Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender was developed to illuminate potential sex and gender differences in drug therapy and, therefore, achieve a better patient safety. The database contains non-commercial evidence-based information on drug substances regarding sex and gender aspects in patient treatment. Here, we describe our experiences and reflections from collecting, analyzing, and evaluating the evidence. JANUSMED SEX AND GENDER: Substances have been systematically reviewed and classified in a standardized manner. The classification considers clinically relevant sex and gender differences based on available evidence. Mainly biological sex differences are assessed except for gender differences regarding adverse effects and compliance. Of the 400 substances included in the database, clinically relevant sex differences were found for 20%. Sex-divided data were missing for 22% and no clinically relevant differences were found for more than half of the substances (52%). We noted that pivotal clinical studies often lack sex analyses of efficacy and adverse effects, and post-hoc analyzes are performed instead. Furthermore, most pharmacokinetic analyses use weight correction, but medicines are often prescribed in standard doses. In addition, few studies have sex differences as a primary outcome and some pharmacokinetic analyses are unpublished, which may complicate the classification of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our work underlines the need of sex and gender analyses, and sex-divided data in drug treatment, to increase the knowledge about these aspects in drug treatment and contribute to a more individualized patient treatment.

Risk factors for severe bleeding events during warfarin treatment: the influence of sex, age, comorbidity and co-medication.

PURPOSE: To investigate risk factors for severe bleeding during warfarin treatment, including the influence of sex, age, comorbidity and co-medication on bleeding risk. METHODS: Patients initiating warfarin treatment between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the nationwide Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, and diagnoses of severe bleeding were retrieved from the National Patient Register. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for severe bleeding were estimated using multiple Cox regression adjusting for indications and including covariates age, sex, comorbidities and co-medications. Interactions between sex and other covariates were investigated. RESULTS: The study cohort included 232,624 patients ≥ 18 years (101,011 women and 131,613 men). The incidence rate of severe bleeding was 37 per 1000 person-years, lower among women than men with an adjusted HR (95% CI) of 0.84 (0.80-0.88). Incidence of bleeding increased with age, HR 2.88 (2.37-3.50) comparing age ≥ 80 to < 40 years, and comorbidities associated with the highest risk of severe bleeding were prior bleeding, HR 1.85 (1.74-1.97); renal failure, HR 1.82 (1.66-2.00); and alcohol dependency diagnosis, HR 1.79 (1.57-2.05). Other comorbidities significantly associated with bleeding events were hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, liver failure, stroke/TIA, COPD and cancer. CONCLUSION: Most of the well-established risk factors were found to be significantly associated with bleeding events in our study. We additionally found that women had a lower incidence of bleeding. Potential biases are selection effects, residual confounding and unmeasured frailty.

Sex differences in spontaneous reports on adverse drug events for common antihypertensive drugs.

PURPOSE: To explore sex differences in spontaneously reported adverse drug events (ADEs) for antihypertensives in routine care. METHODS: A cross sectional analysis combining number of reports from the national pharmacovigilance database with data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, from 2005 to 2012 for ACE inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), with or without thiazide, diuretics (thiazides, potassium-sparing agents, sulfonamides, aldosterone antagonists), selective betablockers, and dihydropyridine calcium-channel-blockers (DHPs). The total number of reports was adjusted to exposed patients and dispensed DDDs among women and men. Dose exposures, co-medications, and co-prescriptions were also analyzed. RESULTS: In women, a higher prevalence of ADE-reports was seen in ACE-I (odds ratio, OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.09-1.35), ACE-I-combinations (OR 1.61; 1.44-1.79), ARB-combinations (OR 2.12; 1.47-3.06), thiazides (OR 1.78; 1.33-2.39), diuretics and potassium-sparing agents (OR 1.62; 1.22-2.17), and DHPs (OR 1.40; 1.17-1.67), with a potential linkage to dose exposure. For aldosterone antagonists, we observed a higher prevalence of ADE reports in men (OR 0.75; 0.59-0.97) but without any sex difference in dose exposure. CONCLUSIONS: This ecological study of reported ADEs showed a higher prevalence of reports in women in six out of ten groups of antihypertensive drugs, and this may potentially be linked to dose exposure. Aldosterone antagonists was the only group with a higher prevalence of ADE-reports in men with a similar dose exposure between women and men.

Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Emergency Medicine Ward - Prevalence, Preventability and Reporting.

PURPOSE: To identify the prevalence and preventability of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in an emergency ward setting in a tertiary hospital in Sweden and to what extent the detected ADRs were reported to the Medical Product Agency (MPA). METHODS: In this prospective cross sectional observational study, 706 patients admitted to one of the Emergency Wards, at the Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Stockholm during September 2008 -September 2009, were included. The electronic patient records were reviewed for patients' demographic parameters, prevalence of possible ADRs and assessment of their preventability. In addition, the extent of formal and required ADR reporting to national registers was studied. RESULTS: Approximately 40 percent of the patient population had at least one possible ADR (n = 284). In the multivariable regression model, age and number of drugs were significantly associated with risk of presenting with an ADR (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Sex was not identified as a significant predictor of ADRs (p = 0.27). The most common ADRs were cardiovascular, followed by electrolyte disturbances, and hemorrhage. In 18 percent of the patient population ADRs were the reason for admission or had contributed to admission and 24% of these ADRs were assessed as preventable. The under-reporting of ADRs to the MPA was 99%. CONCLUSIONS: ADRs are common in Emergency Medicine in tertiary care in Sweden, but under-reporting of ADRs is substantial. The most frequent ADRs are caused by cardiovascular drugs, and significantly associated with age and number of drugs. However, only a minority of the detected serious ADRs contributing to admission could have been avoided by increased risk awareness.

Sex differences in spontaneous reports on adverse bleeding events of antithrombotic treatment.

PURPOSE: To explore if sex differences are found in spontaneously reported adverse events for clopidogrel, low-dose aspirin and warfarin treatment in routine care. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis combining data on bleeding events from the Swedish Spontaneous Adverse Drug Event Reporting System (SWEDIS) with data from the National Prescribed Drug register. Bleeding event reports from 1999 to 2010 and 2005 to 2010 were adjusted to the number of prescriptions and the number of exposed patients respectively among women and men. Co-medication and co-prescription were analysed. RESULTS: More men were dispensed clopidogrel although the reported bleeding event risk after adjustment for number of patients exposed was higher in women (RR 1.40; 95 % CI, 1.00-1.96). The difference disappeared when adjusting for the number of prescriptions (RR 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.71-1.39). The reported bleeding event risk with low-dose aspirin was lower in women, adjusted for patients exposed (RR 0.80; 95 % CI, 0.66-0.97). For warfarin, no sex difference in bleeding event reports could be found (RR 1.01; 95 % CI, 0.87-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: This ecological comparison of bleeding reports and dispensed prescriptions showed a signal towards a higher prevalence of bleeding reports in women on clopidogrel treatment while the opposite was found for low-dose aspirin. For warfarin, no significant sex difference was seen regarding bleeding event reports, suggesting individualised dosing being an important factor. Men were more commonly prescribed antithrombotic combinations, and this was reflected by a larger proportion of bleeding reports including more than one antithrombotic agent.