Assessing outcomes of curricular change: a view from program graduates.

Graduates of dental programs constitute a stakeholder group that is able to provide unique information concerning the effectiveness of the dental curriculum in preparing them for dental careers. Following the implementation of planned curricular changes, graduates of the former and the new curricula were surveyed. Results indicate that, while both groups perceive themselves to have been adequately prepared by their D.D.S. program for practice, graduates of the new curriculum indicated a higher level of preparedness in several areas, especially regarding selecting, prescribing and administering pharmacotherapeutic agents. In addition, the results suggest that the change in the first two years from an emphasis on basic sciences and preclinical laboratory work to an early introduction to live dental patients and the integration of foundation sciences and clinical courses were endorsed. The evidence gathered from this alumni survey indicates that the reforms implemented in the dental curriculum were appropriate. Areas requiring further investigation are also discussed.

Employing oral examinations (viva voce) in assessing dental students' clinical reasoning skills.

The development and evaluation of a comprehensive oral examination system are described. These examinations are designed to measure, in an authentic manner, graduating students' understanding and use of the clinical reasoning and professional communications skills employed in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of realistic clinical situations. The examination cases were developed from actual clinic cases, enhanced to fit the requirements of the examination. Faculty members were provided with training sessions designed to promote consistency of administration and scoring. A mock oral examination was held to acquaint students with the process and to help reduce their anxiety. The results suggest that the oral examination is a reasonably valid and reliable approach to assessing clinical reasoning skills and that graduating students demonstrated competency in the areas tested.