Prognostic implication of lung ultrasound in heart failure: pooled analysis of international cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is often used to assess congestion in heart failure (HF). In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of LUS in HF patients at admission and hospital discharge, and in an out-patient setting and explored whether clinical factors (age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and atrial fibrillation) impact the prognostic value of LUS findings. Further, we assessed the incremental prognostic value of LUS on top of AHEAD and MAGGIC clinical risk scores. METHODS AND RESULTS: We pooled data of patients hospitalized for HF or followed-up in out-patient clinics from international cohorts. We enrolled 1,947 patients, at admission (n=578), discharge (n=389) and in out-patient clinic (n=980). Total LUS B-line count was calculated for the 8-zone scanning protocol. The primary outcome was a composite of re-hospitalization for HF and all-cause death. Compared to those in the lower tertiles of B-lines, patients in the highest tertile were older, more likely to have signs of HF and higher NT-proBNP levels. A higher number of B-lines was associated with increased risk of primary outcome at discharge (Tertile3 vs Tertile1: adjustedHR= 5.74 (3.26- 10.12), p<0.0001) and in out-patients (Tertile3 vs Tertile1: adjustedHR= 2.66 (1.08- 6.54), p=0.033). Age and LVEF did not influence the prognostic capacity of LUS in different clinical settings. Adding B-line count to MAGGIC and AHEAD scores improved net reclassification significantly in all three clinical settings. CONCLUSION: A higher number of B-lines in patients with HF was associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, regardless of the clinical setting.

Poor in-hospital congestion improvement in acute heart failure patients classified according to LVEF: prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: Residual congestion in acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor prognosis. However, there is a lack of data on the prognostic value of changes in a combined assessment of in-hospital congestion. The present study sought to assess the association between in-hospital congestion changes and subsequent prognosis according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. METHODS: Patients (N=244, 80.3±7.6 years, 50.8% male) admitted for acute HF in two European tertiary care centers underwent clinical assessment (congestion score included dyspnea at rest, rales, third heart sound, jugular venous distention, peripheral edema and hepatomegaly; simplified congestion score included rales and peripheral edema), echocardiography, lung ultrasound (LUS) and natriuretic peptides (NP) measurement at admission and discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and/or HF re-hospitalization. RESULTS: In the 244 considered patients (95 HF with reduced EF, 57 HF with mildly reduced EF and 92 HF with preserved EF), patients with limited improvement in clinical congestion score (hazard ratio 2.33, 95%CI 1.51 to 3.61, p=0.0001), NP levels (2.29, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.38, p<0.0001) and the number of B-lines (6.44, 95%CI 4.19 to 9.89, p<0.001) had a significantly higher risk of outcome compared to patients experiencing more sizeable decongestion. The same pattern of association was observed when adjusting for confounding factors. A limited improvement in clinical congestion score and in the number of B-lines was related to poor prognosis for all LVEF categories. CONCLUSIONS: In AHF, the degree of congestion reduction assessed over the in-hospital stay period can stratify the subsequent event risk. Limited reduction in both clinical congestion and B-lines number are related to poor prognosis, irrespective of HF subtype.

The role and application of current pharmacological management in patients with advanced heart failure.

