Effectiveness of an electronic health system-based best-practice advisory to enhance the time to de-escalation of vancomycin for respiratory indications.

Objective: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is highly unlikely when nasal-swab results are negative. We evaluated the impact of an electronic prompt regarding MRSA nasal screening on the length of vancomycin therapy for respiratory indications. Design: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center (Mayo Clinic) in Jacksonville, Florida. Patients: Eligible patients received empiric treatment with vancomycin for suspected or confirmed respiratory infections from January through April 2019 (preimplementation cohort) and from October 2019 through January 2020 (postimplementation cohort). Intervention: The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with suspected or confirmed respiratory indications. Pharmacists were prompted to order a MRSA nasal swab if it was not already ordered by the provider. Methods: We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary end point was incidence of acute kidney injury. Results: The study included 120 patients (preimplementation, n = 61; postimplementation, n = 59). Median time to de-escalation was significantly shorter for the postimplementation cohort: 76 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 52-109) versus 42 hours (IQR, 37-61; P = .002). Acute kidney injury occurred in 11 patients (18%) in the preimplementation cohort and in 3 patients (5%) in the postimplementation cohort (P = .01; number needed to treat, 8). Conclusions: Implementation of a BPA notification for MRSA nasal screening helped decrease the time to de-escalation of vancomycin.

Safety and Efficacy of Intensified Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Neuroendovascular Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of intensified antiplatelet therapy guided by VerifyNow assay P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) reported values in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. METHODS: An observational, retrospective review was conducted at a single academic tertiary referral center and comprehensive stroke center from December 1, 2012, to August 31, 2014. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of thromboembolic complications stratified by preprocedural PRU values. Secondary outcomes were assessed by investigating whether the goal PRU value of 190 or less is sufficient to reduce thromboembolic complications on the day of the procedure, and 30- and 90-day postprocedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of complications in the two groups (two events in the group with preprocedural PRU values of 190 or more versus seven events in the group with preprocedural PRU values of less than 190, p = 0.668). Furthermore, the rates of thromboembolic events by 90 days were not significantly different in the two groups (one event in the group with preprocedural PRU ≥ 190 versus four events in patients with preprocedural PRU < 190, p = 1). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of hemorrhagic events in the two groups by 90-day postprocedure (one versus three events, p = 0.558). CONCLUSION: The observed rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with preprocedural PRU values of less than 190 was not significantly different from the rate observed in patients with preprocedural PRU values of greater than 190. Sources of funding: No external funding used.