Limb Salvage and Survival in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: The Need for a Fast-Track Team-Based Approach.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the end-stage form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with a very poor prognosis and high risk of limb loss and mortality. It can be considered very similar to a terminal cancer disease, reflecting a large impact on quality of life and healthcare costs. The aim of this study is to offer an overview of the relationship between CLTI, limb salvage, and mortality, with a focus on the need of a fast-track team-based management that is a driver to achieve better survival results. This review can be useful to improve management of this growing impact disease, and to promote the standardisation of care and communication between specialist and non-specialist healthcare professionals.

Carotid artery stenting renaissance: is it safe and effective using new materials?

Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated significant differences between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in terms of early neurological outcomes (from 0 to 30 days), although mid- and long-term neurological results are indistinguishable. CAS in symptomatic standard risk patients is coupled with a higher risk of any stroke, and death or any stroke at 30 days, while the rates of disabling or major stroke do not vary remarkably between treatments. Since the micro-embolization through the stent struts is the primary suspected cause of suspected early postoperative neurological complications (i.e., non-disabling stroke), surgical technology has focused on the production of a new generation of stents with a double layer of mesh to reduce the "free area" of the cells, and on new cerebral protection devices. Another major determinant of early negative outcomes is believed to be the intraluminal manipulation occurring during carotid engagement from the aortic arch, the crossing maneuvers at the level of the culprit lesion and vessel trauma during angioplasty. To address these subject matters, new embolic protection devices and innovative strategies have been developed, consequently. This review is designed to furnish the current status of CAS results, to update the ongoing RCTs comparing CAS vs. CEA outcomes, and to recapitulate the features and clinical outcomes for a new carotid stent design, the so called "mesh-stents", and new embolic protection tools.

The use of cilostazol in patients with peripheral arterial disease: results of a national physician survey.

BACKGROUND: Although international guidelines recommend cilostazol as first-line therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) because it improves the symptoms and quality of life, it remains an underused agent for amputation-free survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate the practice among Italian physicians of the use of cilostazol in patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: For the present study, a cross-sectional survey was carried out. Physicians specialized in the medical and/or surgical treatment of PAD and who prescribe cilostazol regularly were invited to a phone interview. A nationally-representative probability sample of hospital-based physicians who diagnose and treat patients with PAD was randomly selected among the members of the Italian Physicians' Association. RESULTS: Out of a total of 641 physicians contacted, 250 of them (39%) accepted to take part in this survey. Reasons of survey refusal were the non-attitude to prescribe cilostazol (45%), or unspecified motivations (16%). Among the 250 physicians participating the survey: 120 were vascular surgeons, 80 internal medicine doctors, 50 angiologists. Cilostazol was suggested in 79% of patients with symptomatic intermittent claudication, and in 30% of patients who had undergone revascularization. The majority of physicians stated to prescribe cilostazol at recommended dosage of 100 mg bid (46.4%). The principal reason to suggest a reduced drug dosage was to limit early side effect at the time of treatment onset, but the increase to the full dose of cilostazol is suggested by 91.3% of interviewed within 4 weeks. Sixty-three percent of physicians affirmed to prescribe cilostazol as a continuous treatment for a mean of 4 months, while a lifelong treatment was suggested by 17.6% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Among physicians who habitually prescribe cilostazol adherence to the recommended drug dosage and length of treatment is high. The prescription of cilostazol is particularly appreciated in patients with symptomatic intermittent claudication, even before any non-invasive diagnosis of PAD, and before any invasive therapy. Finally a relevant number of physicians regularly prescribe cilostazol also after revascularization, advocating the anti-restenotic properties of the drug.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become a milestone in the treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Technological improvement allows treatment in more and more complex cases. This review summarizes all grafts available on the market. A complete review of most important trial on this topic is provided to the best of our knowledge, and technical tips and tricks for standard cases are also included.