assess the methodologic quality of included articles. Eight cadaveric studies investigating the LLC were included out of 1204 screened articles. Most articles described the LLC as three distinct structures: the dorsal- (DLL), interosseous- (ILL), and plantar- (PLL) Lisfranc Ligaments. The ILL had the largest thickness and insertional area of osseous attachment. Biomechanically, the ILL also had the highest stiffness and resistance to load prior to failure when loaded parallel to its fiber orientation. Current knowledge of the anatomical and biomechanical properties of the LLC are presented and highlight its significant role of stabilizing the tarsometatarsal articulation. Appreciating the biomechanical characteristics of the ILL may improve clinical insight in managing LLC injuries.

Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. Although of questionable accuracy, bilateral weightbearing radiographs are considered the current gold standard to assess these injuries. However, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), which provides clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be used for evaluation. This study aims to design a protocol that reliably measures the distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) to assess the Lisfranc joint using WBCT imaging. METHODS: Two unique methods of measuring the C1-M2 distance were designed that localize the center of the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (ILL, reference point). This reference point was located by (I) measuring a specific distance at the M2 base, or (II) approximating from nearby bony landmarks, on both axial (Ax) and coronal (Cor) WBCT images. Four parameters (I-Ax, I-Cor, II-Ax, and II-Cor) were evaluated for each of 96 specimens. Measurements were recorded by three independent observers and repeated for inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: In total, 96 patient image series were included and assessed in our study with an average age of 46 (19-66, SD 16.1) and average BMI of 25.8 (17.8-30.5, SD 4.3). I-Ax showed excellent agreement for intra-observer evaluation (R = 0.802) and good agreement for inter-observer evaluation (R = 0.727). I-Cor demonstrated excellent inter- (R = 0.814) and intra-observer (R = 0.840) agreement. Good agreement was found for both II-Ax and II-Cor for both intra- (R = 0.730, R = 0.708) and inter-observer (R = 0.705, R = 0.645) evaluation. CONCLUSION: Measuring the C1-M2 joint space with coronal WBCT imaging through a protocol that localizes the ILL is reproducible, simple, and can potentially be utilized clinically to evaluate the Lisfranc joint.

Comparative assessment of midfoot osteoarthritis diagnostic sensitivity using weightbearing computed tomography vs weightbearing plain radiography.

PURPOSE: Accuracy in diagnosing osteoarthritis in the midfoot using weightbearing plain radiography (WBPR) remains questionable due to the overlapping osseous architecture present, occluding visualization. Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), providing clearer bony landmark identification and joint space visualization, can also be used for evaluation. The aim of this project is to perform a standardized retrospective intra-patient analysis identifying the discrepancy of midfoot osteoarthritis diagnosis and osteoarthritis severity grading between WBPR and WBCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 302 patient feet was acquired from an internal, consecutive patient database using detailed inclusion criteria. The musculoskeletal radiologist interpretation of the WBCT and WBPR of each specimen was then assessed for any direct diagnosis or mention of osteoarthritic signs in specific articulations of 3 midfoot joint groups (Chopart, "central", and tarsometatarsal). WBPR sensitivity and specificity metrics were calculated with WBCT considered the gold standard for comparison. RESULTS: From the WBPR radiologist interpretation, we found diagnostic sensitivity of 72.5 % and specificity of 87.9 % for Chopart joints; 61.5 % sensitivity, and 96.1 % specificity for central joints; and 68.4 % sensitivity, and 92.9 % specificity for tarsometatarsal joints. The severity of degenerative changes was also consistently underestimated when interpreted from WBPR relative to WBCT. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, midfoot osteoarthritis was often undetected on WBPR. WBCT imaging facilitates an earlier, more reliable diagnosis and grading of midfoot osteoarthritis relative to WBPR.