In the last decades, several classifications and definitions have been proposed for advanced heart failure (ADVHF) patients, including clinical, functional, hemodynamic, imaging, and electrocardiographic features. Despite different inclusion criteria, ADVHF is characterized by some common items, such as drug intolerance, low arterial pressure, multiple organ dysfunction, chronic kidney disease, and diuretic use dependency. Additional features include fatigue, hypotension, hyponatremia, and unintentional weight loss associated with a specific laboratory profile reflecting systemic multiorgan dysfunction. Notably, studies evaluating guideline-directed medical therapy recently endorsed by guidelines in stable HF, including the 4 drug classes all together (i.e., betablocker, mineral corticoid antagonist, renin angiotensin inhibitors/neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium glucose transporter inhibitors), remain scarcely analyzed in ADVHF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV. Additionally, due to the common conditions associated with advanced stages, the balance between drug tolerance and potential benefits of the contemporary use of all agents is questioned. Therefore, less hard endpoints, such as exercise tolerance, quality of life (QoL) and self-competency, are not clearly demonstrated. Specific analyses evaluating outcome and rehospitalization of each drug provided conflicting results and are often limited to subjects with stable conditions and less advanced NYHA class. Current European Society of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ESC/AHA) Guidelines do not indicate the type of treatment, dosage, and administration modalities, and they do not suggest specific indications for ADVHF patients. Due to these concerns, there is an impelling need to understand what drugs may be used as the first line, what management leads to the better outcome, and what is the best treatment algorithm in this setting. In this paper, we summarize the most common pitfalls and limitations for the use of the traditional agents, and we propose a personalized approach aiming at preserve drug tolerance and maintaining adverse event protection and satisfactory QoL.

Multi-modality assessment of congestion in acute heart failure: Associations with left ventricular ejection fraction and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Integrating clinical examination with ultrasound measures of congestion could improve risk stratification in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF). AIM: To investigate the prevalence of clinical, echocardiographic and lung ultrasound (LUS) signs of congestion according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and their association with prognosis in patients with AHF. METHODS: We pooled the data of four cohorts of patients (N = 601, 74.9±10.8 years, 59 % men) with AHF and analysed six features of congestion at enrolment: clinical (peripheral oedema and respiratory rales), biochemical (BNP/NT-proBNP≥median), echocardiographic (inferior vena cava (IVC)≥21 mm, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)≥40 mmHg, E/e'≥15) and B-lines ≥25 (8-zones) in those with reduced (<40 %, HFrEF), mildly reduced (40-49 %, HFmrEF and preserved (≥50 %HFpEF) LVEF. RESULTS: Compared to patients with HFmrEF (n = 110) and HFpEF (n = 201), those with HFrEF (N = 290) had higher natriuretic peptides, but prevalence of clinical (39 %), echocardiographic (IVC≥21 mm: 56 %, E/e'≥15: 57 %, PASP≥40 mmHg: 76 %) and LUS (48 %) signs of congestion was similar. In multivariable analysis, clinical (HR: 3.24(2.15-4.86), p < 0.001), echocardiographic [(IVC≥21 mm (HR:1.91, 1.21-3.03, p=0.006); E/e'≥15 (HR:1.54, 1.04-2.28, p = 0.031)] and LUS (HR:2.08, 1.34-3.24, p = 0.001) signs of congestion were significantly associated with all-cause mortality and/or HF re-hospitalization. Adding echocardiographic and LUS features of congestion to a model than included age, sex, systolic blood pressure, clinical congestion and natriuretic peptides, improved prediction at 90 and 180 days. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and ultrasound signs of congestion are highly prevalent in patients with AHF, regardless of LVEF and their combined assessment improves risk stratification.

Usefulness of Combined Ultrasound Assessment of E/e' Ratio, Pulmonary Pressure, and Cava Vein Status in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

