Manejo de la pandemia de COVID-19 en hospitalización domiciliaria en dos hospitales comarcales españoles: qué significó, quiénes atendimos, quién falleció y como evolucionó la asistencia a lo largo del tiempo / Management of COVID-19 pandemic in hospital at home in two regional Spanish hospitals. what it meant, who we cared for, who died and how assistance has evolved over time

Introducción. La Hospitalización a Domicilio (HAD) es una modalidad de ingreso alternativa que puede resultar de gran utilidad en momentos de estrés sanitario como la pandemia de COVID-19. En el presente trabajo se recoge el manejo de los pacientes ingresados con COVID-19 en HAD en dos hospitales comarcales españoles durante dos años.Métodos. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, observacional y retrospectivo de los pacientes ingresados en HAD con COVID-19. Posteriormente se realizó un análisis para caracterizar a los pacientes que fallecieron en HAD o a 30 días del alta y otro para comparar el manejo entre la primera fase del estudio (2020) y la segunda (2021 y parte de 2022).Resultados. Se reclutaron 167 pacientes. Un 52,1% se trasladaron para vigilar que continuaban mejorando frente a un 40,7% en los que se hizo para vigilar que no empeoraran. Los pacientes que fallecieron en HAD resultaron más ancianos (87,5 años de media), más comórbidos y con mayor probabilidad de ser no reanimables en caso de paro cardiaco (No RCP) (85%). En la segunda fase del estudio se ingresaron pacientes más ancianos, más comórbidos y en mayor grado No RCP que los ingresados en 2020.Conclusiones. La HAD es un recurso útil para aumentar la resiliencia de los sistemas sanitarios en casos de estrés como supuso la enfermedad por COVID-19. El desarrollo y crecimiento de las unidades ya existentes, así como la creación de otras nuevas allá donde no existan, puede ser una herramienta básica para la medicina del futuro (AU)

Introduction. Home Hospitalization (HH) is an alternative hospitalization modality that can be very useful in times of health stress such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper includes the management of patients admitted with COVID-19 in HH in two county spanish hospitals for two years.Methods. A descriptive, observational and retrospective study of all patients admitted at HH with a diagnosis of COVID-19 disease was carried out. Subsequently, further analysis was carried out to characterize the patients who died in HH or 30 days after discharge and another to compare the management between the first phase of the study (2020) and the second one (2021 and part of 2022).Results. A total of 167 patients were recruited. A 52.1% moved to watch that the recovery continued compared to 40.7% in which it was done to watch that they did not worsen. The patients who died in HAD were older (mean 87.5 years), more comorbid and more likely to have do-not resucitate orders (DNR) in case of cardiac arrest (85%). In the second phase of the study, older patients, more comorbid patients and with a greater degree of DNR orders were admitted than those admitted throughout 2020.Conclusions. HAD is a useful resource to increase the resilience of health systems in cases of stress such as the disease caused by COVID-19. The development and growth of existing units, as well as the creation of new ones where they do not exist, could be a basic tool for the medicine of the future (AU)

Woman with necrotising granulomatouslymphadenitis: the key was in anamnesis and physical examination

No disponible

Antimicrobial management in community acquired pneumonia in hospital at home: Is there room for improvement?

INTRODUCTION: Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is common disease that can be treated in Hospital At Home (HAH). In this paper we evaluate the room of improvement in the use of antibiotics in CAP in HH. METHODS: Patients with CAP were retrospectively recruited in two Spanish hospitals from 1/1/18 to 10/30/19. Demographic, clinical and quality of antibiotic prescription variables were recorded. Subsequently, we created a new variable that collected six quality of care indicator, categorizing and comparing patients into two groups: good quality of care (4 or more indicators performed) or poor quality of care (3 or less indicators performed). RESULTS: We recruited 260 patients. The request for diagnostic tests and the adequacy to Clinical Practice Guidelines were 85.4% and 85.8% respectively. Percentages of de-escalation (53.7%) and sequential therapy (57.7%) when indicated were low. The average length of treatment was 7.3 days for intravenous and 9.5 days for total. Quality of prescription was good in 134 (63.2%) patients, being more frequent in those who were admitted directly to HAD from the emergency room. It was also associated with less readmission at 30 days. CONCLUSION: There is a wide room for improvement in some fields of antimicrobials use in HAH that could stimulate the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.