Limitations of accessibility of the talar dome with different open surgical approaches.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to systematically review the current, relevant literature and provide a thorough understanding of the various open surgical approaches utilized to gain access to the talar dome for treatment of osteochondral lesions. Realizing the limits of access from soft tissue exposures and osteotomies, with and without external distraction, will help surgeons to select the appropriate approach for each individual clinical situation. METHODS: A literature search was performed using three major medical databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Embase. The Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study. RESULTS: Of 3108 reviewed articles, nine cadaveric studies (113 limbs from 83 cadavers) evaluating the accessibility of the talar dome were included in the final analysis. Most of these (7/9 studies) investigated talar dome access in the context of treating osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) requiring perpendicular visualization of the involved region. Five surgical approaches (anteromedial; AM, anterolateral; AL, posteromedial; PM, posterolateral; PL, and direct posterior via an Achilles tendon splitting; DP), four types of osteotomy (anterolateral tibial, medial malleolar, distal fibular, and plafondplasty), and two methods of distraction (Hintermann retractor and external fixator) were used among the included studies. The most commonly used methods quantified talar access in the sagittal plane (6/9 studies, 66.7%). The greatest exposure of the talar dome can be achieved perpendicularly by performing an additional malleolar osteotomy (90.9% for lateral, and 100% for medial). The methodological quality of all included studies was determined to be satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Gaining perpendicular access to the central portion of the talar dome, measured in the sagittal plane, has clear limitations via soft tissue approaches either medially or laterally from the anterior or posterior aspects of the ankle. It is possible to access a greater talar dome area in a non-perpendicular fashion, especially from the posterior soft tissue approach. Various types of osteotomies can provide greater accessibility to the talar dome. This systematic review can help surgeons to select the appropriate approach for treatment of OLTs in each individual patient preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Change in the First Cuneiform-Second Metatarsal Distance After Simulated Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury Evaluated by Weightbearing CT Scans.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the widening between the first cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) in a Lisfranc ligamentous complex (LLC) joint injury model subjected to successive ligament dissections evaluated by weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Twenty-four intact cadaveric feet served as the control (condition 1). Each component of the LLC (dorsal, interosseous, and plantar ligaments-conditions 2, 3, and 4, respectively) were then sequentially dissected. The specimens were equally randomized to 1 of 3 additional dissections (first or second tarsometatarsal [TMT] joint capsule or first-second intercuneiform ligament [ICL]-conditions 5a, 5b, and 5c, respectively). One additional ligament was then randomly transected (eg, condition 6ac-transection of the first TMT capsule and ICL). Finally, the remaining ligament was transected (condition 7). After each dissection, CT scans were acquired under nonweightbearing (NWB, 0 kg), partial-weightbearing (PWB, 40 kg), and full-weightbearing (FWB, 80 kg) conditions. The distance between the lateral border of C1 and the medial border of M2 was assessed to evaluate diastasis. Linear regressions with 95% CIs and converted q values were used to compare the measured data. RESULTS: No significant differences were found within the control. In condition 4, an average axial plane widening relative to control of 1.6 mm (95% CI, 1.5-1.8) and 2.1 mm (95% CI, 1.9-2.2) was observed under PWB and FWB. A coronal plane widening of 1.5 mm (95% CI, 1.3-1.6) and 1.9 mm (95% CI, 1.7-2.1) under PWB and FWB, respectively, was measured. A 95% CI of at least a 2-mm widening during PWB was demonstrated in 5c, 6ac, 6bc, and 7. CONCLUSIONS: Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans were used to detect ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model. Relative axial widening greater than 1.5 mm under PWB conditions could indicate a complete LLC injury. Complete transection of the intercuneiform 1-2 ligament was required to detect a 2-mm widening in the nonweightbearing condition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides insight on the detection of various severities of LLC injuries using WBCT imaging.

Asymmetric lambda sign of the second tarsometatarsal joint on axial weight-bearing cone-beam CT scans of the foot: preliminary investigation for diagnosis of subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model.

BACKGROUND: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose. Although of questionable accuracy, the current gold standard to assess these injuries is through bilateral weight-bearing radiography. However, weight-bearing cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT), providing clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be utilized for evaluation. This study aims to establish the hypothesis that a specific weight-bearing CBCT finding (asymmetric lambda sign) can serve as an independent indicator of a subtle Lisfranc injury. METHODS: Weight-bearing CBCT images of 24 match-paired cadaveric legs were acquired, initially intact, and then following sequential dissection of each aspect (dorsal, interosseous, and plantar ligaments, respectively) of the Lisfranc ligamentous complex (LLC). All scans were taken in non- (NWB, 0 kg), partial- (PWB, 40 kg), and full-weight-bearing (FWB, 80 kg) manners. The lambda sign was then inspected axially for asymmetry (positive sign) by identifying three symmetrical joint spaces created between the medial cuneiform and the second metatarsal base (C1-M2), the medial and middle cuneiform (C1-C2), and the second metatarsal base and middle cuneiform (M2-C2). RESULTS: A positive sign was observed in 25.6% (221/864) of all studies. Most notably, the fully dissected specimens demonstrated an asymmetric lambda sign in 33.3%, 72.2%, and 83.3% in NWB, PWB, and FWB conditions, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability kappa value was calculated to be 0.843 and 0.912. CONCLUSION: An asymmetric lambda sign is a simple and useful indicator for a complete LLC injury in PWB and FWB conditions using a cadaver model.

