Emergence delirium in children is not related to intraoperative burst suppression - prospective, observational electrography study.

BACKGROUND: Emergence-delirium is the most frequent brain dysfunction in children recovering from general anaesthesia, though the pathophysiological background remains unclear. The presented study analysed an association between emergence delirium and intraoperative Burst Suppression activity in the electroencephalogram, a period of very deep hypnosis during general anaesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, observational cohort study at the Charité - university hospital in Berlin / Germany children aged 0.5 to 8 years, undergoing planned surgery, were included between September 2015 and February 2017. Intraoperative bi-frontal electroencephalograms were recorded. Occurrence and duration of Burst Suppression periods were visually analysed. Emergence delirium was assessed using the Pediatric Assessment of Emergence Delirium Score. RESULTS: From 97 children being analysed within this study, 40 children developed emergence delirium, and 57 children did not. Overall 52% of the children displayed intraoperative Burst Suppression periods; however, occurrence and duration of Burst Suppression (Emergence delirium group 55% / 261 + 462 s vs. Non-emergence delirium group 49% / 318 + 531 s) did not differ significantly between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal no correlation between the occurrence and duration of intraoperative Burst Suppression activity and the incidence of emergence delirium. Burst Suppression occurrence is frequent; however, it does not seem to have an unfavourable impact on cerebral function at emergence from general anaesthesia in children. TRAIL REGISTRATION: NCT02481999, June 25, 2015.

Emergence delirium in children is related to epileptiform discharges during anaesthesia induction: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Epileptiform discharges frequently occur in children during induction of anaesthesia. However, studies analysing the impact of epileptiform discharges on postoperative emergence delirium in children are still scarce. The aim of this study is to correlate the incidence of epileptiform activity during anaesthesia induction with the occurrence of emergence delirium during stay in the recovery room. OBJECTIVES: Prospective, observational cohort study in children 0.5 to 8 years old undergoing planned surgery. Bifrontal electroencephalogram electrodes were placed before induction of anaesthesia. Visual electroencephalogram analysis was performed from start of anaesthetic agent administration until intubation with regard to epileptiform patterns: rhythmic polyspikes; periodic epileptiform discharges; delta with spikes; and suppression with spikes. Emergence delirium was assessed during stay in the recovery room using the Pediatric Assessment of Emergence Delirium Score. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: University hospital - Germany/Berlin. Children were included between September 2015 and February 2017. PATIENTS: A total of 62 Children, aged 0.5 to 8 years old undergoing planned surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was emergence delirium. Secondary outcomes, peri-operative Electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis. The presented study analysed an association between emergence delirium and the occurrence of epileptiform discharges during anaesthesia induction. RESULTS: A total of 43.5% of the children developed emergence delirium and 56.5% did not. Epileptiform discharges were observed more often in children developing emergence delirium (63%) compared with children not developing emergence delirium (43%). But only the occurrence of interictal spike events - such as rhythmic polyspikes; periodic epileptiform discharges and delta with spikes - were significantly related to emergence delirium (emergence delirium-group 48% vs. nonemergence delirium-group 14%, OR = 5.6 [95% CI: 1.7 to 18.7]; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Emergence delirium in children is significantly related to interictal spike events occurring during induction of anaesthesia. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT02481999.

Incidence of epileptiform discharges in children during induction of anaesthesia using Propofol versus Sevoflurane.

OBJECTIVE: In pediatric patients, anaesthesia induction is often performed with intravenous Propofol or Sevoflurane inhalation. Although epileptiform discharges have been observed during inductions with Sevoflurane, their occurrence has not been investigated for i.v. Propofol inductions. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of epileptiform discharges in children during anaesthesia induction using Propofol versus Sevoflurane. METHODS: Prospective, observational cohort study in children aged 0.5-8 years undergoing elective surgery. Children were anaesthetized with either Propofol or Sevoflurane. Bi-frontal electroencephalograms electrodes were placed before start of anaesthesia. Visual electroencephalogram analysis was performed from start of anesthetic agent administration until Intubation with regard to identify epileptiform patterns, i.e. delta with spikes; rhythmic polyspikes; periodic, epileptiform discharges; or suppression with spikes. RESULTS: 39 children were anaesthetized with Propofol, and 18 children with Sevoflurane. Epileptiform discharges were seen in 36% of the children in the Propofol group, versus 67% in the Sevoflurane group (p = 0.03). Incidence of the distinct types of epileptiform discharge differed for periodic, epileptiform discharges (Sevoflurane group 39% vs. Propofol group 3%; p < 0.001). Higher concentration of Remifentanil (≥0.15 µg/kg/min) was associated with less frequent epileptiform discharges (Exp 5.8; CI 95% 1.6/21.2; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol i.v. induction of anaesthesia in children triggers epileptiform discharges, whereas to a lesser extent than Sevoflurane does. SIGNIFICANCE: Presuming that epileptiform discharges have an impact on postoperative brain function, it is advisable to use Propofol rather than Sevoflurane and higher level of Remifentanil for anaesthesia induction in children.