Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery.

Guidelines are presented for the organisational and clinical management of anaesthesia for day-case surgery in adults and children. The advice presented is based on previously published recommendations, clinical studies and expert opinion.

Intra-articular and portal infiltration versus wrist block for analgesia after arthroscopy of the wrist: a prospective RCT.

Wrist block has been used to provide pain relief for many procedures on the hand and wrist but its role in arthroscopy of the wrist remains unexplored. Chondrotoxicity has been a concern with the intra-articular infiltration of local anaesthetic. We aimed to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of portal and wrist joint infiltration with a wrist block on the pain experienced by patients after arthroscopy of the wrist. A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was designed and patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist under general anaesthesia as a day case were recruited for the study. Levo-bupivacaine was used for both techniques. The effects were evaluated using a ten-point visual analogue scale, and the use of analgesic agents was also compared. The primary outcomes for statistical analyses were the mean pain scores and the use of analgesia post-operatively. A total of 34 patients (63% females) were recruited to the portal and joint infiltration group and 32 patients (59% males) to the wrist block group. Mean age was 40.8 years in the first group and 39.7 years in the second group (p > 0.05). Both techniques provided effective pain relief in the first hour and 24 hours post-operatively but wrist block gave better pain scores at bedtime on the day of surgery (p = 0.007) and at 24 hours post-operatively (p = 0.006). Wrist block provides better and more reliable analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist without exposing patients to the risk of chondrotoxicity.

Upper limb blocks.

This article discusses recent innovations and changes in practice in upper limb regional anaesthesia, dividing the blocks into those performed above the clavicle, those performed in the area of the clavicle and those performed below it. It offers a critical appraisal of the current status with regard to the use of ultrasound nerve location for upper limb regional anaesthesia and, while accepting that the use of ultrasound in this way has many theoretical advantages and will therefore continue to grow, concludes that there is currently insufficient published evidence to determine conclusively that the use of this technique is associated with nerve blocks that are more successful or safer.

Interscalene brachial plexus block: assessment of the needle angle needed to enter the spinal canal.

Attempts were made to place 8-cm 22G needles into the spinal canals of four preserved cadavers using the skin entry point most commonly associated with the lateral interscalene brachial plexus block or Winnie approach (that is, at the level of the cricoid cartilage). Eleven successful attempts were confirmed by computed tomography. Needle angles that were cephalad, transverse or slightly caudad were associated with entry into the spinal canal at depths of 5.0 cm or less from the skin. The only needle entry into the spinal canal with a needle angle of > 50 degrees to the transverse plane (< 40 degrees to the sagittal plane) entered the intervertebral foramen at a depth of 7.7 cm from the skin. We conclude that the use of markedly caudad angulations of needles no longer than 5.0 cm may minimise the chances of spinal canal entry and spinal cord damage.

Postoperative shoulder surgery initiative (POSSI): an interim report of major shoulder surgery as a day case procedure.

BACKGROUND: There are logistical and financial advantages to undertaking shoulder surgery in a day case setting. However, this approach is limited by postoperative pain being inadequately controlled by oral medication alone. We describe a pilot study investigating the feasibility and acceptance of community based continuous interscalene brachial plexus blockade (CIBPB) to provide effective analgesia for day case shoulder surgery. METHODS: Phase 1 consisted of five patients who received CIBPB for shoulder surgery. Following an overnight hospital stay they were assessed for discharge home with the interscalene catheter in situ. Once the safety and feasibility of the approach was documented, five more patients were recruited to Phase 2. These patients had the adequacy of analgesia assessed in the postoperative period and were discharged home on the same day as surgery. A district nurse visited twice daily and removed the catheter on the third day. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a discovery interview. RESULTS: Nine of the 10 patients experienced good analgesia. One patient was re-admitted because the catheter fell out. No patient experienced complications and the discovery interviews showed that the patients were satisfied with their management and pleased to be treated as a day case. CONCLUSIONS: POSSI proved that it was feasible to manage these patients in the community with support and training of the district nurses. Although extra community nursing hours are required, this technique has the potential for significant cost benefits with at least three bed days saved per patient.