Surgical outcome of chronic Lisfranc injury without secondary degenerative arthritis: A systematic literature review✰.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Lisfranc joint injuries (tarsometatarsal, TMT) can present as a variety of clinical symptoms and radiographic findings. If significant arthritis at the Lisfranc joint is present, salvage arthrodesis is an option. For patients who receive a delayed diagnosis and/or present with no signs of arthritic changes, selecting the most appropriate treatment can be challenging. This article provides a systematic review of current surgical treatment options and outcomes for patients with a chronic Lisfranc injury but no secondary degenerative changes. METHODS: Four major medical databases were searched from inception through March 5, 2019: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Embase. Studies were included if they were original research studies that assessed the outcome of patients treated surgically for chronic Lisfranc injuries without secondary osteoarthritic changes. Only studies written in English and German were considered. The following data were recorded from each study: number of patients and feet included, study design (prospective vs. retrospective, single vs. multicenter, level of evidence), time between initial injury and operation, operative techniques, age, mechanism of injury, type of injury (purely ligamentous or ligamentous with concomitant bony fractures), indications for surgery, pre-operative assessment, postoperative follow-up time, time to return to activity or sport, and clinical outcome. The modified Coleman Score was used to assess the methodologic quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Of the 6,845 screened, ten studies met the above criteria and were included. All but one were single center studies. All studies were either retrospective or prospective case series. Overall, studies generally reported low complication rates and good functional outcomes. Postoperative outcomes were most frequently measured with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle (AOFAS) score; the overall mean preoperative AOFAS scores of 55.7 significantly improved to 88.1 at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: No definitive consensus exists on how Lisfranc instability without concurrent osteoarthritis should be surgically managed. Despite the delay in diagnosis, patients who undergo surgical repair for chronic, unstable Lisfranc injury without osteoarthritis have improved patient outcome and few post-surgical complications. While the quality of these studies is satisfactory, a larger patient cohort and prospective analysis could further strengthen arguments for or against certain surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Systematic Review of Level IV Studies.

Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the Lisfranc joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and ScienceDirect were systematically searched. Thirty articles were subdivided by imaging modality: conventional radiography (17 articles), ultrasonography (six articles), computed tomography (CT) (four articles), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (11 articles). Some articles discussed multiple modalities. The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement methods, participant number, sensitivity, specificity, and measurement technique accuracy. Methodological quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: Conventional radiography commonly assesses Lisfranc injuries by evaluating the distance between either the first and second metatarsal base (M1-M2) or the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base (C1-M2) and the congruence between each metatarsal base and its connecting tarsal bone. For ultrasonography, C1-M2 distance and dorsal Lisfranc ligament (DLL) length and thickness are evaluated. CT clarifies tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint alignment and occult fractures obscured on radiographs. Most MRI studies assessed Lisfranc ligament integrity. Overall, included studies show low bias for all domains except patient selection and are applicable to daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: While conventional radiography can demonstrate frank diastasis at the TMT joints; applying weightbearing can improve the viewer's capacity to detect subtle Lisfranc injury by radiography. Although ultrasonography can evaluate the DLL, its accuracy for diagnosing Lisfranc instability remains unproven. CT is more beneficial than radiography for detecting non-displaced fractures and minimal osseous subluxation. MRI is clearly the best for detecting ligament abnormalities; however, its utility for detecting subtle Lisfranc instability needs further investigation. Overall, the available studies' methodological quality was satisfactory.

Evaluation of Asymptomatic Contralateral Foot Deformities Using the Tripod Index.

