Spring-Assisted Surgery of Unilambdoid Craniosynostosis.

Craniosynostosis is traditionally treated with extensive cranial vault reconstructions (CVRs). Although less invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy, have been successful, they also present difficulties. An alternative method is distraction osteogenesis using either manually controlled devices or specially designed springs. In this study, the authors provide the first comparison of spring-assisted surgery (SAS) with CVR for the treatment of unilambdoid synostosis (ULS). Fourteen consecutive patients (8 CVR and 6 SAS) treated for ULS at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2005 and 2018 were included. Skull shape and deviations were evaluated using previously defined measurement points on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans preoperatively, at spring removal, and at 3 years of age. Posterior and middle cranial fossa (PCF and MCF, respectively), skull-base cant, facial twist, and mastoid bulge (MB) were measured, and clinical data were obtained from chart reviews. The results indicated that at the 3-year follow-up, PCF, MCF, and MB improved in both groups, with no significant difference in outcome observed between methods. In the SAS group, duration of operation [61±27 min (mean±SD)] and perioperative bleeding (3.5±2.8 mL/kg body weight) were both significantly lower relative to the CVR group (P<0.05). These findings showed that both SAS and CVR resulted in similar improvements in treating ULS, although neither produced complete normalization of skull shape. The results suggest that early diagnosis and operation allow less extensive SAS to be performed without adversely affecting the results.

Improved Facial and Skull-Base Symmetry following Osteotomy and Distraction of Unilateral Coronal Synostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) results in a surgically demanding deformation, as the deformity is asymmetric in the calvaria but also presents with facial scoliosis and orbital dystopia. Traditional cranioplasties correct the forehead but have little effect on the face and orbits. In this article, the authors describe a consecutive series of patients operated on for UCS with osteotomy of the fused suture combined with distraction osteogenesis. METHODS: Fourteen patients (mean age, 8.0 months; range, 4.3 to 16.6 months) were included in this study. The authors measured and compared the orbital dystopia angle, anterior cranial fossa deviation, and anterior cranial fossa cant between preoperative computed tomography results and those at distractor removal. RESULTS: Blood loss was 6.1 mL/kg (range, 2.0 to 15.2 mL/kg), and length of stay was 4.4 days (range, 3.0 to 6.0 days). The authors observed significant improvements in the median orbital dystopia angle from 9.8 degrees (95% CI, 7.0 to 12.6 degrees) to 1.1 degrees (95% CI, -1.5 to 3.7 degrees) ( P < 0.001), anterior cranial fossa deviation from 12.9 degrees (95% CI, 9.2 to 16.6 degrees) to 4.7 degrees (95% CI, 1.5 to 7.9 degrees) ( P < 0.001), and anterior cranial fossa cant from 2.5 degrees (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.5 degrees) to 1.7 degrees (95% CI, 0.0 to 3.4 degrees) ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Osteotomy combined with a distractor for UCS straightened the face and relieved orbital dystopia by affecting the nose angle relative to the orbits, correcting the deviation of the cranial base in the anterior fossa, and lowering the orbit on the affected side. Furthermore, this technique demonstrated a favorable morbidity profile with low perioperative bleeding and a short inpatient period, suggesting its potential to improve the surgical treatment of UCS. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Correction of Unicoronal Synostosis With Springs: Two Patients With Improved Facial Symmetry.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical correction of unicoronal synostosis (UCS) entails extensive cranioplasties which do not address facial scoliosis. This paper presents the first results with springs that motivated the shift from extensive cranioplasties to dynamic techniques for surgical correction of UCS. METHODS: Two cases of UCS were operated with a linear osteotomy combined with springs. The deviation in facial symmetry (orbital dystopia angle) and skull base angles were measured on pre and postoperative computed tomography scans until 3 years of age. RESULTS: The facial scoliosis was corrected. At spring removal, the orbital dystopia angle had gone from a 9.2 to 13.2-degree deviation preoperatively to a 0.5 to 0.9-degree overcorrection compared with the ideal 0-degree deviation. Also, the skull base deviation improved. CONCLUSION: Linear osteotomy combined with springs corrects the facial scoliosis in UCS. These cases indicate that dynamic methods may be beneficial for improving the results of surgical correction of UCS.

Springs Produce Favorable Morphological Outcomes Relative to H-craniectomy According to a Two-center Comparison of Matched Cases.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. METHODS: Comparisons were performed using available pre- and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the two craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform two different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs (Gothenburg) and H-craniectomy (Renier's technique; Uppsala). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index (CI), and age. CI, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of pre- and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires two operations, the mean total operation time was similar for both methods. Of the three complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, two were spring-related. Importantly, the compiled analysis of changes in CI and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphological correction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in CI and total and partial ICVs over time.

