Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Dental Implant Abutments: Comparative Analysis and Surface Characterization.

Metals subjected to the oral environment are prone to corrosion over time and this can be harmful. Metallic restoration components such as dental subgingival implant abutments are exposed to pH changes and different ions while in contact with saliva. The aim of the study was to evaluate the corrosion resistance of titanium dental implant abutments and to compare and contrast the surface characteristics of these alloys before and after corrosion. The corrosion examination (Ecorr, jcorr, OCP, polarization curve) of two implant abutments (TiDesign EV, Astra Tech, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Individual Titanium Abutment, Apollo Implants Components, Pabianice, Poland) was performed in 0.9% NaCl and 5% HCl. Moreover, specimens were investigated using SEM-EDS before and after the corrosion test. The value of jcorr in NaCl was higher for Astra (34.2 × 10-8 ± 2.5 × 10-8 A/cm2) than for Apollo (8.8 × 10-8 ± 2.5 × 10-8 A/cm2). Whereas, in HCl, the opposite relationship was observed (Astra 2.9 × 10-4 ± 0.8 × 10-4 A/cm2 and Apollo 62.7 × 10-4 ± 9.3 × 10-4 A/cm2). An average reactive anodic current density in NaCl for Astra amounted up to ~0.2 × 10-5-1.5 × 10-5 A/cm2, while for Apollo-up to ~3.3-9.7 × 10-7 A/cm2. The composition of both alloys after corrosion in NaCl demonstrated some changes: a decrease in the Ti, and Al and an increase in oxygen content. Hence, both alloys after corrosion in HCl demonstrated some minor changes in the elemental composition. Based on the results it can be concluded that: 1. Astra and Apollo abutments revealed good corrosion resistance and a passivation layer on the surface. 2. Apollo abutments exhibited better corrosion resistance in a neutral environment, suggesting that Astra abutments were found to be more resistant to corrosion in an acidic medium.

Does Simulated Porcelain Firing Influence Corrosion Properties of Casted and Sintered CoCr Alloys?

The aim of the study was to evaluate how heat processing used for dental porcelain firing influences the surface properties of sintered and casted CoCr alloy. Two CoCr alloys, Soft Metal LHK (milling in soft material and sintering) and MoguCera C (casting), were used for the study. The samples were examined using SEM-EDS before and after heat treatment. Next, corrosion examinations (Ecorr, jcorr, polarization curve, Ebr) were performed. Finally, the samples were evaluated under SEM. Based on the results, the following conclusions might be drawn: 1. Thermal treatment (porcelain firing) did not cause chemical impurities formation on the surface of CoCr alloy; 2. The sintered metal exhibited significantly higher corrosion resistance than the casted one due to its homogeneity of structure and chemical composition; 3. Heat treatment (porcelain firing) decreased the resistance of casted and sintered CoCr alloy to electrochemical corrosion. The reduction in corrosion resistance was significantly higher for the casted alloy than for the sintered alloy; 4. The corrosion resistance decrease might be due to an increased thickness and heterogeneity of oxide layers on the surface (especially for the casted alloy). The development of corrosion process started in the low-density areas of the oxide layers; 5. The sintered metal seems to be a favourable framework material for porcelain fused to metal crowns.

Chemical passivation as a method of improving the electrochemical corrosion resistance of Co-Cr-based dental alloy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate corrosion resistance of Wirobond C® alloy after chemical passivation treatment. METHODS: The alloy surface undergone chemical passivation treatment in four different media. Corrosion studies were carried out by means of electrochemical methods in saline solution. Corrosion effects were determined using SEM. RESULTS: The greatest increase in the alloy polarization resistance was observed for passive layer produced in Na2SO4 solution with graphite. The same layer caused the highest increase in corrosion current. Generally speaking, the alloy passivation in Na2SO4 solution with graphite caused a substantial improvement of the corrosion resistance. The sample after passivation in Na2SO4 solution without graphite, contrary to others, lost its protective properties along with successive anodic polarization cycles. The alloy passivation in Na3PO4 solution with graphite was the only one that caused a decrease in the alloy corrosion properties. The SEM studies of all samples after chemical passivation revealed no pit corrosion - in contrast to the sample without any modification. CONCLUSIONS: Every successive polarization cycle in anodic direction of pure Wirobond C® alloy enhances corrosion resistance shifting corrosion potential in the positive direction and decreasing corrosion current value. The chemical passivation in solutions with low pH values decreases susceptibility to electrochemical corrosion of Co-Cr dental alloy. The best protection against corrosion was obtained after chemical passivation of Wirobond C® in Na2SO4 solution with graphite. Passivation with Na2SO4 in solution of high pH does not cause an increase in corrosion resistance of WIROBOND C. Passivation process increases alloy resistance to pit corrosion.

The effect of heat treatment simulating porcelain firing processes on titanium corrosion resistance.

PURPOSE: Corrosion resistance of titanium used in metal-ceramic restorations in manufacturing is based on the presence of oxide layer on the metal surface. The procedures used during combining metallic material with porcelain may affect the changes in oxide layers structure, and thus anticorrosive properties of metallic material. The aim of the study was an evaluation of potential changes in the structure and selected corrosion properties of titanium after sandblasting and thermal treatment applicable to the processes of ceramics fusion. METHODS: Milled titanium elements were subjected to a few variants of the processes typical of ceramics fusion and studied in terms of resistance to electrochemical corrosion. The study included the OCP changes over time, measurements of Icorr, Ecorr and Rp as well as potentiodynamic examinations. Surface microstructure and chemical composition were analyzed using SEM and EDS methods. RESULTS: The results obtained allow us to conclude that the processes corresponding to ceramic oxidation and fusion on titanium in the variants used in the study do not cause deterioration of its anticorrosive properties, and partially enhance the resistance. This depends on the quality of oxide layers structure. CONCLUSIONS: Titanium elements treated by porcelain firing processes do not lose their corrosion resistance.