Background: The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic pes planus and cavovarus foot deformities using the tripod index (TI). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 122 adult subjects over the age of 18 from January 2010 to December 2016 with symptomatic pes planus (n=78) or cavovarus (n=44) foot deformities. We subdivided both groups into subjects who presented with unilateral symptomatic deformities (pes planus unilateral symptomatic; cavovarus unilateral symptomatic) and bilateral symptomatic foot deformities (pes planus bilateral symptomatic feet and cavovarus bilateral symptomatic feet). The severity of TI was compared between sides. Results: The prevalence of asymptomatic pes planus and cavovarus foot deformities was 52% and 67.6%, respectively. Subjects with unilateral symptomatic foot deformities had significantly more severe TI values for the symptomatic cavovarus foot -98.96% (-288.89 to 0%) compared to asymptomatic cavovarus -67.41% (-270.59 to 14.71%) (p=0.015). Subjects with unilateral symptomatic pes planus deformity also had more severe TI on the symptomatic foot 57.49 (-9.38 to 141.67%) compared to the asymptomatic foot 30.43 (-51.52 to 119.23%) (p<0.01). Subjects with bilateral symptomatic foot deformities had no significant difference in severity of Tripod Index between feet. Conclusion: Although half of subjects with unilateral symptomatic deformities had a foot deformity on the contralateral side, the severity of deformity between symptomatic and asymptomatic feet was significantly different for both pes planus and cavovarus feet. Further studies should prospectively follow postoperative radiographs to determine whether a correction in foot alignment directly improves symptoms.Level of evidence: III.

Screw fixation of the syndesmosis alters joint contact characteristics in an axially loaded cadaveric model.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of rigid syndesmotic fixation on functional talar position and cartilage contact mechanics. METHODS: Twelve below-knee cadaveric specimens with an intact distal syndesmosis were mechanically loaded in four flexion positions (20° plantar flexion, 10° plantar flexion, neutral, 10° dorsiflexion) with zero, one, or two 3.5-mm syndesmotic screws. Rigid clusters of reflective markers were used to track bony movement and ankle-specific pressure sensors were used to measure talar dome and medial/lateral gutter contact mechanics. RESULTS: Screw fixation caused negligible anterior and inferior shifts of the talus within the mortise. Relative to no fixation, mean peak contact pressure decreased by 6%-32% on the talar dome and increased 2.4- to 6.6-fold in the medial and lateral gutters, respectively, depending on ankle position and number of screws. CONCLUSIONS: Two-way ANOVA indicated syndesmotic screw fixation significantly increased contact pressure in the medial/lateral gutters and decreased talar dome contact pressure while minimally altering talar position.

Neurovascular and Clinical Outcomes of the Percutaneous Endoscopically Assisted Calcaneal Osteotomy (PECO) Technique to Correct Hindfoot Malalignment.

BACKGROUND:: Standard open calcaneal osteotomies to correct hindfoot malalignment have been associated with high complication rates, including nerve damage and wound infection. This has resulted in the development of minimally invasive techniques such as the percutaneous endoscopically assisted calcaneal osteotomy (PECO), which in cadaver studies has been shown to be potentially safer than open surgeries. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of PECO in a clinical setting, with regard to neurovascular injury rates, infection, and short-term radiographic and functional outcomes. METHODS:: Forty-one (41) patients with planovalgus or cavovarus foot deformities underwent treatment using PECO. Outcomes were analyzed at 6 months and primarily included neurovascular outcomes and wound infection rates. Secondarily, radiographic and functional (visual analog scale for pain [VAS], 36-Item Short Form Medical Outcomes Survey [SF-36], and Foot Function Index [FFI] scores) outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS:: There were no reported cases of superficial wound infections, lateral calcaneal or sural nerve dysesthesia. Minor complications occurred in 6/41 feet. The mean postoperative hindfoot correction was 8.3 ± 2.2 mm (range: 6-15mm) compared to preoperative status. Compared to preoperative status, significant improvements ( P = .001 for all) were seen in the VAS, SF-36, and FFI at 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS:: PECO resulted in minimal complications with no lateral calcaneal or sural nerve dysesthesias and no wound complications. It also resulted in significant improvements in postoperative radiographic and functional outcomes from baseline to 6-months postoperatively, demonstrating its use as a safe and effective means of treating hindfoot malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Outcomes and Complications Following Endoscopically Assisted Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair.

