Perioperative diabetes management of adult patients with diabetes: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this project were to conduct a retrospective healthcare records audit to determine the current compliance with evidence-based criteria regarding perioperative management of patients with diabetes; to identify barriers and facilitators to achieve compliance and develop strategies to address areas of non-compliance, and to implement evidence-based best practice recommendations for perioperative diabetic management and to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in improving compliance of perioperative diabetic management across five participating clinical areas in a large tertiary referral hospital. INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes is a frequent co-morbidity among inpatients. It affects up to 20% of the general surgical population. Patients with diabetes undergoing surgery have a greater complication rate and length of hospital stay. Optimization of diabetes management of hospitalized patients will improve quality of care delivery, prevent postoperative complications and reduce length of stay and costs. However, there is limited knowledge and understanding of whether the current nursing practices concerning perioperative diabetic management meet the best practice recommendations outlined by JBI best practice criteria. METHODS: A pre-post intervention healthcare record audit was conducted to examine compliance with nine best practice recommendations for perioperative diabetic management across five clinical areas. Following pre-intervention data analysis along with two focus group discussions, barriers to compliance with best practice criteria were identified and targeted strategies were used to address the issues. This project used the JBI Practice Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools. RESULTS: Face to face education sessions and educational resources relating to perioperative diabetic management were delivered to nursing staff, which resulted in improved compliance for most of the audit criteria, with significant improvement in the areas of regular blood glucose level monitoring and nursing staff receiving education and training in the post-implementation analysis.

A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has risen in recent decades, with significant variation within countries and between hospitals. The aim of this study was to review research supporting indications for IOL and determine which indications are supported by evidence and where knowledge gaps exist. METHODS: A systematic scoping review of quantitative studies of common indications for IOL. For each indication, we included systematic reviews/meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case control studies that compared maternal and neonatal outcomes for different modes or timing of birth. Studies were identified via the databases PubMed, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from between April 2008 and November 2019, and also from reference lists of included studies. We identified 2554 abstracts and reviewed 300 full text articles. The quality of included studies was assessed using the RoB 2.0, the ROBINS-I and the ROBIN tool. RESULTS: 68 studies were included which related to post-term pregnancy (15), hypertension/pre-eclampsia (15), diabetes (9), prelabour rupture of membranes (5), twin pregnancy (5), suspected fetal compromise (4), maternal elevated body mass index (BMI) (4), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (3), suspected macrosomia (3), fetal gastroschisis (2), maternal age (2), and maternal cardiac disease (1). Available evidence supports IOL for women with post-term pregnancy, although the evidence is weak regarding the timing (41 versus 42 weeks), and for women with hypertension/preeclampsia in terms of improved maternal outcomes. For women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (24-37 weeks), high-quality evidence supports expectant management rather than IOL/early birth. Evidence is weakly supportive for IOL in women with term rupture of membranes. For all other indications, there were conflicting findings and/or insufficient power to provide definitive evidence. CONCLUSIONS: While for some indications, IOL is clearly recommended, a number of common indications for IOL do not have strong supporting evidence. Overall, few RCTs have evaluated the various indications for IOL. For conditions where clinical equipoise regarding timing of birth may still exist, such as suspected macrosomia and elevated BMI, researchers and funding agencies should prioritise studies of sufficient power that can provide quality evidence to guide care in these situations.

Hypoglycaemia on an oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy - Is it clinically significant?

AIM: During pregnancy, some women have a low glucose level on the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The implications of this are unclear and there is no guideline on how to manage these women. METHOD: We recruited pregnant women with a glucose level <3.5 mmol/L at 1- or 2-h during a screening antenatal OGTT. These women (Group 1) underwent self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) over a two-week period. We also compared Group 1's demographic and pregnancy outcomes data with women who had normal OGTT results (Group 2) and women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (Group 3). RESULTS: 52 women were recruited. Post-hoc analysis of the SMBG results revealed 50% of women experienced 2 or more elevated fasting BGLs (>5.1 mmol/L) in a week when using the Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) criteria. A further 8% women had elevated 2-h glucose levels (above 6.7 mmol/L). Group 1 women tended to have higher booking weight. They were less likely to have a history of macrosomia or be of East or South-East Asian ethnicity. There were no differences in pregnancy outcomes between Groups 1 and 2, but Group 1 had a higher rate of congenital abnormality (6%) than Group 3 (2%). CONCLUSION: A large proportion of pregnant women who had a low glucose level on OGTT had elevated glucose levels on SMBG, however their pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different to women who had a normal OGTT. Currently there is not enough evidence to advocate routine SMBG and treatment for this group of women.

