Ureterovesical Leak Following Renal Transplant and Effects of Acute Rejection and Antirejection Therapy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis and Outcome of 1102 Consecutive Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Studies on nontechnical risk factors for ureterovesical leak after renal transplant are scarce. This study aimed to report the possible pre- and postoperative risk factors and the role of acute rejection and antirejection therapies for urine leak after transplant and its effect on graft and patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13 patients (1.17%) with urine leak (case group) and 52 patients without leak (control group) (case-to-control ratio of 1:4) from 1102 living related (first degree) renal transplant recipients seen between January 2012 and December 2021. We analyzed demographic and clinical details and biochemical and outcome parameters using a nested case-control design. RESULTS: Cases were olderthan controls (P = .018), were more ABO incompatible (P = .009), and had more 6/6 HLA mismatch transplants (P = .047). Donors of cases were older than donors of controls (P = .049). The rate of postoperative hypoalbuminemia was greaterin the case group (P = .050). Rates of acute rejection (P = .012) and plasmapheresis (P = .003) were greaterin the case group than in the control group. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, recipient age, 6/6 HLA mismatch, and plasmapheresis were found to independently associated with urine leak. None ofthe patient required surgical repair, as all responded to conservative therapy. Urine leak did not affect graft outcomes (P = .324), but overall survival was less in cases than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Nontechnical risk factors that cause posttransplant ureteric leak include older donor and recipient age and ABO incompatible and 6/6 HLA mismatch transplants. Acute rejection and plasmapheresis predispose leak, and an indwelling double J stent can allow adequate healing of the anastomosis. High index of suspicion and prompt management are imperative to preserve graft and patient outcome.

Does Radical Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Improve Overall Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of radical local treatment (RLT) on overall survival (OS) and other survival outcomes in patients with OligoMetastatic Prostate Cancer (OMPC). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases until May 2023. We included RCTs that randomized patients to RLT (either radical prostatectomy [RP] or external beam radiotherapy [EBRT]) and standard of care and reported on OMPC. Our primary objective was to analyze OS with a minimum median follow-up of 4years (PROSPERO-CRD42023422736). RESULTS: We analyzed 3 RCTs, presenting data across 5 papers. OS was significantly higher in the RLT group (HR - 0.643, 95%CI 0.514-0.8, P-value <.001). The data on EBRT was drawn from 520 patients and that of RP was from 85. The post-hoc power analysis showed 81% power to detect a difference of 10% with an alpha error of 0.01. Pooled prevalence of grade 3-4 bowel and bladder toxicity was 4.5%. Health-Related Quality of Life was similar in both groups (mean difference - 1.54, 95%CI -0.625 -3.705, P-value .163). The risk of bias as per the RoB2 tool was low for all domains and overall bias. As per GRADE criteria, the certainty of evidence was high. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis underscores the evidence-based significance of RLT, particularly emphasizing the benefits of EBRT in patients with OMPC. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies and the relatively small sample sizes, especially in the RP subgroup. Future investigations in OMPC should consider incorporating EBRT in their standard treatment approach.

Clinical and Urodynamic Predictors for Failure of Medical Management with Alpha Blockers in PBNO: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and urodynamic variables that may predict the failure of alpha-blockers in primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO) patients. Alpha-blockers are useful as a treatment option in patients with PBNO. Nonresponders need to undergo bladder neck incision (BNI). Little is known about the predictive factors determining the success of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study, spanning over a period of 8 years. PBNO was diagnosed in the presence of a bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) >40 with video-urodynamic evidence of obstruction at the bladder neck. The patients were initially managed with alpha-blockers (alfuzosin and tamsulosin) for 3-6 months, and BNI contemplated when pharmacotherapy failed. The patients with upper tract changes managed with upfront BNI or clean intermittent catheterization were excluded. The data for the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, urodynamic studies, and ultrasonography of pre and post-treatment periods were reviewed. Treatment outcomes were defined as complete response (>50% improvement in Qmax and IPSS score) and partial response (30%-50% improvement in Qmax and IPSS score) at 3 or 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were analyzed. 21 patients underwent BNI for the failure of medical management and 31 for recurrence of symptoms at a mean follow-up of 18.8 ± 3.5 months (12-70 months). Independent predictors of failure of pharmacotherapy with alpha-blockers were age (P = .021), Pdet@Qmax (P = .015), and BOOI (P = .019). CONCLUSION: Alpha-blockers are more likely to fail in PBNO in younger patients generating higher voiding pressures and BOOI > 60.

Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair by Transvaginal Route: Comparison of Resource Utilisation and Outcome with Literature Reported Population Matched Cohort of Patients Operated by Minimally Invasive Route.