Congestion is poorly investigated by ultrasound scans during acute heart failure (AHF) and systematic studies evaluating ultrasound indexes of cardiac pulmonary and systemic congestion during early hospital admission are lacking. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of ultrasound cardiac pulmonary and systemic congestion in a consecutive cohort of hospitalized patients with AHF, analyzing the relevance of each ultrasound congestion component (cardiac, pulmonary, and systemic) in predicting the risk of death and rehospitalization. This is a prospective research study of a single center that evaluates patients with an AHF diagnosis who are divided according to the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction. We performed a complete bedside echocardiography and lung ultrasound analyses within the first 24 hours of hospital admission. The ultrasound congestion score was preliminarily established by measuring the following parameters: cardiac congestion, which was defined as the contemporary presence of E/e' >15 and pulmonary systolic pressure >35 mm Hg and the pulmonary congestion, defined as the total B-line number >25 at the lung ultrasound performed in 8 chest sites; moreover, the systemic congestion was defined if the inferior vena cava (IVC) was >21 mm and if it was associated with a reduced inspiratory collapse >50%. We thoroughly assessed 230 patients and evaluated their results. Of these patients, 135 had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and there were 95 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; 122 patients experienced adverse events during the 180-day follow-up. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion (TAPSE) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.34 [0.26 to 0.41], p <0.001), E/e' (AUC 0.62 [0.54 to 0.69], p = 0.003), and IVC (AUC 0.70 [0.63 to 0.77], p <0.001) were all significantly related to poor prognosis detection. The univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that cardiac congestion in terms of E/e' and pulmonary systolic pressure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.49 [1.02 to 2.17], p = 0.037), TAPSE (HR 0.90 [0.85 to 0.94], p <0.001), and systemic congestion (HR 2.64 [1.53 to 4.56], p <0.001) were all significantly related to the 180-day outcome. After adjustment for potential confounders, only TAPSE (HR 0.92 [0.88 to 0.98], p = 0.005) and IVC (HR 1.92 [1.07 to 3.46], p = 0.029) confirmed their prognostic role. The multivariable analysis of multiple congestion levels in terms of systemic plus cardiac (HR 1.54 [1.05 to 2.25], p = 0.03), systemic plus pulmonary (HR 2.26 [1.47 to 3.47], p <0.001), and all 3 congestion features (HR 1.53 [1.06 to 2.23], p = 0.02) revealed an incremental prognostic role for each additional determinant. In conclusion, among the ultrasound indexes of congestion, IVC and TAPSE are related to adverse prognosis, and the addition of pulmonary and cardiac congestion indexes increases the risk prediction accuracy. Our data confirmed that right ventricular dysfunction and systemic congestion are the most powerful predictive factors in AHF.

Different right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary coupling in acute heart failure according to the left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and pulmonary uncoupling are two acknowledged features associated with poor outcome, however few data defined RV adaptation across the different left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) cut-off. Additionally, less data are reported in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). AIMS: The aim of present study was to analyse RV function in AHF patients presenting with either reduced or preserved EF. METHODS: This is a multi-center observational study including 380 patients affected by AHF: 235 had AHF with reduced EF (AHFrEF) and 145 had AHF with preserved EF (AHFpEF). Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), S' wave velocity, and the RV end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) were measured by echocardiography. TAPSE/PASP and S'/PASP ratios were calculated as non-invasive surrogates of RV-pulmonary arterial coupling. RESULTS: Factors associated with poor outcome were higher values of PASP (45 [40-55] mmHg vs 40 [35-46] mmHg; p < 0.001), RVEDD (44 [38-47] mm vs 37 [35-42] mm; p < 0.001), lower TAPSE values (17 [15-20] mm vs 20 [18-22] mm; p < 0.001) and S' wave (10 [8-12] cm/s vs 11 [10-13] cm/s; p < 0.001), reduced TAPSE/PASP (0.37 [0.29-0.47] vs 0.50 [0.40-0.60]; p < 0.001) and S'/PASP ratios (0.22 [0.18-0.28] vs 0.28 [0.22-0.34]; p < 0.001). However, the prognostic parameters differed according to the LVEF value: in AHFpEF S'/PASP between 0.22 and 0.29 and > 0.29 demonstrated a protective prognostic value (Respectively HR 0.29 (0.16-0.53), p < 0.001 and HR 0.22 [0.12-0.42], p < 0.001). Conversely, in AHFrEF, TAPSE <16 mm (HR 2.59 [1.67-4.03], p < 0.001), ICV > 21 mm (HR 1.17 [1.17-1.28], p = 0.001) and TAPSE/PASP <0.49 HR 1.92 [1.10-3.37], p = 0.023) were related to adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: RV adaptation and RV pulmonary coupling differ in AHF according to the level of LVEF. S' wave, and S'/PASP are associated with adverse outcome in patients with preserved EF; reduced TAPSE and TAPSE/PASP are better prognostic predictors in patients with reduced EF.

