Gender, racial and ethnic disparities in index hospitalization operations for symptomatic carotid stenosis in Texas hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature and societal recommendations support early revascularization of symptomatic carotid patients over the traditional six-week period. Nonetheless, the timing of these interventions can vary widely among populations. The goal of this study is to identify any factors influencing carotid revascularization during the index hospitalization for patients with symptomatic disease. METHODS: The Texas Department of State Health Services database was queried to identify all patients > 45 years old admitted to nonfederal Texas Hospitals between 2009 to 2013 with an admission diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis and either transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), or amaurosis fugax. Diagnoses codes and demographic data were also used to adjust for clinical, social, and demographic factors (including area of residence and treatment). Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify significant factors for index admission revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 29,046 symptomatic patients were identified among the 153,484 patients who had an eligible admission diagnosis. This included 16,244 (55.9%) males and 12,802 (44.1%) females. Only 4,594 (15.8%) patients were revascularized during the index hospitalization. The majority of these patients presented with amaurosis (OR 5.58; 95% CI 4.84-6.44) instead of CVAs (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.45-0.51) or TIAs . Adjusting for hospital volume, insurance coverage, residence, and other clinical factors, rates of index admission carotid intervention remained significantly lower for women (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.91), persons categorized as black (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.53-0.69), and persons categorized as Hispanic (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.70-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Gender, race and ethnicity appear to correlate with rates of carotid intervention at index hospitalization despite thorough risk adjustment for clinical, social and demographic factors. Efforts should be directed towards reducing these disparities.

Reliability of preoperative venous mapping ultrasonography in predicting for autogenous arteriovenous fistula maturation.

BACKGROUND: Autogenous arteriovenous fistula creation is the preferred route for vascular access for hemodialysis. Although preoperative venous mapping ultrasonography has been advocated as an operative planning adjunct and recently incorporated into the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical guidelines, controversy remains regarding its usefulness for predicting access success. The purpose of the present retrospective clinical study was to test the hypothesis that vein size measured on routine preoperative venous mapping is a poor predictor of primary fistula maturation. METHODS: Consecutive upper extremity autogenous arteriovenous fistulas created by three dedicated vascular surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic characteristics, preoperative venous mapping, functional maturation, and patency were analyzed. The clinically relevant variables were tested for predictive significance using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 199 upper extremity autogenous arteriovenous fistulas had been created during a 5-year period. Patients were aged 70 ± 16 years (range, 20-96 years), and 62% were men. Most had already been undergoing dialysis before fistula creation (83%), usually via a tunneled central venous catheter (62%). Radial-cephalic, brachial-cephalic, and brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistulas had been created in 82 patients (41%), 76 patients (38%), and 10 patients (5%), respectively. Fistula maturation, defined as a palpable thrill and/or successful cannulation of the fistula with the ability to deliver a flow rate of 400 mL/min, was achieved in 67% of the patients. A higher body mass index was associated with nonmaturation on both univariate and multivariate analyses (success, 28.6 ± 7.7 kg/m2; vs failed, 31.6 ± 9.4 kg/m2; P = .029; odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.10; P < .01). On univariate analysis, the maximum target vein diameter assessed by preoperative venous mapping was slightly larger in the group achieving successful maturation (2.9 ± 1.1 mm vs 2.6 ± 0.9 mm; P = .014). However, neither the maximum target vein diameter nor a target vein size >3 mm was significantly predictive of maturation on multivariate analysis (maximum vein diameter: OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.22; P = .176; vein size >3 mm: OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.32-2.60; P = .857). After a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range, 26 months), the primary functional patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 39.1% ± 0.6%, 94.5% ± 0.6%, and 97.9% ± 0.5%. No association of vein diameter with long-term patency was found. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the national fistula-first initiatives, most patients still undergo access via catheter at the initiation of hemodialysis. The use of routine preoperative venous mapping does not predict successful primary maturation. Also, no clinically useful predictor of fistula maturation was identified in the present study.