Association of Area Deprivation Index with Adherence to Proposed Regimen in Patients with Sarcoidosis in Detroit, Michigan.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Social predictors affect severity of sarcoidosis, with Black patients, older individuals, those with lower income, and those without insurance having greater severity. This study aimed to explore potential disparities affecting access to care in sarcoidosis patients with a primary focus on metrics such as area deprivation index (ADI) and its association with adherence to the proposed regimen. METHODS: A retrospective chart review study of all patients seen in pulmonary clinics at a large urban tertiary care center over 2 years with sarcoidosis patients identified with International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code D86. Data collected included age, race, sex, ADI, insurance, online patient portal usage, chest x-rays, pulmonary function tests, missed visits, hospitalizations, positive biopsy, communication and visits around bronchoscopy. Categorical variables were described using frequency and percentage. Numerical variables were described using median, mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis included chi-square test, two-sample T-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to model independent association with 12 month no-show occurrence as a metric of adherence to the proposed regimen. RESULTS: Among sarcoidosis patients (N = 788), univariate models showed the presence of active online patient portal use among younger patients (58.6 years with portal vs. 65.1 years without portal, p < 0.001), those with lower ADI (73 with portal vs. 92 without portal, p < 0.001) and with commercial insurance (48.5% with portal vs. 20.7% without portal, p < 0.001); more x-rays (45.6% with x-rays vs. 36.6% without x-rays, p = 0.018) and hospitalizations (50.3% with hospitalizations vs. 36.2% without hospitalizations, p < 0.001) in Medicare patients. Sarcoidosis patients with positive biopsies on file from 2013-2023 were more likely to be male (44.19% with positive biopsy vs. 33.91% without positive biopsy, p = 0.006), White (36.29% with positive biopsy vs. 22.9% without positive biopsy, p < 0.001) or other races (3.23% with positive biopsy vs. 2.25% without positive biopsy, p < 0.001), younger (55.8 years with positive biopsy vs. 61.7 years without positive biopsy, p < 0.001) and belonged to lower national ADI ranks (73 with positive biopsy vs. 80 without biopsy, p = 0.041). A multivariate analysis was done with those variables found to be significant in the univariate analyses, which revealed that higher ADI national was associated with failure to adhere to the proposed regimen. CONCLUSIONS: We identified intricate patterns of sociodemographic variables affecting access to care in sarcoidosis patients, especially higher ADI national associated with failure to adhere to the proposed regimen, raising concerns for potential healthcare barriers. Understanding these barriers is vital for equitable high-quality care, assisting in timely and efficient management of the patient's disease.

Compression wraps as adjuvant therapy in the management of acute systolic heart failure.

Background: Guidelines recommend targeting decongestion in management of decompensated HF, with lower extremity edema often serving as the clinical target. LECW are seldom used in the acute setting, with a paucity of data on efficacy in HF, despite serving as a cornerstone of chronic lymphedema management. Primary objective: Study the efficacy and safety of LECW in acute decompensated HF. Methods: Open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Primary outcomes: Days on intravenous (IV) diuretic therapy, total hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day all-cause readmission. Results: 32 patients were enrolled, with 29 patients completing the study. Enrollment was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall LOS was shorter in the intervention group (3.5 vs 6 days, p = 0.05), with no significant difference in total days on IV diuresis or 30-day readmission rate with use of LECW. Fewer patients required continuous diuretic infusion after treatment with LECW (0 vs 7 patients, p = 0.027). The intervention group scored significantly better on the MLWHF (55.5 vs 65, p = 0.021), including both the physical and emotional dimension scores. No adverse events were reported with use of LECW, including a significantly lower incidence of AKI (1 vs 13 patients, p = 0.005). Conclusion: The use of LECW resulted in reduced hospital LOS compared to standard therapy, with no difference in days of IV diuresis administration or 30-day readmission. Treatment with LECW also resulted in less continuous IV diuretic therapy, fewer incidence of AKI, and improved quality of life. Trends toward less escalation of diuresis, and greater reduction in edema were also observed.

Cardio-Rheumatology: Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Inflammatory Disorders.

Inflammation plays a well-established role in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. Individuals exposed to chronic inflammation are at an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease and heart failure, independent of associated traditional risk factors. Traditional risk assessment tools and calculators underestimate the true cardiac risk in this population. In addition to this, there is a lack of awareness on the association between inflammation and cardiovascular disease. These factors lead to undertreatment in terms of preventive cardiac care in patients with chronic inflammatory disease.

A Clinical Guide to Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We provide an overview of our current understanding of combination lipid-lowering therapies intended for dyslipidemia treatment and cardiovascular disease prevention. First, we analyze recent statin and non-statin combination therapy guidelines and clinical studies since the publication of 2013 American College of Cardiology Cholesterol Guidelines. Second, we examine the clinical utility of non-statin agents alone and in combination in terms of LDL-C lowering and ASCVD risk reduction. RECENT FINDINGS: Medical societies, including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), National Lipid Association (NLA), and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), have released guidelines to address the appropriate use of non-statin therapies. The guidelines incorporated new evidence, including the IMPROVE-IT and FOURIER clinical trials, which demonstrate that the combination of statin therapy with other non-statin agents such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors has a significant clinical benefit. Increasing evidence that aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering leads to lower cardiovascular disease risk supports the need for continued exploration of the role of combination lipid-lowering therapies. A review of guidelines and clinical trials evaluating non-statin agents illuminates the growing base of evidence and expert opinion supporting the use of combination lipid-lowering therapies. While the majority of clinical trial data utilizes dyslipidemia monotherapy, especially statins, combination therapies represent an opportunity for individualized, patient-centered approach to LDL-C lowering and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction. The overview provides a perspective on lipid management intended for clinicians who seek additional information and guidance on the use of combination therapies.