[Pacemaker infection in fragile patients]. / Herzschrittmacherinfektion bei fragilen Patienten.

Complications associated with cardiac implantable electric devices (CIED) are manifold. They include lead dislocation, twiddler's syndrome, device malfunction, haematoma formation and infection. Infections can be divided into acute, subacute and late infections. Both the time of onset and the route of infection play a crucial role. The consequences of a CIED infection are devastating. The most modern treatment methods include the removal of all implanted implants. If complete removal is not followed in the event of infection, there is a high rate of infection recurrence. Open thoracic surgery to remove infected CIED hardware has been replaced by percutaneous lead extraction procedures. Lead extraction requires specialised equipment and expertise and may not be readily available or feasible for some patients. Each extraction procedure is associated with a small risk of potentially fatal complications (e.g. cardiac avulsion, vascular avulsion, haemothorax and cardiac tamponade). For these reasons, the performance of such procedures should be limited to centres with adequate equipment and experience. Successful salvage of CIED systems with in situ sterilisation of contaminated hardware has been reported. In our case, we report the successful salvage of an exposed generator in a frail patient treated more than 5 years after the last generator replacement.

Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure and Cava Vein Status in Acute Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical and Prognostic Implications.

BACKGROUND: Peak tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity and inferior cava vein (ICV) distention are two recognized features of increased pulmonary artery pressure (PASP) and right atrial pressure, respectively. Both parameters are related to pulmonary and systemic congestion and adverse outcomes. However, few data exist about the assessment of PASP and ICV in acute patients affected by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Thus, we investigated the relationship existing among clinical and echocardiographic features of congestion, and we analyzed the prognostic impact of PASP and ICV in acute HFpEF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed clinical congestion PASP and ICV value in consecutive patients admitted in our ward by echocardiographic examination using peak Doppler velocity tricuspid regurgitation and ICV diameter and collapse for the assessment of PASP and ICV dimension, respectively. A total of 173 HFpEF patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 81 and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 55% [50-57]. Mean values of PASP was 45 mmHg [35-55] and mean ICV was 22 [20-24] mm. Patients with adverse events during follow-up showed significantly higher values of PASP (50 [35-55] vs. 40 [35-48] mmHg, (p = 0.005) and increased values of ICV (24 [22-25] vs. 22 [20-23] mm, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed prognostic power of ICV dilatation (HR 3.22 [1.58-6.55], p = 0.001) and clinical congestion score ≥ 2 (HR 2.35 [1.12-4.93], p = 0.023), but PASP increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.874). The combination of PASP > 40 mmHg and ICV > 21 mm was capable of identifying patients with increased events (45% vs. 20%). CONCLUSIONS: ICV dilatation provides additional prognostic information with respect to PASP in patients with acute HFpEF. A combined model adding PASP and ICV assessment to clinical evaluation is a useful tool for predicting HF related events.

Innovations in medical therapy of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a pathological condition still characterized by high rates of mortality and disease exacerbation frequently leading to hospitalization, thus there is a continuous need for pharmacological treatments impacting on disease stability and long-term prognosis. Moreover, the phenotype of heart failure patients is continuously changing over time, and the development of new heart failure drugs is crucial to promote a personalized and targeted approach. In recent years, several therapeutic innovations have emerged in the landscape of acute and chronic HFrEF, largely changing and improving our approach to the disease. Various studies on new drugs and experimental therapeutic approaches are ongoing. The present review discusses the latest data on both recently approved drugs and developing therapeutic targets, in order to provide a critical overview for an informed and optimal approach to such a complex disease.

Gliflozins: From Antidiabetic Drugs to Cornerstone in Heart Failure Therapy-A Boost to Their Utilization and Multidisciplinary Approach in the Management of Heart Failure.