Circulating Brain-Injury Markers After Surgery for Craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: Historically, there have been few quantitative methods for effectively evaluating outcomes after surgery for craniosynostosis. In this prospective study, we assessed a novel approach for detecting possible postsurgery brain injury in patients with craniosynostosis. METHODS: We included consecutive patients operated on for sagittal (pi-plasty or craniotomy combined with springs) or metopic (frontal remodeling) synostosis at the Craniofacial Unit at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, from January 2019 to September 2020. Plasma concentrations of the brain-injury biomarkers neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and tau were measured immediately before induction of anesthesia, immediately before and after surgery, and on the first and the third postoperative days using single-molecule array assays. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients included, 44 underwent craniotomy combined with springs for sagittal synostosis, 10 underwent pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis, and 20 underwent frontal remodeling for metopic synostosis. Compared with baseline, GFAP level showed a maximal significant increase at day 1 after frontal remodeling for metopic synostosis and pi-plasty (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.003, respectively). By contrast, craniotomy combined with springs for sagittal synostosis showed no increase in GFAP. For neurofilament light, we found a maximal significant increase at day 3 after surgery for all procedures, with significantly higher levels observed after frontal remodeling and pi-plasty compared with craniotomy combined with springs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These represent the first results showing significantly increased plasma levels of brain-injury biomarkers after surgery for craniosynostosis. Furthermore, we found that more extensive cranial vault procedures resulted in higher levels of these biomarkers relative to less extensive procedures.

The value of genome-wide analysis in craniosynostosis.

Background: This study assessed the diagnostic yield of high-throughput sequencing methods in a cohort of craniosynostosis (CS) patients not presenting causal variants identified through previous targeted analysis. Methods: Whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing (WGS/WES) was performed in a cohort of 59 patients (from 57 families) assessed by retrospective phenotyping as having syndromic or nonsyndromic CS. Results: A syndromic form was identified in 51% of the unrelated cases. A genetic cause was identified in 38% of syndromic cases, with novel variants detected in FGFR2 (a rare Alu insertion), TWIST1, TCF12, KIAA0586, HDAC9, FOXP1, and NSD2. Additionally, we report two patients with rare recurrent variants in KAT6A and YY1 as well as two patients with structural genomic aberrations: one with a 22q13 duplication and one with a complex rearrangement involving chromosome 2 (2p25 duplication including SOX11 and deletion of 2q22). Moreover, we identified potentially relevant variants in 87% of the remaining families with no previously detected causal variants, including novel variants in ADAMTSL4, ASH1L, ATRX, C2CD3, CHD5, ERF, H4C5, IFT122, IFT140, KDM6B, KMT2D, LTBP1, MAP3K7, NOTCH2, NSD1, SOS1, SPRY1, POLR2A, PRRX1, RECQL4, TAB2, TAOK1, TET3, TGFBR1, TCF20, and ZBTB20. Conclusion: These results confirm WGS/WES as a powerful diagnostic tool capable of either targeted in silico or broad genomic analysis depending on phenotypic presentation (e.g., classical or unusual forms of syndromic CS).

Incidence of Non-Syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis in Sweden.

ABSTRACT: Premature craniosynostosis is a rare condition, with a wide range of incidence estimations in the literature. The aim of this study was to establish the current incidence among the Swedish population. Since the surgical care for these children is centralized to the 2 centers of Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Uppsala University Hospital, the 2 craniofacial hospital registries were examined for surgically treated children, all having a computed tomography verified diagnosis. Results show an incidence of 7.7 cases per 10,000 live births, including 0.60/10,000 syndromic craniosynostosis. Due to information programs among health care staff and a system for early diagnosis through rapid communication, these results seem to mirror the true incidence of craniosynostosis in the Swedish population. The updated incidence data will facilitate healthcare planning and make future studies of possible changes in craniosynostosis incidence more accurate.

Comparisons of Intracranial Volume and Cephalic Index After Correction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis With Either Two or Three Springs.

ABSTRACT: In this retrospective study, the authors determined changes in intracranial volume (ICV) and cephalic index (CI) in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis and operated with craniotomy combined with either 2 or 3 springs. The authors included patients (n = 112) with complete follow-up that had undergone surgical correction for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis with craniotomy combined with springs between 2008 and 2017. All patients underwent computed tomography examination preoperative, at the time of spring extraction, and at 3 years of age. Intracranial volume was measured using a semiautomatic MATLAB program, and CI was calculated as the width/length of the skull. The authors found that craniotomy combined with 2 springs increased the ICV from a preoperative value of 792 ±â€Š113 mL (mean ±â€Šstandard deviation) to 1298 ±â€Š181 mL at 3 years of age and increased the CI from 72.1 ±â€Š4.1 to 74.6 ±â€Š4.3, whereas craniotomy combined with 3 springs increased the ICV from 779 ±â€Š128 mL to 1283 ±â€Š136 mL and the CI from 70.7 ±â€Š4.3 to 74.8 ±â€Š3.7. The relative increase in ICV was 65 ±â€Š21% in the two-spring group and 68 ±â€Š34% in the three-spring group (P value = 0.559), and the relative increase in CI was 3.6 ±â€Š3.3% in the two-spring group as compared with 6.0 ±â€Š5.0% in the three-spring group (P = 0.004). These findings demonstrated that use of 3 springs resulted in additional absolute and relative CI-specific effects as compared with 2 springs during the time when the springs were in place, with this effect maintained at 3 years of age.