Manejo antibiótico en neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en la hospitalización a domicilio: ¿Hay margen de mejora? / Antimicrobial management in community acquired pneumonia in hospital at home: Is there room for improvement?

Introducción: La neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) es una enfermedad frecuente que puede ser abordada en hospitalización a domicilio (HAD). En el presente trabajo evaluamos el margen de mejora con el uso de antibióticos en la NAC en HAD. Métodos: Se reclutaron retrospectivamente todos los pacientes con NAC en dos hospitales españoles desde el 01 de enero de 2018 al 30 de octubre de 2019. Se registraron variables demográficas, clínicas y sobre calidad de prescripción antibiótica. Posteriormente se construyó una variable que recogía seis indicadores de calidad asistencial, categorizando y comparando a los pacientes en dos grupos: buena calidad asistencial (cuatro o más indicadores realizados) o mala calidad asistencial (tres o menos indicadores realizados). Resultados: Obtuvimos una muestra de 260 pacientes. La solicitud de pruebas diagnósticas y la adecuación a las guías de práctica clínica fue del 85,4 y 85,8%, respectivamente. Los porcentajes de realización de desescalada (53,7%) y terapia secuencial (57,7%) cuando estaban indicadas fueron bajos. La duración media del tratamiento fue de 7,3 días para el intravenoso y 9,5 días para el total. La calidad de prescripción fue buena en 134 (63,2%) pacientes, siendo más frecuente en aquellos que ingresaron directamente en HAD desde urgencias. También se asoció a menor reingreso a 30 días. Conclusión: Existe un amplio margen de mejora en algunos aspectos con el uso de antimicrobianos en HAD, que podría motivar la implementación de programas de optimización del uso de antibióticos.(AU)

Introduction: Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is common disease that can be treated in Hospital At Home (HAH). In this paper we evaluate the room of improvement in the use of antibiotics in CAP in HH. Methods: Patients with CAP were retrospectively recruited in two Spanish hospitals from 1/1/18 to 10/30/19. Demographic, clinical and quality of antibiotic prescription variables were recorded. Subsequently, we created a new variable that collected six quality of care indicator, categorizing and comparing patients into two groups: good quality of care (4 or more indicators performed) or poor quality of care (3 or less indicators performed). Results: We recruited 260 patients. The request for diagnostic tests and the adequacy to Clinical Practice Guidelines were 85.4% and 85.8% respectively. Percentages of de-escalation (53.7%) and sequential therapy (57.7%) when indicated were low. The average length of treatment was 7.3 days for intravenous and 9.5 days for total. Quality of prescription was good in 134 (63.2%) patients, being more frequent in those who were admitted directly to HAD from the emergency room. It was also associated with less readmission at 30 days. Conclusion: There is a wide room for improvement in some fields of antimicrobials use in HAH that could stimulate the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. (AU)

Manejo de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en la hospitalización a domicilio: ¿Qué pacientes atendemos y cuál es su perfil de riesgo? / Management of Venous Trhomboembolic Disease in Home Hospitalization: Which Patients Do We Treat and What Is Their Risk Stratification?

Introducción: Las Guías de Práctica Clínica re-cogen el mejor manejo de la Enfermedad Trom-boembólica Venosa (ETEV) en función de la estratificación del riesgo en cuanto a ingreso o tratamiento ambulatoria. La utilidad de la Hos-pitalización a Domicilio (HAD) en esta enferme-dad es poco conocida. Métodos: Realizamos un estudio descriptivo y comparativo de todos los pacientes admitidos en HAD por ETEV durante dos años, empareján-dolos con otro grupo de pacientes de hospitali-zación convencional (HC). Analizamos también el destino de los pacientes (HAD o HC) en fun-ción de la estratificación del riesgo. Resultados: Obtuvimos una muestra de n=76 pacientes. La estancia hospitalaria fue menor en el grupo de HAD. No hubo diferencias esta-dísticamente significativas en el resto de varia-bles. El 22,9% de los pacientes con riesgo bajo de mortalidad ingresaron. Conclusión: La estratificación del riesgo o las características clínicas de los pacientes con ETEV no tuvieron relevancia frente a la elec-ción del destino en régimen de HAD, pudien-do haber primado más los criterios generales de ingreso en HAD (preferencias del paciente, soporte domiciliario adecuado, o el manejo de otras comorbilidades).(AU)