Adopting the new World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: How the prevalence changes in a high-risk region in Australia.

AIMS: In this study, we assessed changes in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a region with diverse cultural backgrounds in Australia under the new World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria, with reference to the woman's ethnicity, age and pre-pregnant body mass index (BMI). METHODS: We recorded results of all 75-gram oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) performed on pregnant women between February and December 2015 together with their demographic details, and determined the prevalence of GDM based on the old Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) and the new WHO criteria respectively. RESULTS: Over that period, 2140 OGTTs were performed in 1725 pregnant women. The prevalence of GDM was 14.8% (255/1725 women) under old ADIPS criteria, but went up to 29.6% (510/1725) when using WHO criteria. An increase in prevalence was observed in all ethnic groups. Women from East/South-East Asia had the lowest increment (from 19.2 to 22.3%) while those from South Asia had the highest (from 22.0 to 44.4%). Prevalence of GDM was 45.9% amongst women with BMI>30kg/m2. For women from South Asia with BMI>30kg/m2, 70.0% would have GDM. Birth outcomes were similar between women who would have GDM under WHO but not the old ADIPS criteria (untreated), and those who were treated for GDM under old criteria. CONCLUSION: In parts of Australia, adoption of WHO diagnostic criteria could result in doubling of the prevalence of GDM, depending on the women's demographic characteristics. Women from South Asia or those with obesity should be targeted for pre-pregnant lifestyle intervention.

Urine albumin-creatinine ratio in women with gestational diabetes: its link with glycaemic status.

BACKGROUND: Micro-albuminuria has been established as a marker for micro-vascular disease. Spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), even in the high normal range, predicts future cardiovascular events. The value of UACR in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy is uncertain. AIM: The objectives of this study were to assess the associations between UACR (performed at the time of GDM diagnosis) and various maternal parameters and to evaluate its correlation with pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of women with GDM who attended antenatal clinics at a single centre between March 2010 and September 2013. RESULTS: Among 1015 women included in this study, high UACR levels were associated with advancing maternal age, maternal obesity, gestational hypertension, elevated glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and high fasting glucose level. After adjustments for various maternal factors, only advancing age, HbA1c and fasting glucose level were associated with UACR. In terms of pregnancy outcomes, elevated UACR was not associated with adverse events, but was a predictor for pre-eclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that UACR was associated with glycaemic status in women with GDM suggests early micro-vascular disease may be present in women who had greater degree of hyperglycaemia. This raises the question of whether women with GDM and elevated UACR may be at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the future. Long-term follow-up of this subgroup of women would be worthwhile.

Weight gain during pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes: How little is too little?

We evaluated maternal weight gain in women with gestational diabetes, and assessed their compliance with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) weight gain targets. Only 28% of women achieved the IOM targets, with 40% gaining inadequate weight. Those who gained inadequate weight did not suffer any increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Women with pre-existing diabetes under the care of diabetes specialist prior to pregnancy: are their outcomes better?

In this retrospective study, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes under the care of diabetes specialists pre-conception were found to have better glycaemic control and pregnancy outcomes than those not under specialist care prior to pregnancy. These differences were not seen in women with type 2 diabetes. The study showed that tight glycaemic control in women with pre-existing diabetes was associated with better pregnancy outcomes, and we believe women with type 1 diabetes should be managed by a diabetes specialist before pregnancy.

Assessing the influences on therapeutic intensification in type 2 diabetes mellitus according to career stage.

AIM: This study was designed to document the factors influencing therapeutic decisions in the management of diabetes in relation to stage of medical career. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed among medical students, resident medical officers (RMOs) and general practitioners (GPs) presenting a hypothetical case of a 58 year old patient with sub-optimally controlled diabetes on metfomin and gliclazide. Participants were then asked for their next step in management and about factors that would influence their decision-making. RESULTS: GPs (n=72) were most likely to add pioglitazone (33.3%). RMOs (n=42) were more likely to add insulin (47.6%, p<0.01 vs. GPs). Medical students (n=40) were more likely to review diet and observe (42.5%, p<0.01 vs. GPs). Significant differences were observed between the 3 groups in what influenced their choice of therapy. GPs were most likely to take into account patient related factors such as patient's motivation to improve glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: GPs were less likely to initiate insulin therapy, and our results suggest that this may be due to their greater awareness of patient related barriers to commencing insulin. These results justify support for continuing medical education of GPs that focuses on evidence based guidelines.