In search of a single standardised system for reporting complications in craniofacial surgery: a comparison of three different classifications.

Comparing complication rates between centres is difficult due to the lack of unanimous criteria regarding what adverse events should be defined as complications and how these events should be compiled. This study analysed all adverse events in a cohort of craniofacial (CF) operations over a 10-year period and applied three different scales (Clavien-Dindo, Leeds and Oxford) for systematic comparison. A total of 1023 consecutive CF procedures in 641 patients was identified. The Clavien-Dindo scale captured 74 complications in 74 procedures (7.2%), whereas the Leeds and Oxford scales captured 163 complications in 134 procedures (13.1%) and 85 complications in 83 procedures (8.1%), respectively. The Clavien-Dindo scale appeared less suitable for CF surgery, because it is predominantly adapted to severe complications and also regards blood transfusion as a complication. The Leeds scale provided a detailed picture of all complications, as well as minor events, whereas the Oxford scale captured all major complications well but applied less accurate definitions for the minor events. Our findings contribute to the benchmarking of complications between CF centres and suggest that both the Leeds and the Oxford scale appear relevant, depending on the emphasis required for major and minor complications and inter-centre audits, respectively.

Perinatal complications in patients with unisutural craniosynostosis: An international multicentre retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Craniosynostosis may lead to hampered fetal head molding and birth complications. To study the interaction between single suture craniosynostosis and delivery complications, an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All infants born between 2006 and 2012 in the Netherlands and Sweden with sagittal or metopic suture synostosis were included. All births were included as a reference population. The primary outcome measure was rate of medically assisted labor. The secondary outcomes included method of conception, term of birth and fetal position. RESULTS: We included 152 trigonocephaly patients, 272 scaphocephaly patients and 1.954.141 controls. A higher rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) was found in patients with trigonocephaly (13%) and scaphocephaly (7%) compared to controls (3%, p < 0.001). Scaphocephaly resulted in more postterm births (8% vs 4%, p < 0.001). Trigonocephaly patients showed more preterm births (11% vs 6%, p < 0.001), breech position was more frequent (10% vs 4%, p = 0.003) and labor was more often induced. Rate of assisted delivery, including cesarean section, was significantly higher in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Scaphocephaly leads to more postterm births and an increased rate of cesarean sections. Trigonocephaly is related to ART, and in addition higher rates of breech position and cesarean section are found. Prenatal detection of single suture craniosynostosis could improve perinatal care.

Temporal Deformity Objectively Measured Before and After Surgery for Metopic Synostosis: Retrusion Rather than Hollowing.

The temporal contour deformity typical of metopic synostosis is often referred to as temporal hollowing, but has not been quantitatively defined. This deformity is present before surgery and remains to a varying extent at long-term follow-up. The present study aimed to objectively evaluate the degree of this contour deformity in metopic synostosis before and after surgical correction.All children surgically treated for metopic synostosis at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2002 and 2014 (n = 120) with appropriate computed tomography scans (n = 160) performed preoperatively and/or at follow-up at 3 years of age were included. Depending on age, 1 of 2 surgical techniques was used. Children presenting before the age of 6 months were treated with frontal remodeling in combination with a spring (S group), whereas children older than 6 months were treated with a bone transplant (BT group). The bony temporal deformity was measured with a semiautomatic MATLAB program and patients were compared to sex- and age-matched controls.The deformity was significantly reduced in both groups (P < 0.001). In the S group, it was reduced from a mean ±â€Šstandard deviation of 3.6 ±â€Š1.9% to 1.0 ±â€Š1.2% and in the BT group, it was reduced from 3.3% ±â€Š1.4% to 1.1% ±â€Š0.8%.The contour deformity in metopic synostosis is present both before and after surgery and should therefore be termed temporal retrusion (TR). This assessment method enables objective comparison of TR before and after surgical correction and is a potential tool to evaluate TR in metopic synostosis.

The Degree of Surgical Frontal Volume Correction in Metopic Synostosis Determines Long-Term Outcomes.

