[Ethical problems of extreme prematurity: results of a qualitative study with obstetricians and midwives]. / Problèmes éthiques posés par l'extrême prématurité: résultats d'une étude qualitative auprès des obstétriciens et des sages-femmes.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to explore the practices, attitudes and feelings of obstetricians and midwives in case of extreme prematurity. POPULATION AND METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted as part of a European Concerted Action (EUROBS) in 1999 and 2000 in three tertiary-care maternity units, located in three cities in the northern, southern and central areas of France respectively. Semi-structured, tape-recorded interviews were conducted and were independently analysed by two different researchers using a content analysis. All full-time obstetricians and half of the full-time midwives were eligible for the study. Overall, 17 obstetricians and 30 midwives participated. RESULTS: Both obstetricians and midwives considered that decision-making in case of very preterm births raised ethical problems concerning the mother and the foetus. Despite some birth weight and gestational age criteria defined in advance, management around delivery appeared to be decided on a case-by-case basis. At birth, the neonatologists made the decisions. They were perceived as more inclined than the obstetrical team to initiate intensive care. If the child was born alive, intensive care was started, knowing that it could be withdrawn later, if appropriate. Parents were sometimes involved in decision-making during pregnancy, less frequently at birth or after birth. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Compared with obstetricians, midwives tended to have a less favourable perception of the neonatologists' practices, and to deplore the lack of parental information and involvement in decision-making. Decisions about the obstetrical management and resuscitation of extremely preterm infants are essentially always made on a case-by-case basis. Parents are sometimes involved in decision-making. Midwives express serious concerns about the current practices.

Ethical decision-making for extremely preterm deliveries: results of a qualitative survey among obstetricians and midwives.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the practices, attitudes and feelings of obstetricians and midwives in cases of extreme prematurity. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted as part of a European Concerted Action (EUROBS) in three tertiary-care maternity units, located in three cities in the northern, southern and central areas of France. Semi-structured interviews lasted an average of 60 min and were tape-recorded. They were independently analyzed by two different researchers using a content analysis. All full-time obstetricians and half of the full-time midwives were eligible for the study. Overall, 17 obstetricians and 30 midwives participated. RESULTS: Both obstetricians and midwives considered that decision-making in case of very preterm births raised ethical problems concerning the mother and the fetus. Despite some birth weight and gestational age criteria defined in advance, management around delivery appeared to be decided on a case-by-case basis. At birth, the neonatologists made the decisions. They were perceived as being more inclined than the obstetric team to initiate intensive care. If the child was born alive, intensive care was started, in the knowledge that it could be withdrawn later, if appropriate. Parents were sometimes involved in decision-making during pregnancy, in particular when there was no emergency situation. Compared with obstetricians, midwives tended to have a less favorable perception of the neonatologists' practices, and to report less parental involvement in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions about the obstetric management and resuscitation of extremely preterm infants are usually made on a case-by-case basis. Parents are sometimes involved in decision-making. Midwives express serious concerns about the current practices.

Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among physicians and midwives.

OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at exploring the conflicts and ethical problems experienced by professionals involved in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy (TOP) in order to improve the understanding of decision-making processes and medical practices in the field of prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: Qualitative study with in-depth tape-recorded interviews conducted in three tertiary care maternity units in France, between May 1999 and March 2000. All full-time obstetricians and half of the full-time midwives were contacted. Seventeen obstetricians and 30 midwives participated (three refusals, five missing). Interviews were transcribed and analysed successively by two different researchers. RESULTS: All respondents stated that prenatal diagnosis and TOP raised important ethical dilemmas, the most frequent being request for abortion in case of minor anomalies. They pointed out the inability of our society to appropriately care for disabled children and the risk of eugenic pressures. The decisions and practices in prenatal diagnosis should be debated throughout society. All respondents reported that their unit did not have protocols for deciding when a TOP was justifiable. The transmission of information to the women appeared to be a problematic area. Moral conflicts and emotional distress were frequently expressed, especially by midwives who mentioned the need for more discussions and support groups in their department. CONCLUSION: Health professionals involved in prenatal diagnosis face complex ethical dilemmas which raise important personal conflicts. A need for more resources for counselling women and for open debate about the consequences of the current practices clearly emerged.

[Ethical decisions making in neonatal intensive care. Survey among nursing staff in 2 French centers]. / Les prises de décisions éthiques en réanimation néonatale. Enquête auprès des soignants de deux centres français.

A European Concerted Action, Euronic, has been set up to study the attitudes and self-reported practices of the staff working in neonatal intensive care units about parent's information and ethical decisionmaking. This paper presents the results of a preliminary qualitative survey conducted in two French units and including 23 physicians and nurses. The answers indicate that withdrawal of treatments are part of their practices. Parents are never directly involved in the decision-making process. The decision to withdraw life sustaining treatments generate psychological distress among the caregivers. Nurses consider that they are more emotionally involved with the baby and the parents. They express concerns about painful treatments and life-prolonging therapies. Most respondents believe that an ethical committee would be of little help in the decision-making process and that the actual legislation should not be modified as it gives obligation for more in-depth consideration of each case.

Identification of specific amphipathic alpha-helical sequence of human apolipoprotein A-IV involved in lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activation.

To investigate the structure-function relationship of human apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV), several deletion mutants of this protein were constructed by sequentially removing pairs of 22-residue repeats, potentially having an amphipathic alpha-helical conformation. The mutants, produced as recombinant poly-histidine-tagged apolipoproteins (t-apo) in Escherichia coli, assembled with phosphatidylcholine (i.e. dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine, palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine, or egg lecithin) as did native apoA-IV. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) cofactor function, measured as cholesterol esterification occurring when t-apo-phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol complexes were incubated with purified enzyme, decreased significantly when pairs of repeats between residues 117 and 248 were deleted and most markedly when residues 117-160 were deleted. LCAT cofactor activity decreased by 90 and 75%, respectively, when egg lecithin or palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine was used to form the particles with the delta aa 117-160 mutant. Thus, on the basis of deletion scanning of t-apo, residues 117-160 seem to be involved in the LCAT cofactor function of apoA-IV.