Heart failure (HF) is a complex, multifactorial, progressive clinical condition affecting 64.3 million people worldwide, with a strong impact in terms of morbidity, mortality and public health costs. In the last 50 years, along with a better understanding of HF physiopathology and in agreement with the four main models of HF, many therapeutic options have been developed. Recently, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) HF guidelines enthusiastically introduced inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2i) as first line therapy for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in order to reduce hospitalizations and mortality. Despite drugs developed as hypoglycemic agents, data from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial encouraged the evaluation of the possible cardiovascular effects, showing SGLT2i beneficial effects on loading conditions, neurohormonal axes, heart cells' biochemistry and vascular stiffness, determining an improvement of each HF model. We want to give a boost to their use by increasing the knowledge of SGLT2-I and understanding the probable mechanisms of this new class of drugs, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and providing a brief comment on major trials that made Gliflozins a cornerstone in HF therapy. Finally, aspects that may hinder SGLT2-i widespread utilization among different types of specialists, despite the guidelines' indications, will be discussed.

The Conundrum of HFpEF Definition: Non-Invasive Assessment Uncertainties and Alternative Diagnostic Strategies.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome including several morphological phenotypes and varying pathophysiological mechanisms. The conventional classification of HF based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has created an oversimplification in diagnostic criteria. Although LVEF is a standardized parameter easy to calculate and broadly applied in the large clinical trials, but it is erroneously considered an index of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Indeed, it is affected by preload and afterload and it has limitations related to reproducibility, reduced sensitivity and scarce prognostic values especially when above 50%. Notably, additional diagnostic parameters have been recently proposed in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and to homogenize the different HFpEF populations. Unfortunately, these algorithms comprise sophisticated measurements that are difficult to apply in the daily clinical practice. Additionally, the scarce diffusion of these diagnostic criteria may have led to neutral or negative results in interventional phase 3 trials. We propose changes to the current HFpEF diagnostic approach mainly based on LVEF stratification measurement aiming towards a more inclusive model taking into consideration an integrative approach starting from the main diseases responsible for cardiac dysfunction through to cardiac structural and functional alterations. Accordingly, with recent universal HF definitions, a stepwise model could be helpful in recognizing patients with early vs. overt HFpEF by the appraisal of specific Doppler echocardiographic variables. Thus, we would encourage the application of new criteria in order to better identify the different phenotypes and to move towards more personalized medicine.

Non-invasive assessment of acute heart failure by Stevenson classification: Does echocardiographic examination recognize different phenotypes?

Background: Acute heart failure (AHF) presentation is universally classified in relation to the presence or absence of congestion and the peripheral perfusion condition according to the Stevenson diagram. We sought to evaluate a relationship existing between clinical assessment and echocardiographic evaluation in patients with AHF. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective blinded multicenter analysis assessing both clinical and echocardiographic analyses during the early hospital admission for AHF. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the Stevenson presentation: group A (warm and dry), group B (cold and dry), group C (warm and wet), and group D (cold and wet). Echocardiographic evaluation was executed within 12 h from the first clinical evaluation. The following parameters were measured: left ventricular (LV) volumes, LV ejection fraction (LVEF); pattern Doppler by E/e1 ratio, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and inferior cave vein diameter (ICV). Results: We studied 208 patients, 10 in group A, 16 in group B, 153 in group C, and 29 in group D. Median age of our sample was 81 [69-86] years and the patients enrolled were mainly men (66.8%). Patients in groups C and A showed significant higher levels of systolic arterial pressures with respect to groups B and D (respectively, 130 [115-145] mmHg vs. 122 [119-130] mmHg vs. 92 [90-100] mmHg vs. 95 [90-100] mmHg, p < 0.001). Patients in groups A and C (warm) demonstrated significant higher values of LVEF with respect to patients in groups B and D (43 [34-49] vs. 42 [30-49] vs. 27 [15-31] vs. 30 [22-42]%, p < 0.001). Whereas group B experienced significant lower TAPSE values compared with other group (14 [12-17] mm vs. A: 17 [16-21] mm vs. C: 18 [14-20] mm vs. D: 16 [12-17] mm; p = 0.02). Finally, echocardiographic congestion score including PASP ≥ 40 mmHg, ICV ≥ 21, mm and E/e' > 14 did not differ among groups. Follow-up analysis showed an increased mortality rate in D group (HR 8.2 p < 0.04). Conclusion: The early Stevenson classification remains a simple and universally recognized approach for the detection of congestion and perfusion status. The combined clinical and echocardiographic assessment may be useful to better define the patients' profile.