PURPOSE: To review functional and clinical outcomes as well as complications in patients who underwent endoscopically assisted percutaneous Achilles tendon repair using 4-strand core suture configuration via a 6-portal technique. METHODS: A retrospective chart review with prospectively collected data was performed in 23 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopically assisted percutaneous Achilles tendon repair between 2008 and 2015. The minimum follow-up to be included in the study was 24 months. The primary outcome was Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports subscales; Short Form-36 (SF-36), physical and mental component summaries (PCS and MCS); and visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included tourniquet time, recovery time, and complications. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (18 males and 5 females, all unilateral) with the mean age of 36.7 years were included and 6 patients were repaired using an open technique because they did not meet the inclusion criteria owing to presenting late in the clinic (injury more than 2-3 weeks). The average time to final follow-up was 54.1 months. The average tourniquet time was 41.3 minutes. There was significant improvement of VAS (7.9/10 to 0.1/10), SF-36 (PCS, 32.5-44.7, and MCS, 47.9-51.4), and FAAM (ADL, 26.1.0-83.0, and Sports, 0-61.7). The average time to return to activities of daily living, work, and sports were 8.0 weeks, 8.8 weeks, and 5.7 months, respectively. The postoperative morbidity included superficial wound infection at the portal (1 patient with underlying type 2 diabetes, 4.3%) and there was no rerupture, deep vein thrombosis, sural nerve injury, and painful scar in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopically assisted percutaneous Achilles tendon repair has significant improvement in terms of functional outcomes as measured with the FAAM, SF-36, and VAS. This technique is safe and feasible with minimal postoperative pain and morbidities, early return to activities, and satisfactory functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Brake Reaction Time After Ankle and Subtalar Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative and postoperative brake reaction time (BRT) of patients undergoing right-sided ankle or subtalar arthroscopy. METHODS: Patients who underwent right-sided ankle or subtalar arthroscopy were evaluated between May 2015 and February 2017. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients older than 18 years who possessed a valid driver's license, primarily drove vehicles that had automatic transmission, and used their right foot to depress the brake pedal. Patients were excluded if they had medical problems that precluded safe and legal driving. An automotive simulation device was used to calculate BRT from all participants. Each patient underwent testing on a computerized driving simulator preoperatively and then postoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks or until their BRT was equal to or less than 0.7 seconds. BRT was defined as the time from stop stimulus until brake depression of 5%. RESULTS: The study enrolled 17 patients and 19 age-matched normal subjects. Patients showed an average BRT at 2 weeks postoperatively (0.57 ± 0.06 seconds) that was greater than the BRT in the control group (0.55 ± 0.06 seconds, P = .84) and lower than the patients' preoperative BRT (0.59 ± 0.06 seconds, P = .08). These BRTs were lower than the 0.70-second BRT threshold for safe driving in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that emergency BRT after right-sided ankle or subtalar arthroscopy improves by 2 weeks after surgery and is under the previously set benchmark of 0.7 seconds. In patients who undergo right-sided ankle or subtalar arthroscopic procedures, it is not unsafe to drive a vehicle at 2 weeks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talar Dome.

Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) is a common condition associated with ankle injury that brings challenges in the diagnosis and treatment. Symptoms related to this condition are nonspecific including pain, swelling, stiffness, and mechanical symptoms of locking and catching. While the natural history of the OLTs is not well understood, surgical treatment is often required especially in chronic cases and acute cases with displaced articular fragments. Arthroscopic treatment of the OLTs aims to restore ankle joint function and pain relief by the removal of the chondral or osteochondral fragment, debridement and stabilization of cartilage rim and subchondral bone, and stimulate healing of the bone and damaged cartilage. In patients with a large lesion or after a failure of previous bone marrow stimulation, biologic restoration techniques including the use of particulate juvenile cartilage techniques, autogenous chondrocyte implantation, and osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation may have role. This article summarizes the contemporary concepts in the clinical evaluation and treatment of OLTs with particular emphasis on surgical strategies.

Optimizing Arthroscopy for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: The Effect of Ankle Positions and Distraction During Anterior and Posterior Arthroscopy in a Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: To quantify arthroscopic accessibility of the talar dome with predefined ankle positions through anterior and posterior approaches. METHODS: Fourteen below-knee cadaver specimens underwent preoperative range of motion assessments. A 30° 2.7-mm arthroscopic camera was used to mark accessible areas at varying ankle positions. Accessible regions were quantified using a surface laser scanner and digital 3 × 3 grid. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences in arthroscopic accessibility between different flexion angles and noninvasive distraction. RESULTS: The mean arthroscopic accessibility of the talus was 58.5% and 49.8% for the anterior and posterior approaches, respectively (P < .001). During anterior arthroscopy, accessibility increased with up to 30° of plantarflexion (P < .001). There were no significant differences in accessibility between flexion groups for the posterior approach. There was significantly greater central zone accessibility for anterior arthroscopy (87.7%) when compared with posterior arthroscopy (74.3%; P = .002). Arthroscopic accessibility increased with increasing ankle distraction for both the anterior and posterior approaches (parameter estimates ± standard error): anterior = 6.5% ± 1.3%/mm of distraction, P < .001; and posterior = 7.0% ± 2.8%/mm, P = .026. Frequency analysis showed that the posterior third of the talus was completely inaccessible in 7 out of 14 of ankles during anterior arthroscopy. The anterior third of the talus during posterior arthroscopy was inaccessible in 11 out of 14 ankles during posterior arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle plantarflexion up to 30° may be adequate for anterior arthroscopy for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Noninvasive distraction also increases accessibility during both anterior and posterior arthroscopy. Anterior arthroscopy should be used for central third OLTs due to greater accessibility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ankle positioning is an important consideration for anterior arthroscopy. Surgical approach used should match with the location of the OLTs.

