Early detection of severe injuries after major trauma by immediate total-body CT scouts.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of immediate total-body CT (iTBCT) scouts during primary trauma care could be clinically relevant for early detection and treatment of specific major injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of TBCT scouts in detecting life-threatening chest and pelvic injuries. METHODS: All patients who underwent an iTBCT during their primary trauma assessment in one trauma center between April 2011 and November 2014 were retrospectively included. Two experienced trauma surgeons and two emergency radiologists evaluated iTBCT scouts with structured questionnaires. Inter-observer agreement and diagnostic properties were calculated for endotracheal tube position and identification of pneumo- and/or hemothorax and pelvic fractures. Diagnostic properties of iTBCT scouts for indication for chest tube placement and pelvic binder application were calculated in comparison to decision based on iTBCT. RESULTS: In total 220 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR 26-59) were selected with a median Injury Severity Score of 18 (IQR 9-27). There was moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement and low false positive rates for pneumo- and/or hemothorax and for severe pelvic fractures by iTBCT scouts. For 19.8%-22.5% of the endotracheal intubated patients trauma surgeons stated that repositioning of the tube was indicated. Positive predictive value and sensitivity were respectively 100% (95%CI 52%-100%) and 50% (95%CI 22%-78%) for decisions on chest tube placement by trauma surgeon 1 and 67% (95%CI 13%-98%) and 22% (95%CI 4%-60%) for decisions by trauma surgeon 2. Only in one of 14 patients the pelvic binder was applied after iTBCT acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: iTBCT scouts can be useful for early detection of pneumo- and/or hemothorax and severe pelvic fractures. Decision for chest tube placement based on iTBCT scouts alone is not recommended.

Functional and oncological outcome after surgical resection of the scapula and clavicle for primary chondrosarcoma.

PURPOSE: The scapula is a relatively common site for chondrosarcoma to develop in contrary to the clavicle, which is rarely affected by these tumors. The aim of this study is to determine the functional and oncological outcome for patients treated operatively for scapular or clavicular chondrosarcoma. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we included a sample of 20 patients that received the diagnosis of a primary chondrosarcoma of the scapula or clavicle. Of the surviving patients, the functional function was assessed using the DASH and the PROMIS Physical Function-Upper Extremity. Patients were longitudinally tracked for their oncological outcome. RESULTS: All patients were followed for at least 2 years or until death. The mean age of the cohort was 47 years. Eighteen patients suffered from a chondrosarcoma of the scapula, and in 2 patients, the tumor was located in the clavicle. Metastasis, local recurrence and a higher tumor grade were all associated with a decreased overall survival. For the patients with a chondrosarcoma of the scapula, the average DASH score was 16 ± 16 and the mean PROMIS Physical Function-Upper Extremity score was 48 ± 10. Patients with both an intact rotator cuff and glenoid had a better physical function. CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity function after (partial) scapulectomy varied depending on whether the glenoid was spared and whether a functioning shoulder abductor remained. When the resection spared these structures, then excellent functional outcomes were reported. Oncologic outcomes depended upon the grade of the tumor and whether local recurrence and metastases occurred.

Incidental findings on total-body CT scans in trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Total-body Computed Tomography (CT) scans are increasingly used in trauma care. Herewith the observation of incidental findings, trauma unrelated findings, is also increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of incidental findings in adult trauma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive trauma patients that underwent total-body CT scanning between January 2009 and December 2011 were analysed. Incidental findings were divided in three categories: category I (potentially severe condition, further diagnostic work-up is required), category II (diagnostic work-up dependent on patients' symptoms) and category III (findings of minor concern, no diagnostic work-up required). RESULTS: There were 2248 trauma room presentations; 321 patients underwent a total-body CT scan (14.3%). In 143 patients (44.5%), 186 incidental findings were reported. There were 13 category I findings (7.0%), 45 category II findings (24.2%) and 128 category III incidental findings (68.8%). Overall, 18 patients (5.6%) required additional diagnostic work-up. Four patients underwent work-up by additional radiologic imaging. Three patients required further invasive work-up or treatment. Three patients were transferred to another hospital, no extended follow-up was performed. In three patients, there was no documentation of follow-up. Five patients deceased before diagnostic work-up of the incidental finding could start. CONCLUSION: Total-body CT scanning as part of the evaluation of trauma patients leads to a substantial amount of incidental findings. Documentation of incidental findings and their clinical consequences was incomplete. Therefore, the findings of this study have prompted us to add an item to our electronic trauma room report that obliges residents to report whether or not incidental findings are found during trauma imaging.