Metopic synostosis results in a keel-shaped forehead, reduced frontal intracranial volume (ICV), and lower frontal to total volume ratio. The ratio improves with cranioplasty, but at 3 years of age, the ratio is still not normalized when compared to that in normal children. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a low frontal to total ICV ratio at 3 years of age was due to relapse or insufficient correction.All children surgically treated for metopic synostosis in combination with a spring at Sahlgrenska University Hospital with subsequent spring extraction between 2002 and 2008 (n = 20) were included. A MATLAB program was used to measure frontal and total ICV.Preoperatively, the frontal to total ICV ratio was 9.8 ±â€Š1.3% (mean ±â€Šstandard deviation). At spring removal, 6 months after cranioplasty, the ratio had increased to 11.8 ±â€Š2.4%. At 3 years of age, the ratio was 11.6 ±â€Š1.9%. In age-matched normal children, the ratio was 14.4 ±â€Š1.9% preoperatively, 15.3 ±â€Š2.2% at time of spring extraction, and 13.4 ±â€Š1.4% at 3 years of age.Cranioplasty thus improved the frontal to total ICV ratio, but did not normalize it. The ratio did not change from 6 months after the cranioplasty to 3 years of age. These results indicate that a more pronounced frontal volume correction during cranioplasty is necessary to achieve a normalized distribution of ICV in metopic synostosis.

Comparison Between Two Different Isolated Craniosynostosis Techniques: Does It Affect Cranial Bone Growth?

INTRODUCTION: Craniosynostosis is a premature closure of a cranial suture. Cranioplasty is indicated to correct skull deformity, relieve increased intracranial pressure, and promote homogenous cranial growth. Different techniques have been adopted to achieve optimal outcomes. Although surgical benefits are widely accepted, this intervention might also affect cranial skeletal growth. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective case-control study including patients operated for isolated metopic or sagittal synostosis. These patients had undergone a computed tomography (CT) scan before surgery and/or at 3 years of age postoperatively. These were operated between 2002 and 2012. Intracranial volume was measured using a MATLAB application. The control group was age and sex-matched individuals who had CT scans for trauma or neurological indications. All results with P value <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included in the study with a preoperative CT scan (143 sagittal synostosis and 42 metopic synostosis). Postoperatively 160 patients were identified including 103 sagittal synostosis and 57 metopic synostosis. These patients were compared to 414 controls. There was a statistically significant reduction in intracranial volume (ICV) in patients operated for metopic synostosis with both techniques. It also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in ICV in patients with sagittal synostosis operated with Pi-plasty and a nonsignificant difference in ICV in patients operated with strip craniotomy and springs. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, these measurements of ICV have revealed that extensive cranioplasties for premature craniosynostosis can lead to minor but significant growth restriction and reduced ICV at long-term follow-up.

A new quantitative image-based method for evaluation of bony temporal hollowing in metopic synostosis.

OBJECTIVE: Premature craniosynostosis is a congenital disorder causing a skull deformity. For both functional and cosmetic reasons, the deformity is surgically treated with a cranioplasty before the age of 1 year. Temporal hollowing is a common and undesirable remaining deformity after cranioplasty for metopic synostosis. The most common method to determine the degree of temporal hollowing is subjective judgement of the temporal region. The aim of the present project was to develop a quantitative semi-automatic computer tool for objective measurement of bony temporal hollowing. METHODS: Using MATLAB, a tool was developed to segment computed tomography images, defining the outermost contour. The images were dorsally limited to the widest point of the head. In each case, a sex- and age-matched control was identified and the contours compared. The bony temporal hollowing of the cases was calculated. RESULTS: The intra-user coefficient of variation (CV) was 5.0% (95% CI = 4.2%-6.2%) and the inter-user CV was 3.0% (95% CI = 2.1%-8.6%). For clinical testing purposes, the tool was used in 14 patients, seven of whom had been operated on with a spring-assisted cranioplasty and seven with a cranioplasty using a bone graft. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study presents a new tool for objective measurement of the surgical result after cranioplasty for metopic synostosis.

Acute transfer of superficial radial nerve to the medial nerve: case report.

Distal nerve transfers have proven to be an important addition to the armamentarium for reconstruction of peripheral nerve injuries. As new nerve transfer procedures are developed, the indications for their uses continue to broaden. We report a case of a 77-year-old male who had a 9-cm-long gap of the median nerve after experiencing an avulsion injury to his right forearm. This was successfully treated by transferring superficial radial nerve to the median nerve at the carpal tunnel level, thus restoring thumb, index, and first web sensation. Our report emphasizes that nerve transfers in the emergency setting may be the treatment of first choice in cases where conventional nerve grafting is known to result in poorer outcomes such as in long nerve gaps or in the elderly patient population.