Knee, Shoulder, and Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training: Validation of a Virtual Arthroscopy Simulator.

PURPOSE: To validate the knee, shoulder, and virtual Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Training (FAST) modules on a virtual arthroscopy simulator via correlations with arthroscopy case experience and postgraduate year. METHODS: Orthopaedic residents and faculty from one institution performed a standardized sequence of knee, shoulder, and FAST modules to evaluate baseline arthroscopy skills. Total operation time, camera path length, and composite total score (metric derived from multiple simulator measurements) were compared with case experience and postgraduate level. Values reported are Pearson r; alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: 35 orthopaedic residents (6 per postgraduate year), 2 fellows, and 3 faculty members (2 sports, 1 foot and ankle), including 30 male and 5 female residents, were voluntarily enrolled March to June 2015. Knee: training year correlated significantly with year-averaged knee composite score, r = 0.92, P = .004, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84, 0.96; operation time, r = -0.92, P = .004, 95% CI = -0.96, -0.84; and camera path length, r = -0.97, P = .0004, 95% CI = -0.98, -0.93. Knee arthroscopy case experience correlated significantly with composite score, r = 0.58, P = .0008, 95% CI = 0.27, 0.77; operation time, r = -0.54, P = .002, 95% CI = -0.75, -0.22; and camera path length, r = -0.62, P = .0003, 95% CI = -0.8, -0.33. Shoulder: training year correlated strongly with average shoulder composite score, r = 0.90, P = .006, 95% CI = 0.81, 0.95; operation time, r = -0.94, P = .001, 95% CI = -0.97, -0.89; and camera path length, r = -0.89, P = .007, 95% CI = -0.95, -0.80. Shoulder arthroscopy case experience correlated significantly with average composite score, r = 0.52, P = .003, 95% CI = 0.2, 0.74; strongly with operation time, r = -0.62, P = .0002, 95% CI = -0.8, -0.33; and camera path length, r = -0.37, P = .044, 95% CI = -0.64, -0.01, by training year. FAST: training year correlated significantly with 3 combined FAST activity average composite scores, r = 0.81, P = .0279, 95% CI = 0.65, 0.90; operation times, r = -0.86, P = .012, 95% CI = -0.93, -0.74; and camera path lengths, r = -0.85, P = .015, 95% CI = -0.92, -0.72. Total arthroscopy cases performed did not correlate significantly with overall FAST performance. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant correlations between both training year and knee and shoulder arthroscopy experience when compared with performance as measured by composite score, camera path length, and operation time during a simulated diagnostic knee and shoulder arthroscopy, respectively. Three FAST activities demonstrated significant correlations with training year but not arthroscopy case experience as measured by composite score, camera path length, and operation time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We attempt to validate an arthroscopy simulator that could be used to supplement arthroscopy skills training for orthopaedic residents.

An Anatomic Study of the Percutaneous Endoscopically Assisted Calcaneal Osteotomy Technique to Correct Hindfoot Malalignment.

BACKGROUND: Open calcaneal osteotomy using traditional methods is associated with complications such as sural nerve injury and potential wound healing problems. We hypothesized that by using novel minimally invasive techniques, these potential risks could be mitigated. This anatomic cadaveric study serves to assess the safety of percutaneous endoscopically assisted calcaneal osteotomy (PECO) compared to a traditional open osteotomy technique. METHODS: Anatomic safety of PECO was assessed using 8 fresh-frozen cadaver below-knee specimens. Lateral calcaneal nerve (LCN) damage was primarily noted and then secondly compared to a potential open surgical incision approach. RESULTS: Only 1 of 11 LCN branches (n = 8 limbs) was transected using PECO, compared to up to 8 of 10 LCN branches (n = 6 limbs) that potentially would have been injured during open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous endoscopically assisted calcaneal osteotomy is a minimally invasive technique that had fewer nerve injuries in this cadaveric model than traditional open surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Percutaneous endoscopically assisted calcaneal osteotomy due to its less invasive nature may result in fewer neurovascular injuries relative to an open procedure.