Oral anticoagulants: Interventional pharmaceutical study with reminder of good practices, and iatrogenic impact.

OBJECTIVES: Study of the impact of geriatricians' training on the improvement of their prescribing practices, and comparison of iatrogenesis between the two classes of oral anticoagulants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Before/after and here/there comparison between a trained prescribers group and a control group, before and after the pharmacist intervention, with comparison of the iatrogenesis of two oral anticoagulant classes. Patients in the acute and post-acute geriatric departments treated with a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant were included. Criteria for Good practice were rated according to a scale of severity: calculation of a score and a percentage of compliance per patient, and then an average of the percentage of compliance (main criterion) within the populations to be compared. The proportion of iatrogenic elements between the two classes was compared. We used statistical tests (significance threshold of 5%). RESULTS: Vitamin K antagonist: a decreasing trend in the control group (P=0.086) and an increasing trend in the trained group (P=0.183) was observed in prescription compliance before/after training. Direct oral anticoagulants: the compliance before/after decreased in the control group (P=0.005) and increased in the trained group (P=0.024). After training, compliance is higher among the group of trained prescribers for both vitamin K antagonist (P=0.018) and direct oral anticoagulant (P=0.003). The proportion of iatrogenic events in the two oral anticoagulants classes was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Interest of good practice reminders in the quality of oral anticoagulants prescriptions with no difference in safety of use between the two classes.

Access to Care in France for Elderly Immigrants from North Africa: Influence of Socio-cultural Factors (the MATC Survey).

France is faced with an ageing migrant population, and in the institutions for elderly, migrants represent only 4% and very few come from the Maghreb. Is it the result of a kind of discrimination or of other factors such as culture and traditions? In France migrants have access to aid and prevention of dependency plans. The reluctance to enter into institutions is maintained by the fear of cultural abuse and/or language barriers, and difficulties in financial and administrative matters. From the interviews of the MATC survey, we have pointed out the importance of culture and the tradition of filial piety. Nevertheless, solidarity in the family is decreasing but remains the basis of the care support to the elderly. The will to keep them in the family may limit both the diagnosis and the access to specific care. This attitude contributes to a kind of self-discrimination.