A Phase 2 Randomized Dose-Finding Study With Esmirtazapine in Patients With Primary Insomnia.

The antidepressant mirtazapine is an alternative to classical hypnotics, and this study investigated the efficacy and safety of esmirtazapine (Org 50081, the maleic acid salt of S-mirtazapine) in patients given a diagnosis of primary insomnia after acute (2-day) treatment. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with primary insomnia were randomized to receive placebo or 1.5-, 3.0-, or 4.5-mg esmirtazapine in a balanced 4-way crossover study; 2 sleep laboratory nights with polysomnography were separated by 5-day, single-blind placebo washout periods. Polysomnography-determined total sleep time (primary end point) and patient-reported total sleep time improved by at least 25 minutes with all 3 doses of esmirtazapine (P ≤ 0.001 vs placebo). Polysomnography-measured wake time after sleep onset (P ≤ 0.0001) and latency to persistent sleep also improved vs placebo (P ≤ 0.01, 3.0 and 4.5 mg). Patient-reported sleep quality improved with 3.0- and 4.5-mg esmirtazapine (P ≤ 0.01 and P ≤ 0.05, respectively, vs placebo). Morning alertness and contentment were not altered after esmirtazapine, and calmness increased with 4.5-mg esmirtazapine vs placebo. Evening questionnaires showed no difference in duration of daytime naps but reduced energy and ability to work/function after esmirtazapine treatment periods vs placebo (P < 0.05), although this effect was limited to the first night of each 2-night period. There were few adverse events, no serious adverse events, or clinically relevant treatment differences in vital signs, laboratory values, or electrocardiogram. Esmirtazapine doses of 1.5 to 4.5 mg/day significantly improved quantity and quality of sleep and were generally well tolerated, with no evidence of safety concerns or consistent pattern of residual effects.

Esmirtazapine in non-elderly adult patients with primary insomnia: efficacy and safety from a 2-week randomized outpatient trial.

BACKGROUND: Esmirtazapine (Org 50081), a high-affinity antagonist at 5-HT2A and H1 receptors, was assessed for its hypnotic efficacy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized study, non-elderly patients with primary insomnia (but otherwise healthy) were treated with esmirtazapine (1.5, 3.0, or 4.5 mg) or placebo for two weeks. The primary end point was patient-reported total sleep time (TST); other patient-reported end points included sleep latency (SL), wake time after sleep onset (WASO), number of awakenings, sleep quality, and satisfaction with sleep duration. Measures to assess the potential adverse effects of treatment included morning alertness, daytime function/napping, and rebound insomnia during a single-blind placebo run-out week after treatment ended. Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 526 patients were randomized and 463 (88%) completed treatment. All esmirtazapine doses significantly improved TST, SL, sleep quality, and satisfaction with sleep duration versus placebo. Relative to placebo, TST was increased by 30-40 min and SL decreased by ~12 min for all doses. The highest dose (4.5 mg) also significantly reduced WASO and number of awakenings. Across doses, AEs occurred in 25.5-32.8% of patients, compared with 20.7% with placebo. The most common AE was somnolence (~10% for esmirtazapine and 2% for placebo). The incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation was low (≤7%), and there were no serious drug-related AEs. Finally, there was no evidence of a rebound insomnia after discontinuation of esmirtazapine. CONCLUSIONS: Two weeks of treatment with esmirtazapine consistently and significantly improved patient-reported sleep parameters, and it was well tolerated in patients with primary insomnia.

Esmirtazapine in non-elderly adult patients with primary insomnia: efficacy and safety from a randomized, 6-week sleep laboratory trial.

OBJECTIVE: Esmirtazapine (Org 50081), a medication that binds with high affinity to serotonin 5-HT2A and histamine-1 receptors, was evaluated as a potential treatment for insomnia. METHODS: Adults with primary insomnia were treated with esmirtazapine (3.0 or 4.5 mg) or placebo in this 6-week, double-blind, randomized, polysomnography (PSG) study. The end points included wake time after sleep onset (WASO) (primary), latency to persistent sleep, and total sleep time. Patient-reported parameters were also evaluated, including sleep quality and satisfaction with sleep duration. Residual daytime effects and rebound insomnia (sleep parameters during the single-blind placebo run-out week after treatment ended) were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 419 patients were randomized and 366 (87%) completed treatment. The median decrease in PSG WASO (double-blind average) was 20.5 min for placebo, and 52.0 min and 53.6 min for the 3.0- and 4.5-mg esmirtazapine groups, respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo for both doses). Changes in the other PSG parameters and in all patient-reported parameters were also statistically significant with both doses versus placebo. Overall, 35-42% of esmirtazapine-treated patients had adverse events (AEs) versus 29% in the placebo group. AEs were mild or moderate in most esmirtazapine-treated patients. Furthermore, the incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation was low (<8%). CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of treatment with esmirtazapine was associated with consistent improvements in objective and patient-reported parameters of sleep onset, maintenance, and duration. It was generally well tolerated, and residual daytime effects were minimal and no rebound insomnia was observed.

