[Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the kidneys]. / Multidetektorcomputertomographie (MDCT) der Nieren.

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) possesses distinct advantages for examination of the kidneys. It carries the potential of becoming the gold standard of diagnostic work-up and surgical planning for most renal diseases and replacing conventional methods such as i.v. urography and angiography. The most outstanding improvements, in comparison to single slice spiral CT, are the speedier image acquisition and enhanced z-axis resolution, which aids particularly in visualization of the urinary tract as it aligns along the axis of the body. Respiratory artifacts are few or nonexistent even in patients who cannot hold their breath. This overview presents a strategy for prudent management of MDCT examinations and describes examination of the most important and frequent renal diseases using MDCT.

Helical CT of the small bowel with an alternative oral contrast material in patients with Crohn disease.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the usefulness of helical computed tomography (CT) with a negative oral contrast material for detecting Crohn disease. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with proven Crohn disease were examined. We administered a large volume of a new negative oral contrast material (Mucofalk suspended in water) and then proceeded with helical CT scanning. This technique is an alternative to CT and conventional enteroclyses that use a nasojejunal tube. Two radiologists interpreted the scans, and patients were interviewed about their tolerance of the procedure. We created multiplanar reformatted images in all cases. Potential of small bowel distention by Mucofalk was evaluated by two observers on a three-point scale, and interobserver agreement was calculated with kappa statistics. RESULTS: All patients who underwent enteroclysis stated that CT was the more comfortable method, the taste of the peroral contrast medium was considered good by 52.6% and acceptable by 47.4%. Small bowel distention was excellent in 55% of cases, moderate in 26%, and poor in 19%, with an interoberserver agreement of 78%. CT findings correlated with enteroclysis in 27 patients who underwent both methods. Analysis of CT versus enteroclysis showed a sensitivity of 89% for CT versus 78% for small bowel enteroclysis. CONCLUSION: Mucofalk CT is a simple, rapid, noninvasive, and accurate method of evaluating extramucosal manifestations of Crohn disease. The tubeless procedure improved patients' comfort and decreased time, cost, and radiation exposure.

Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma of the liver: differentiation with multiphasic helical CT.

OBJECTIVE: Differences of attenuation and enhancement patterns in focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma were evaluated and quantified using triphasic single-slice helical CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasias in 27 patients and 18 hepatocellular adenomas in six patients were examined with helical CT. Quantitative evaluation included the following: attenuation of lesions, scar, and liver parenchyma during unenhanced, arterial (20 sec after injection), and portal venous phases (70 sec after injection); relative enhancement of lesions and liver (the ratio between attenuation in arterial phase and portal venous phase, respectively, and attenuation in unenhanced phase); and the prevalence of scar and its central vessel in focal nodular hyperplasia. RESULTS: The study showed no significant difference between mean attenuation values of focal nodular hyperplasia (mean +/- SD, 51.2 +/- 5.9 H) and hepatocellular adenoma (mean +/- SD, 56.3 +/- 7.8 H) in the unenhanced phase. In the arterial phase attenuation values were significantly higher in focal nodular hyperplasia (mean +/- SD, 117.9 +/- 15.1 H) than in hepatocellular adenoma (mean +/- SD, 80.1 +/- 10.5 H). In the portal venous phase no significant differences in attenuation values were detected between focal nodular hyperplasia (mean +/- SD, 112.1 +/- 20.4 H) and hepatocellular adenoma (mean +/- SD, 110.2 +/- 12.9 H). For enhancement parameter thresholds separating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma, the following were found: the relative enhancement was higher in 100% of the focal nodular hyperplasias and lower than or equal to 1.6 (accuracy, 96%) in 87% of the hepatocellular adenomas. CONCLUSION: Triphasic helical CT combined with quantitative evaluation of liver lesions offers the possibility of detecting differences in liver lesions that are visually similar on CT. The attenuation and relative enhancement in the arterial phase show significant differences that make accurate differentiation between focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma possible.

Giant liposarcoma of the esophagus: radiological findings.

This case of an esophageal liposarcoma illustrates a polypoid lesion within the esophagus that extended from the left pyriform sinus to the distal esophagus above the gastric cardia. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an inhomogenously-enhancing intraluminal mass, while video-fluoroscopy revealed that the mass was adherent to the esophageal wall and was associated with esophageal dilatation and diminished peristalsis. This ninth reported case of esophageal liposarcoma is the first described where preoperative radiologic studies and endoscopy showed broad fixation of the tumor to the esophageal wall.

[Acute appendicitis in non-contrast spiral CT: a diagnostic luxury or benefit?]. / Akute Appendizitis im Nicht-Kontrast-Spiral-CT: diagnostischer Luxus oder Nutzen?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of thin collimated unenhanced spiral-CT in patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis and to determine the impact on patient management and overall costs. METHOD: Unenhanced focussed appendiceal spiral-CT was performed in 56 patients (23 women and 33 men) with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. Scans were obtained from the L4 level to the symphysis pubis using 5 mm collimation, 7.5 mm table feed (pitch 1.5) and 4 mm increment without i.v., oral, or rectal contrast material. Prospective diagnoses based on CT findings were compared with surgical (and histopathological) results and clinical follow-up. The effect of spiral-CT on patient management and clinical resources was assessed. RESULTS: 29 patients (10 women and 19 men) underwent appendectomy. Unenhanced spiral-CT was an accurate imaging technique for the initial examination of patients with suspected acute appendicitis with a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity 100%, an accuracy of 98.2%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 97.1%. In 27 patients with no evidence of acute appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis could be made in 24 patients by unenhanced spiral-CT. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced spiral-CT is an accurate test to diagnose or to exclude acute appendicitis. Routine appendiceal spiral-CT can improve medical care and reduce the overall costs for patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.

[Native spiral computerized tomography in patients with acute flank pain--sense or nonsense?]. / Nativ-Spiral-Computertomographie bei Patienten mit akutem Flankenschmerz--Sinn oder Unsinn?

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy and costs of native spiral-CT and intravenous urography (IVU) in the management of patients with acute flank pain. METHOD: Native spiral-CT and IVU (following about 30 minutes after CT) were compared in 66 patients with acute flank pain followed by an IVU. The spiral-CT protocol was: 5-mm section thickness, 7.5-mm table feed and 3-mm increment. The analysis conducted independently by two radiologists entailed: (a) Morphology: presence of stone disease (yes-no), localization and size of calculi, periureteral and perirenal stranding, dilatation of the collecting system, and possible alternative diagnoses and (b) cost-effectiveness: direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients had urolithiasis. The detection rate of renal and ureteric calculi was significantly higher with native spiral-CT than with IVU (100% vs. 69%, respectively) (p < 0.05). A specific sign of ureteric calculi was the so-called soft tissue "rim sign" (sensitivity 82% and specificity 100%, respectively). In 13 of 14 patients with acute flank pain with no evidence of urolithiasis alternative diagnoses could be made by spiral-CT. Spiral-CT was significantly more cost-effective than IVU in management. CONCLUSION: Native spiral-CT is faster, more effective and less expensive than IVU in the management of patients with acute flank pain. Additionally, it poses less risk and has the capability for allowing alternative diagnoses. Therefore, unenhanced spiral-CT should be the first line modality in patients with acute flank pain.