R-Duloxetine and N-Methyl Duloxetine as Novel Analgesics Against Experimental Postincisional Pain.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressant S-duloxetine alleviates intractable pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and fibromyalgia. It also reduces both acute and persistent pain in various animal models. This study addresses whether the enantiomer, R-duloxetine, and the homolog, N-methyl duloxetine, could act as analgesics and whether they block neuronal Na⁺ channels. METHODS: The rat incision plus extension model on the dorsothoracic skin was applied to evoke postoperative mechanoallodynia and hyperalgesia, measured for 5 days postoperatively by local responses to von Frey filaments. R-Duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine were administered systemically (intraperitoneal) or locally (subcutaneous [SC]) 1 hour before the surgery. The block of Na currents in rat neuronal GH3 cells was determined under the whole-cell configuration. RESULTS: Ipsilateral SC injections (2 mg/0.4 mL) of R-duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine reduced both postoperative allodynia and hyperalgesia by approximately 89% to 99% in the area under the curve of skin responses next to incision over 5 days. Systemic intraperitoneal injections at a higher dosage (10 mg) had smaller analgesic effects (reduced by approximately 53%-69%), whereas contralateral SC injections (10 mg) were ineffective. Both R-duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine blocked neuronal Na⁺ currents, with a higher affinity for the inactivated than the resting states. In addition, both drugs elicited significant use-dependent block of Na currents when stimulated at 5 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: R-Duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine are highly effective against postoperative pain using the skin incision model, and they elicit both tonic and use-dependent block of neuronal Na⁺ channels. Our results suggest that R-duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine are applicable as novel analgesics.

The Local and Systemic Actions of Duloxetine in Allodynia and Hyperalgesia Using a Rat Skin Incision Pain Model.

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine is an antidepressant effective for major depressive disorder and also the alleviation of pain for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, chronic musculoskeletal pain, and fibromyalgia. How duloxetine works in pain relief remains unknown. In this study, we address whether duloxetine could act as an analgesic via systemic and local applications. METHODS: Efficacies of bupivacaine and duloxetine applied subcutaneously at the incision site against acute postoperative pain were compared after rat skin incision. Contralateral and intraperitoneal injections were used to assess systemic efficacy of duloxetine. Local anesthetic actions were assayed through functional block of the rat sciatic nerve. Inhibition by duloxetine of neuronal Na channels was characterized in rat GH3 cells. RESULTS: Our studies showed that subcutaneous duloxetine (2 mg) reduced hyperalgesia and allodynia for several days after skin incision, whereas subcutaneous bupivacaine (2 mg) did not. Contralaterally injected duloxetine (10 mg) had minimal effects on postoperative pain. Intraperitoneal duloxetine also reduced both allodynia and hyperalgesia, albeit at higher doses (10-20 mg). Duloxetine (2 mg) inhibited motor and nociceptive functions via sciatic nerve block for approximately 24 hours. It also reduced Na currents with 50% inhibitory concentrations of 30.4 ± 1.2 µM and 4.26 ± 0.19 µM (n = 8) for resting and fast-inactivated channels, respectively. Furthermore, duloxetine (10 µM) elicited additional use-dependent block of peak Na currents by approximately 70% when stimulated at 5 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that duloxetine can act as a local anesthetic and an analgesic drug via both local and systemic applications. Because duloxetine inhibits neuronal Na currents with high potency, it may exert its antihyperalgesic effects through inhibition of the spontaneous nerve impulses that result from peripheral injury, encompassing its actions on multiple central nervous system and peripheral targets.

Persistent human cardiac Na+ currents in stably transfected mammalian cells: Robust expression and distinct open-channel selectivity among Class 1 antiarrhythmics.

Miniature persistent late Na(+) currents in cardiomyocytes have been linked to arrhythmias and sudden death. The goals of this study are to establish a stable cell line expressing robust persistent cardiac Na(+) currents and to test Class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs for selective action against resting and open states. After transient transfection of an inactivation-deficient human cardiac Na(+) channel clone (hNav1.5-CW with L409C/A410W double mutations), transfected mammalian HEK293 cells were treated with 1 mg/ml G-418. Individual G-418-resistant colonies were isolated using glass cylinders. One colony with high expression of persistent Na(+) currents was subjected to a second colony selection. Cells from this colony remained stable in expressing robust peak Na(+) currents of 996 ± 173 pA/pF at +50 mV (n = 20). Persistent late Na(+) currents in these cells were clearly visible during a 4-second depolarizing pulse albeit decayed slowly. This slow decay is likely due to slow inactivation of Na(+) channels and could be largely eliminated by 5 µM batrachotoxin. Peak cardiac hNav1.5-CW Na(+) currents were blocked by tetrodotoxin with an IC(50) value of 2.27 ± 0.08 µM (n = 6). At clinic relevant concentrations, Class 1 antiarrhythmics are much more selective in blocking persistent late Na(+) currents than their peak counterparts, with a selectivity ratio ranging from 80.6 (flecainide) to 3 (disopyramide). We conclude that (1) Class 1 antiarrhythmics differ widely in their resting- vs. open-channel selectivity, and (2) stably transfected HEK293 cells expressing large persistent hNav1.5-CW Na(+) currents are suitable for studying as well as screening potent open-channel blockers.