The Analysis of Arterial Stiffness in Heart Failure Patients: The Prognostic Role of Pulse Wave Velocity, Augmentation Index and Stiffness Index.

Background: The role of arterial stiffness in the pathogenesis and clinical outcome of heart failure (HF) patients has to be clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of arterial stiffness in HF patients discharged after acute episode of decompensation by evaluating cut-off values for clinical assessment. Methods: Patients admitted for decompensated heart failure (ADHF) underwent pre-discharge evaluation. Arterial stiffness was measured by aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV), augmentation index (AIx75) and stiffness index (ß0). Patients were also evaluated after discharge for a variable follow-up time. Results: We observed 199 patients (male 61.3%, age 76.2 ± 10.7 years) after discharge for a median of 437 days (IQR 247-903), 69 (34.7%) patients suffered HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 45 (22.6%) patients experienced HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmEF) and 85 (42.7%) reported an HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). After the adjustment for principal confounders, aPWV, AIx75 and ß0 were inversely correlated with free-event survival (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, p = 0.001): only ß0 was inversely correlated with overall survival (p = 0.03). Analysing the threshold, overall survival was inversely correlated with ß0 ≥3 (HR 2.1, p = 0.04) and free-event survival was inversely correlated with aPWV ≥10 m/s (HR 1.7, p = 0.03), AIx75 ≥ 25 (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), and ß0 ≥ 3 (HR 2.0, p = 0.009). Dividing HF patients for LV ejection fraction, ß0 and AIx75 appeared to be accurate prognostic predictors among the three different classes according to free-event survival. Conclusions: The non-invasive measurements of arterial stiffness proved to be strong prognostic parameters in HF patients discharged after an acute HF decompensation.

Clinical, Laboratory and Lung Ultrasound Assessment of Congestion in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.

Congestion is the main cause of hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), however its precise assessment by simple clinical evaluation remains elusive. The recent introduction of the lung ultrasound scan (LUS) allowed to physicians to more precisely quantify pulmonary congestion. The aim of this study was to compare clinical congestion (CC) with LUS and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in order to achieve a more complete evaluation and to evaluate the prognostic power of each measurement. Methods: All patients were submitted to clinical evaluation for blood sample analysis and LUS at admission and before discharge. LUS protocol evaluated the number of B-lines for each chest zone by standardized eight site protocol. CC was measured following ESC criteria. The mean difference between admission and discharge congestion logBNP and B-lines values were calculated. Combined end points of death and rehospitalization was calculated over 180 days. Results: 213 patients were included in the protocol; 133 experienced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and 83 presented with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Patients with HFrEF had a more increased level of BNP (1150 (812−1790) vs. 851 (694−1196); p = 0.002) and B lines total number (32 (27−38) vs. 30 (25−36); p = 0.05). A positive correlation was found between log BNP and Blines number in both HFrEF (r = 0.57; p < 0.001) and HFpEF (r = 0.36; p = 0.001). Similarly, dividing B-lines among tertiles the upper group (B-lines ≥ 36) had an increased clinical congestion score. Among three variables at admission only B-lines were predictive for outcome (AUC 0.68 p < 0.001) but not LogBNP and CC score. During 180 days of follow-up, univariate analysis showed that persistent ΔB-lines <−32.3% (HR 6.54 (4.19−10.20); p < 0.001), persistent ΔBNP < −43.8% (HR 2.48 (1.69−3.63); p < 0.001) and persistent ΔCC < 50% (HR 4.25 (2.90−6.21); p < 0.001) were all significantly related to adverse outcome. Multivariable analysis confirmed that persistent ΔB-lines (HR 4.38 (2.64−7.29); p < 0.001), ΔBNP (HR 1.74 (1.11−2.74); p = 0.016) and ΔCC (HR 3.38 (2.10−5.44); p < 0.001 were associated with the combined end point. Conclusions: a complete clinical laboratory and LUS assessment better recognized different congestion occurrence in AHF. The difference between admission and discharge B-lines provides useful prognostic information compared to traditional clinical evaluation.