Efficacy and safety of the glycine transporter-1 inhibitor org 25935 for the prevention of relapse in alcohol-dependent patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Org 25935 is a glycine transporter inhibitor that increases extracellular glycine levels and attenuates alcohol-induced dopaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens. In animal models, Org 25935 has dose-dependent effects on ethanol intake, preference, and relapse-like behavior without tolerance. The current study aimed to translate these animal findings to humans by examining whether Org 25935 prevents relapse in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adult patients diagnosed with alcohol dependence were randomly assigned to receive Org 25935 12 mg twice a day or placebo for 84 days. The primary end point was percentage heavy drinking days (defined as ≥ 5 standard drinks per day for men and ≥ 4 for women). Secondary end points included other measures of relapse-related drinking behavior (e.g., drinks per day, time to relapse), as well as measures of global functioning, alcohol-related thoughts and cravings, and motivation. RESULTS: A total of 140 subjects were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The trial was stopped approximately midway after a futility analysis showing that the likelihood of detecting a signal at study term was <40%. There was no significant difference between Org 25935 and placebo on percentage heavy drinking days or any other measure of relapse-related drinking behavior. Org 25935 showed no safety issues and was fairly well tolerated, with fatigue, dizziness, and transient visual events as the most commonly occurring side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Org 25935 demonstrated no benefit over placebo in preventing alcohol relapse. Study limitations and implications are discussed.

Relapse prevention with gepirone ER in outpatients with major depression.

To evaluate long-term efficacy and tolerability of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist, gepirone extended release (ER), a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled relapse prevention study was performed in patients with recurrent major depression (DSM-IV criteria). Patients 18 to 70 years, with a primary diagnosis of recurrent major depression (DSM-IV; 296.3) and a screening and baseline HAMD-17 total score >/=20 were eligible. After a 3- to 14-day (dependent on pretrial medication) single-blind placebo washout period, eligible patients entered an 8- or 12-week (depending on time to remission) open-label gepirone ER treatment period. They initially received a dose of 20 mg/d gepirone ER and were titrated to a dose of 40 to 80 mg/d. Patients who achieved remission (HAMD-17 total score /=16 or discontinuation for lack of efficacy. A total of 420 patients were treated in the open-label phase. Of these, 303 (72.1%) completed the open-label phase and 250 (59.5%) fulfilled the criteria for remission and were randomized into the double-blind continuation phase (gepirone ER: n = 126; placebo: n = 124). The mean (+/-SD) final titrated dose of gepirone ER was 61.9 (+/-17.0) mg/d in the double-blind continuation phase. The relapse rate in the gepirone ER group was statistically significantly lower than that in the placebo group, 23.0% versus 34.7%, respectively (P = 0.024). During the open-label phase, adverse events that occurred in more than 5% of patients were nausea (15.7%), dizziness (13.1%), headache (12.9%), insomnia (6.2%), and vertigo (6.0%). During the continuation phase, the incidence of newly or re-emerging adverse events was similar with gepirone ER (43.7%) and placebo (42.7%). Adverse events different from those occurring during the open-label phase were not apparent. All adverse events occurred in less than 5% of patients with the exception of flu syndrome and headache. In conclusion, gepirone ER at a dose range of 40 to 80 mg/d is effective for relapse prevention in patients with recurrent major depression. It is well tolerated during long-term treatment for up to approximately one year.

A double-blind, randomized, group-comparative study of the tolerability and efficacy of 6 weeks' treatment with mirtazapine or fluoxetine in depressed Chinese patients.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and fluoxetine treatment in a sample population consisting of Chinese patients suffering moderate-to-severe depression. METHOD: 133 patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode (DSM-IV) and scoring 15 or more on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of treatment with either mirtazapine (15-45 mg/day) or fluoxetine (20-40 mg/day). Efficacy was assessed using the HAM-D and Clinical Global Impressions scale, with analyses performed on the intent-to-treat sample using the last-observation-carried-forward method. Safety analysis was based on the all-subjects-treated group. RESULTS: Mean daily doses were 34.1 mg for mirtazapine (N = 66) and 30.7 mg for fluoxetine (N = 66). Thirty patients in the mirtazapine group and 22 in the fluoxetine group dropped out. Both drugs proved equally effective for reduction of the overall symptoms of depression throughout the treatment period. At day 42, the mean reductions in HAM-D total score (compared with baseline) were 11.8 and 10.6 for the mirtazapine and fluoxetine groups, respectively; however, the changes were not statistically significant. Both treatments were well tolerated, with more nausea and influenza-like symptoms observed for the fluoxetine group, and greater weight increase and somnolence for the mirtazapine analog. CONCLUSION: Both mirtazapine and fluoxetine were indistinguishable in effectiveness for treatment of depressive symptoms, and both were well tolerated by our population of depressed Chinese patients. In line with analogous Western reports, the safety of mirtazapine and fluoxetine was comparable for our depressed Chinese patients; however, slightly different side effect profiles were noted for the 2 drugs in our study.