Introduction: Clincal Practice Guidelines show the best management of Venous Thromboem-bolic Disease (VTE) based on risk stratification in terms of admission or outpatient treatment. The utility of Home Hospitalization (HH) in this disease is poorly understood. Methods: We conducted a descriptive and com-parative study of all patients admitted at HH for VTE for two years, matching them with another group of conventional hospitalization (CH) pa-tients. We also analyzed the destination of the patients (HH or CH) based on their risk strati-fication. Results: We obtained a sample of n=76 pa-tients. The hospital length of stay was shorter in the HAD group. There were no statistically sig-nificant differences in the rest of the variables. 22.9% of patients with low risk of mortality were admitted at CH or HH. Conclusion: Risk stratification or clinical charac-teristics of patients with VTE were not relevant when it came to the choice of destination under the HH regimen. General criteria for admission to HH (patient preferences, adequate home support, or management other comorbidities) may have prevailed more in order to take that decision.(AU)

Neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en un hospital terciario español: ¿cómo se comporta en pacientes provenientes de residencia? / Community acquired pneumonia in a Spanish tertiary hospital: how does it work in patients from residence?

No disponible

Performance Assessment of Software to Detect and Assist Prescribers with Antimicrobial Drug Interactions: Are all of them Created Equal?

BACKGROUND: Detecting and managing antimicrobial drug interactions (ADIs) is one of the facets of prudent antimicrobial prescribing. Our aim is to compare the capability of several electronic drug-drug interaction (DDI) checkers to detect and report ADIs. METHODS: Six electronic DDI checking platforms were evaluated: Drugs.com®, Medscape®, Epocrates®, Medimecum®, iDoctus®, and Guía IF®. Lexicomp® Drug Interactions was selected as the gold standard. Ten ADIs addressing different mechanisms were evaluated with every electronic DDI checker. For each ADI, we assessed five dimensions and calculated an overall performance score (maximum possible score: 10 points). The explored dimensions were sensitivity (capability to detect ADI), clinical effect (type and severity), mechanism of interaction, recommended action(s), and documentation (quality of evidence and availability of references). RESULTS: The electronic DDI checkers did not detect a significant proportion of the ADI assessed. The overall performance score ranged between 4.4 (Medimecum) and 8.8 (Drugs.com). Drugs.com was the highest ranked platform in four out of five dimensions (sensitivity, effect, mechanism, and recommended action). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in the performance of the available platforms in detecting and assessing ADI. Although some ADI checkers have proven to be very accurate, others missed almost half of the explored interactions.

Young doctors' perspectives on antibiotic use and resistance: a multinational and inter-specialty cross-sectional European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) survey.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate training has the potential to shape the prescribing practices of young doctors. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the practices, attitudes and beliefs on antibiotic use and resistance in young doctors of different specialties. METHODS: We performed an international web-based exploratory survey. Principal component analysis (PCA) and bivariate and multivariate [analysis of variance (ANOVA)] analyses were used to investigate differences between young doctors according to their country of specialization, specialty, year of training and gender. RESULTS: Of the 2366 participants from France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain, 54.2% of young doctors prescribed antibiotics predominantly as instructed by a mentor. Associations between the variability of answers and the country of training were observed across most questions, followed by variability according to the specialty. Very few differences were associated with the year of training and gender. PCA revealed five dimensions of antibiotic prescribing culture: self-assessment of knowledge, consideration of side effects, perception of prescription patterns, consideration of patient sickness and perception of antibiotic resistance. Only the country of specialization (partial η2 0.010-0.111) and the type of specialization (0.013-0.032) had a significant effect on all five identified dimensions (P < 0.01). The strongest effects were observed on self-assessed knowledge and in the perception of antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The country of specialization followed by the type of specialization are the most important determinants of young doctors' perspectives on antibiotic use and resistance. The inclusion of competencies in antibiotic use in all specialty curricula and international harmonization of training should be considered.