Different Renal Function Patterns in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Relationship With Outcome and Congestion.

Background: The role of worsening renal function during acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization is still debated. Very few studies have extensively evaluated the renal function (RF) trend during hospitalization by repetitive measurements. Objectives: To investigate the prognostic relevance of different RF trajectories together with the congestion status in hospitalized patients. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multi-center study including 467 patients admitted with AHF who were screened for the Diur-AHF Trial. We recognized five main RF trajectories based on serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) behavior. According to the RF trajectories our sample was divided into 1-stable (S), 2-transient improvement (TI), 3-permanent improvement (PI), 4-transient worsening (TW), and 5-persistent worsening (PW). The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of 180 days including all causes of mortality and re-hospitalization. Results: We recruited 467 subjects with a mean congestion score of 3.5±1.08 and a median creatinine value of 1.28 (1.00-1.70) mg/dl, eGFR 50 (37-65) ml/min/m2 and NTpro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) 7,000 (4,200-11,700) pg/ml. A univariate analysis of the RF pattern demonstrated that TI and PW patterns were significantly related to poor prognosis [HR: 2.71 (1.81-4.05); p < 0.001; HR: 1.68 (1.15-2.45); p = 0.007, respectively]. Conversely, the TW pattern showed a significantly protective effect on outcome [HR:0.34 (0.19-0.60); p < 0.001]. Persistence of congestion and BNP reduction ≥ 30% were significantly related to clinical outcome at univariate analysis [HR: 2.41 (1.81-3.21); p < 0.001 and HR:0.47 (0.35-0.67); p < 0.001]. A multivariable analysis confirmed the independently prognostic role of TI, PW patterns, persistence of congestion, and reduced BNP decrease at discharge. Conclusions: Various RF patterns during AHF hospitalization are associated with different risk(s). PW and TI appear to be the two trajectories related to worse outcome. Current findings confirm the importance of RF evaluation during and after hospitalization.

Noncardiac comorbidity clustering in heart failure: an overlooked aspect with potential therapeutic door.

Heart failure is associated with a range of comorbidities that have the potential to impair both quality of life and clinical outcome. Unfortunately, noncardiac diseases are underrepresented in large randomized clinical trials, and their management remains poorly understood. In clinical practice, the prevalence of comorbidities in heart failure is high. Although the prognostic impact of comorbidities is well known, their prevalence and impact in specific heart failure settings have been overlooked. Many studies have described specific single noncardiac conditions, but few have examined their overall burden and grading in patients with multiple comorbidities. The risk of comorbidities in patients with heart failure rises with more advanced disease, older age, and increased frailty-three conditions that are poorly represented in clinical trials. The pathogenic links between comorbidities and heart failure involve many pathways and include neurohormonal overdrive, inflammatory activation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction. Such interactions may worsen prognoses, but details of these relationships are still under investigation. We propose a shift from cardiac-focused care to a more systemic approach that considers all noncardiac diseases and related medications. Some new drugs class such as ARNI or SGLT2 inhibitors could change prognosis by acting directly or indirectly on metabolic disorders and related vascular consequences.

Direct oral anticoagulants across the heart failure spectrum: the precision medicine era.