Introduction and Objectives: VVF is conventionally repaired by open transvaginal or transabdominal routes. In last few decades, minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic/robotic) for VVF repair have gained popularity. We have reported our experience of transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair and compared it with the literature reported population matched cohort of VVF repair done by laparoscopic or robot-assisted techniques. Material and Methods: Intraoperative and post-operative parameters including aetiology of fistula, location, operative time, blood loss, major complications, hospital stay and success rate of 202 patients with simple VVF undergoing transvaginal repair at a tertiary care hospital from 1999 to 2019 were recorded. We also compared our transvaginal repair cohort (n = 202) with the literature reported cohort of 260 patients undergoing VVF repair by minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robot assisted) techniques in the systematic review by Miklos et al. Results: Most common aetiology of VVF in our series was post hysterectomy in 122 (60.39%) cases followed by trauma during emergency caesareans section in 80 (39.60%) cases. Transvaginal route had higher success rate than minimally invasive approach (99.50 vs. 96.50%, respectively). Mean operative time was lesser in transvaginal group than the minimally invasive group (63 ± 16 min vs. 161.56 ± 41.02 min, p < 0.01) with shorter mean hospital stay in transvaginal group (3 ± 1 days vs. 3.5 ± 1.16 days, respectively, p < 0.01). Mean estimated blood loss was significantly lesser in transvaginal repair (p < 0.01). 62% patients were sexually active at last follow-up. The cost of transvaginal VVF repair is significantly lower compared to repair by minimally invasive approach. Conclusion: Transvaginal VVF repair is comparable to minimally invasive approach in terms of post-operative outcomes and morbidity; however, transvaginal repair performs better in terms of cost and resource utilization.

A prospective randomized study to define the role of low dose continuous prophylactic antibiotics and anti-adherence agents in altering the microbial colonization related to indwelling double-J stents.

OBJECTIVE: Despite conflicting evidence, it is common practice to use continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) in patients with indwelling double-J (DJ) stents. Cranberry extracts and d-mannose have been shown to prevent colonization of the urinary tract. We evaluated their role in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate patients with indwelling DJ stents following urological procedures. They were randomized into three groups. Group A (n=46) received CAP (nitrofurantoin 100 mg once daily [OD]). Group B (n=48) received cranberry extract 300 mg and d-mannose 600 mg twice daily (BD). Group C (n=40) received no prophylaxis. The stents were removed between 15 days and 45 days after surgery. Three groups were compared in terms of colonization of stent and urine, stent related symptoms and febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) during the period of indwelling stent and until 1 week after removal. RESULTS: In Group A, 9 (19.5%) patients had significant bacterial growth on the stents. This was 8 (16.7%) in the Group B and 5 (12.5%) in Group C (p-value: 0.743). However, the culture positivity rate of urine specimens showed a significant difference (p-value: 0.023) with Group B showing least colonization of urine compared to groups A and C. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of stent related symptoms (p-value: 0.242) or febrile UTIs (p-value: 0.399) among the groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic agents have no role in altering bacterial growth on temporary indwelling DJ stent, stent related symptoms or febrile UTIs. Cranberry extract may reduce the colonization of urinary tract, but its clinical significance needs further evaluation.

Permanent perineal urethrostomy for anterior urethral strictures: A critical appraisal of long-term outcomes and erectile function.

OBJECTIVE: In complex strictures, especially in elderly patients, perineal urethrostomy (PU) provide excellent voiding function. This study aimed at evaluating the long-term voiding and erectile function of PU as a permanent procedure for such strictures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients who underwent permanent PU at our institution from January 2000 to December 2018. All patients had complex urethral strictures. Patients with posterior urethral involvement were excluded. Patients were followed up at 3 months and then yearly. Failure was defined as the need for any additional procedures. They were also evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. Fisher's exact test and χ2 test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The median age at the time of surgery was 58±7.3 years. The mean stricture length was 6.5±2.1 cm. All the patients had a history of previous surgery, and the average number of procedures per patient was 2.4. The median follow-up period was 26 months. The most common early and late postoperative complications were bleeding and stenosis of the urethrostomy, respectively. A total of 129 (88.3%) patients had a successful surgery. The number of patients with no erectile dysfunction increased from 55.4% to 67.8% after PU. The mean IIEF-5 score improved from 20.07 to 21.31 after PU, but this did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.3558). CONCLUSION: Permanent PU is an acceptable option for complex long-segment anterior urethral strictures, especially in elderly patients, with an excellent long-term outcome. A majority of patients also maintain a satisfactory erectile function.