La formación de grado en enfermedades infecciosas, resistencia y uso de antibióticos desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de Medicina / Perspective of Spanish medical students regarding undergraduate education in infectious diseases, bacterial resistance and antibiotic use

Introducción: Una de las principales herramientas para optimizar el uso de los antibióticos es la formación de los prescriptores. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer la opinión de los estudiantes de Medicina españoles sobre la formación en enfermedades infecciosas. Material y métodos: Se distribuyó un cuestionario on line anonimizado entre estudiantes de sexto curso a través de distintos canales. El cuestionario incluyó 45 preguntas sobre conocimientos, actitudes y percepciones sobre el diagnóstico, resistencia antimicrobiana, uso de antibióticos y la formación de pregrado en enfermedades infecciosas. Resultados: Se recibieron un total de 441 encuestas de 21 facultades. Se obtuvieron 374 respuestas (84,8%) de las 8 facultades más representadas, con una tasa de respuesta del 28,9%. La mayoría de los alumnos se sentían preparados para identificar los signos clínicos de infección (418; 94,8%) y para interpretar correctamente las pruebas de laboratorio (382; 86,6%). Reconocieron saber elegir un antibiótico con seguridad sin consultar libros ni guías (178; 40,4%). Solo 107 alumnos (24,3%) consideraron haber recibido suficiente formación en el uso prudente de los antimicrobianos. Respecto a los métodos de aprendizaje, se percibieron como más útiles la discusión de casos clínicos, los rotatorios en servicios o unidades de enfermedades infecciosas y los talleres de pequeños grupos: se evaluaron favorablemente en un 76,9; en un 76 y en un 68,8% de los casos, respectivamente. Conclusión: Los estudiantes de Medicina se encuentran más seguros en el diagnóstico de enfermedades infecciosas que en el tratamiento antibiótico. Asimismo, sienten la necesidad de recibir mayor formación en antibioterapia y uso prudente en antibióticos

Introduction: One of the main tools to optimize antibiotics use is education of prescribers. The aim of this article is to study undergraduate education in the field of infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic stewardship from the perspective of Spanish medical students. Material and methods: An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed among sixth grade students using different channels in Europe, within the ESGAP Student-Prepare survey. The questionnaire included 45 questions about knowledge, attitudes and perceptions about diagnosis, bacterial resistance, use of antibiotics and undergraduate training in infectious diseases. We present here the Spanish results. Results: A total of 441 surveys were received from 21 medical schools. A total of 374 responses (84.8%) were obtained from the 8 most represented faculties, with a response rate of 28.9%. Most students felt adequately prepared to identify clinical signs of infection (418; 94.8%) and to accurately interpret laboratory tests (382; 86.6%). A total of 178 (40.4%) acknowledged being able to choose an antibiotic with confidence without consulting books or guidelines. Only 107 (24.3%) students considered that they had received sufficient training in judicious use of antibiotics. Regarding learning methods, the discussion of clinical cases, infectious diseases units rotatories and small group workshops were considered the most useful, being evaluated favorably in 76.9%, 76% and 68.8% of the cases. Conclusion: Medical students feel more confident in the diagnosis of infectious diseases than in antibiotic treatment. They also feel the need to receive more training in antibiotics and judicious antibiotic use

Perspective of Spanish medical students regarding undergraduate education in infectious diseases, bacterial resistance and antibiotic use. / La formación de grado en enfermedades infecciosas, resistencia y uso de antibióticos desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de Medicina.

INTRODUCTION: One of the main tools to optimize antibiotics use is education of prescribers. The aim of this article is to study undergraduate education in the field of infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic stewardship from the perspective of Spanish medical students. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed among sixth grade students using different channels in Europe, within the ESGAP Student-Prepare survey. The questionnaire included 45 questions about knowledge, attitudes and perceptions about diagnosis, bacterial resistance, use of antibiotics and undergraduate training in infectious diseases. We present here the Spanish results. RESULTS: A total of 441 surveys were received from 21 medical schools. A total of 374 responses (84.8%) were obtained from the 8 most represented faculties, with a response rate of 28.9%. Most students felt adequately prepared to identify clinical signs of infection (418; 94.8%) and to accurately interpret laboratory tests (382; 86.6%). A total of 178 (40.4%) acknowledged being able to choose an antibiotic with confidence without consulting books or guidelines. Only 107 (24.3%) students considered that they had received sufficient training in judicious use of antibiotics. Regarding learning methods, the discussion of clinical cases, infectious diseases units rotatories and small group workshops were considered the most useful, being evaluated favorably in 76.9%, 76% and 68.8% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Medical students feel more confident in the diagnosis of infectious diseases than in antibiotic treatment. They also feel the need to receive more training in antibiotics and judicious antibiotic use.