Results of a survey about specific inflammatory bowel disease units in Andalusia.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has become one of the most prevalent pathologies in Gastroenterology Units, which added to its clinical outcome, treatment, the complexity of affected patients and the need to be continuously updated for the correct management of the disease, have made essential the presence of specific IBD units in each hospital. OBJECTIVES: The primary aims of this study were: a) to reveal the existence of these units in our area and how they work; and b) to draw conclusions regarding the necessary resources in these units and their aims. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to analyse the presence of these specialized units and the available resources in Andalusian hospitals, a 24-question survey was designed, being answered by 11 hospitals. The evaluated questions included the number of days patients are attended and the number of physicians attending the unit, the number of available healthcare assistants, if emergencies are attended or not, if there is an activated telephone number for patient consultation, if a day care unit is available and if new treatments are easily accessible. RESULTS: A specific IBD unit is present in all studied hospitals attending more than 11 patients each, although in the 63.4% of the cases patients are not attended more than 3 days per week. On the other hand, the 81.8% of the included hospitals attend emergencies although only the 54.5% of them had a specific telephone number for patient attendance. CONCLUSIONS: A specific IBD unit is present in many Andalusian hospitals, although some deficiencies can be observed. The general opinion of this Group is that these units are necessary in order to properly attend, monitorize and treat patients affected by IBD.

[A high-resolution gastroenterology clinic in Andalusia: what is it, and how should it work]. / Consulta de alta resolución de digestivo en Andalucía: qué es y cómo debe funcionar?

INTRODUCTION: The present concept in our healthcare system is that medical care should be given on an outpatient basis with hospitalization occurring only when essential. We therefore put forth the development of the "all in one" outpatient office or "high resolution" outpatient clinic. For such purpose we administered a questionnaire to various Andalusian hospitals to define and determine those aspects necessary in the development of the aforementioned outpatient office. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The questionnaire was filled out by 10 Andalusian hospitals. This is a prospective-descriptive study of responses from all 10 participating hospitals. The 27 questions inquired on the existence of such an outpatient office and the infrastructure needed to develop this service: How many patients are seen, where is it physically located, where do patients come from, criteria for assigning patients to this medical office, condition of incoming patients, whether ultrasound scans are performed, whether an integrated hospital computer system exists, nursing staff, how many visits are required before coming to a diagnosis, and finally whether this type of outpatient office is needed, and if so, why. RESULTS: Of all 10 hospitals, 5 of them had this type of clinic. All of them considered this type of outpatient service essential. The number of patients treated should be "10", in the hospital itself. There are differences as to whether patients should come from the emergency room or a primary care physician. It seems logical to assume that only patients who can be diagnosed via ultrasounds or endoscopy should be chosen. To allow an ultrasonogram the patient should visit the outpatient office in a state of "fasting" and with standard blood counts from the primary care physician. The outpatient clinic should have a computer system and its own nurse. According to participating hospitals this type of outpatient visits is very useful in our present healthcare system, as it allows higher levels of collaboration between Primary Care and the specialist; it also provides a rapid orientation regarding patient pathology, and acts as a "filter" for the rest of the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: The outpatient office should be tended to by an attending specialist in the field (FEA) with knowledge and experience in ultrasounds and gastrointestinal endoscopy, as well as user competency with the required computer programs. In our present-day system this can be considered a modality of high-resolution outpatient services and a model of efficiency.

Effect of injection sclerosis with alcohol on the rebleeding rate of gastroduodenal peptic ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels: a prospective, controlled trial.

To assess the efficacy of injection therapy with alcohol on prevent rebleeding and emergency surgery in patients with gastroduodenal ulcers and nonbleeding visible vessels, we have performed a prospective controlled trial involving 39 patients who were classified into two groups according to the time of the day on which emergency endoscopy was performed: group 1 (25 patients) in which endoscopic hemostasis with absolute alcohol was performed, and group 2 (14 patients) in which conventional therapy was applied (blood transfusions, antacids, and ranitidine). The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, and type of bleeding. The rebleeding rate/emergency surgery rate of 8%/4%, respectively, for group 1 was lower than the 57%/50% for group 2 (p less than 0.001). Our results suggest that endoscopic hemostasis with alcohol should be considered as the initial treatment of choice in patients who present with major upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and are found to have an ulcer with a nonbleeding visible vessel.