Effect of three training programs on surgical performance in single-port laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three training methodologies on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), using straight and articulating instruments. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with subjects randomly divided into three groups, who performed a specific training for 12 days using three laparoscopic tasks in a laparoscopic simulator. Group-A trained in conventional laparoscopy setting using straight instruments and in LESS setting using both straight and articulating instruments. Group-B trained in LESS setting using straight and articulating instruments, whereas Group-C trained in LESS setting using articulating instruments. Participants' performance was recorded with a video-tracking system and evaluated with 12 motion analysis parameters (MAPs). RESULTS: All groups obtained significant differences in their performance in most of the MAPs. Group-C showed an improvement in nine MAPs, with a high level of technical competence. Group-A presented a marked improvement in bimanual dexterity skills. CONCLUSIONS: Training in LESS surgery using articulating laparoscopic instruments improves the quality of skills and allows smoother learning curves.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el efecto de tres métodos de entrenamiento en la adquisición de habilidades psicomotrices para la cirugía laparoendoscópica por puerto único (LESS, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery) utilizando instrumental recto y articulado. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo con sujetos divididos aleatoriamente en tres grupos, quienes realizaron un entrenamiento específico durante 12 días utilizando tres tareas laparoscópicas en un simulador laparoscópico. El grupo A entrenó en el entorno laparoscópico convencional con instrumentos rectos, y en el entorno LESS con instrumentos rectos y articulados. El grupo B entrenó en el entorno LESS con instrumentos rectos y articulados. El Grupo C entrenó en el entorno LESS con instrumentos articulados. El desempeño de los participantes se registró con un sistema de seguimiento en video y fue evaluado con 12 parámetros de análisis de movimiento (MAP, motion analysis parameters). RESULTADOS: Todos los grupos obtuvieron diferencias significativas en su desempeño para la mayoría de los MAP. El grupo C mostró una mejora en nueve MAP, con un alto nivel de competencia técnica. El grupo A mostró una marcada mejora en la habilidad de destreza bimanual. CONCLUSIONES: El entrenamiento en cirugía LESS con instrumentos articulados mejora la calidad de las habilidades adquiridas y permite curvas de aprendizaje más suaves.

Use of a new device for gasless endosurgery in a laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair ex vivo canine model: A pre-clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a new device for gasless laparoscopy in providing working space for diaphragmatic hernia repair in an ex vivo canine model as a pre-clinical study. STUDY DESIGN: Technical feasibility study. ANIMAL: Eight beagles and two greyhound cadavers (not client-owned). METHODS: The new device was used for abdominal traction in gasless laparoscopic reconstruction of diaphragmatic hernias produced in dog cadavers. It consists of three main parts (vertical and horizontal rods, a three-piece structure, and a 3D-printed unit that incorporates slots for haemostatic forceps). Composite hernias (two incisions of about 4 cm) were closed by an intra-corporeal suture [suture group (GS), n = 5] or by a central suture and a polypropylene mesh [mesh group (GM), n = 5]. Surgical steps were T1 (primary port access up to third port placement), T2 (defect development), and T3 (diaphragmatic reconstruction). Total surgical time (TT) was also recorded. RESULTS: The defect was successfully developed and reconstructed in all cadavers. To close the defect, 7.0 ± 0.7 crossed mattress sutures were required in the GS, and 15.2 ± 1.9 hernia staples and one intra-corporal suture were used in the GM. T3 was longer (p = 0.0076) in GS (50.00 ± 16.46 min) than in GM (23.24 ± 5.25 min). TT was 87.22 ± 19.23 min in GS and 66.45 ± 6.38 min in GM (p = 0.0547). CONCLUSIONS: Gasless laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair using the developed device is feasible in the canine cadaver model. Both suture and mesh graft techniques for experimental diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy can be performed using this new device in this pre-clinical model. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This new device for gasless laparoscopy allows diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy by intra-corporeal suture or mesh implantation in ex vivo canine model. The device demonstrates potential for future use in clinical cases.