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by a pro-thrombotic state, which might aggravate its morbidity and, consequently, mortality. Several and commonly observed comorbidities, such as coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation (AF), renal dysfunction, and diabetes often complicate HF, increasing the thromboembolic risk. In the past decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the treatment and prevention of stroke and embolic events in patients with nonvalvular AF. Due to their lower bleeding risk, these drugs are frequently used instead of warfarin; however, some controversies exist on their use in HF patients with or without comorbidities. Indeed, the management of anticoagulation in HF patients with underlying conditions is poorly investigated since these patients are underrepresented or excluded from randomized controlled trials. The aim of this research is to review current evidence on the use of DOACs in HF patients, also discussing their specific use in different clinical scenarios. Graphical abstract.

Effects of Metolazone Administration on Congestion, Diuretic Response and Renal Function in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Advanced heart failure (HF) is a condition often requiring elevated doses of loop diuretics. Therefore, these patients often experience poor diuretic response. Both conditions have a detrimental impact on prognosis and hospitalization. AIMS: This retrospective, multicenter study evaluates the effect of the addition of oral metolazone on diuretic response (DR), clinical congestion, NTproBNP values, and renal function over hospitalization phase. Follow-up analysis for a 6-month follow-up period was performed. METHODS: We enrolled 132 patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in advanced NYHA class with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 40%) taking a mean furosemide amount of 250 ± 120 mg/day. Sixty-five patients received traditional loop diuretic treatment plus metolazone (Group M). The mean dose ranged from 7.5 to 15 mg for one week. Sixty-seven patients continued the furosemide (Group F). Congestion score was evaluated according to the ESC recommendations. DR was assessed by the formula diuresis/40 mg of furosemide. RESULTS: Patients in Group M and patients in Group F showed a similar prevalence of baseline clinical congestion (3.1 ± 0.7 in Group F vs. 3 ± 0.8 in Group M) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (51% in Group M vs. 57% in Group F; p = 0.38). Patients in Group M experienced a better congestion score at discharge compared to patients in Group F (C score: 1 ± 1 in Group M vs. 3 ± 1 in Group F p > 0.05). Clinical congestion resolution was also associated with weight reduction (-6 ± 2 in Group M vs. -3 ± 1 kg in Group F, p < 0.05). Better DR response was observed in Group M compared to F (940 ± 149 mL/40 mgFUROSEMIDE/die vs. 541 ± 314 mL/40 mgFUROSEMIDE/die; p < 0.01), whereas median ΔNTproBNP remained similar between the two groups (-4819 ± 8718 in Group M vs. -3954 ± 5560 pg/mL in Group F NS). These data were associated with better daily diuresis during hospitalization in Group M (2820 ± 900 vs. 2050 ± 1120 mL p < 0.05). No differences were found in terms of WRF development and electrolyte unbalance at discharge, although Group M had a significant saline solution administration during hospitalization. Follow-up analysis did not differ between the group but a reduced trend for recurrent hospitalization was observed in the M group (26% vs. 38%). CONCLUSIONS: Metolazone administration could be helpful in patients taking an elevated loop diuretics dose. Use of thiazide therapy is associated with better decongestion and DR. Current findings could suggest positive insights due to the reduced amount of loop diuretics in patients with advanced HF.

Non-cardiovascular comorbidities in heart failure patients and their impact on prognosis.

With the aging of the population and improvement of life expectancy of patients with heart disease, there is an increase in non-cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities affecting chronic heart failure (HF) patients. The increased prevalence of different CV and non-CV comorbidities is a rising problem in the management of patients with HF, mostly because these comorbidities may lead to poor prognosis, increase of hospitalizations and mortality rate. Recently, important data from multicenter randomized studies point to diabetes mellitus or iron deficiency as new pharmacological targets, and this highlights the need of broad expertise for the 21st-century cardiologist. The management of HF should take into account non-CV comorbidities. In this review, we discuss novel aspects of non-CV comorbidities in HF patients and emphasize the impact on prognosis.