Effect of liver injury on prognosis and treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Liver injury is common in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), although its effect on patient outcomes has not been well studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of liver injury on the prognosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, data on 109 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were extracted and analyzed. The primary composite end-point event was the use of mechanical ventilation or death. RESULTS: At admission, of the 109 patients enrolled, 56 patients (51.4%) were diagnosed with severe disease, and 39 (35.8%) presented with liver injury, which mainly manifested as elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) accompanied simultaneously by an increase in the level of γ-glutamyl transferase. A primary composite end-point event occurred in 21 patients (19.3%). Liver injury was more prevalent in patients with severe disease than in those with non-severe disease (46.4% vs. 24.5%, P=0.017). However, there was no significant difference found between severe and non-severe patients in the use of mechanical ventilation, mortality, hospital stay, or use and dosage of glucocorticoids between individuals with and without liver injury (all P>0.05). The degree of disease severity (OR =7.833, 95% CI, 1.834-31.212, P=0.005) and presence of any coexisting illness (OR =4.736, 95% CI, 1.305-17.186, P=0.018) were predictable risk factors for primary composite end-point events, whereas liver injury had no significance in this aspect (OR =0.549, 95% CI, 0.477-5.156, P=0.459). CONCLUSIONS: Liver injury was more common in severe cases of COVID-19 pneumonia than in non-severe cases. However, liver injury had no negative effect on the prognosis and treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Clinical significance of cyclophilin a expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the expression of cyclophilin A (CypA) in esophageal tissues and its clinical significance. METHOD: Expression of CypA was detected in 236 esophageal cancer tissues and 236 normal tissues by using an immunohistochemical method, and the relationship between CypA expression and clinical outcomes was observed. RESULTS: There were 166 patients with high expression of CypA (70.23%) and a higher expression in 69.3% of males and 73.3% in females. The CypA expression was irrelevant to age, tumor location, lymph node metastasis, and tumor differentiation degree. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the expression of CypA was associated with the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The poor prognosis of esophageal cancer patients was associated with high expression of CypA.

Expression and prognostic roles of TRPV5 and TRPV6 in non-small cell lung cancer after curative resection.

PURPOSE: We investigated the expression of epithelial Ca2+ channel transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) 5 and 6 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assessed their prognostic role in patients after surgical resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2009, 145 patients who had undergone surgical resection of NSCLCs were enrolled in the study. Patient clinical characteristics were retrospectively reviewed. Fresh tumor samples as well as peritumor tissues were analyzed for TRPV5/6 expression using immune-histochemistry (IHC) and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Patients were grouped based on their TRPV5 and TRPV6 levels in the tumor tissues, followed up after surgery, and statistically analyzed to examine the prognostic roles of TRPV5 and TRPV6 on patients' survival after surgical resection of NSCLCs. RESULTS: Using IHC, among the 145 patients who had undergone surgical resection of NSCLCs, strong protein expression (grade ≥ 2) of TRPV5 and TRPV6 was observed in a lower percentage of primary tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues of same patients. Similar findings were obtained with the RT-PCR test for mRNA levels. Decreased overall mRNA levels of TRPV5 and TRPV6 were associated with a worse overall survival rate (p=0.004 and p=0.003 respectively) and shorter recurrence-free survival (p?0.001 and p?0.001 respectively). The combining effect of TRPV5 and TRPV6 on survival was further investigated using multivariate analysis. The results showed that a combination of low expression of TRPV5 and TRPV6 could be an independent predictor of poor recurrence-free survival (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased expression of TRPV5/6 in tumor tissues was observed in NSCLC patients and was associated with shorter median survival time after surgical resection. Combined expression of TRPV5 and TRPV6 in tumor tissues demonstrated promising prognostic value in NSCLC patients.

[Evaluation of safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: From January 2005 to March 2012, 260 patients with esophageal carcinoma received thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE group), while 322 patients underwent conventional open esophagectomy (OE group). Operative procedures, perioperative complications, reoperation, readmission to intensive care unit (ICU), and perioperative mortality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with OE group, TE group possessed less thoracic operative time [(105±30) min vs. (112±41) min, P=0.000], less blood loss [(95±48) ml vs. (107±44) ml, P=0.002], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(14.3±7.5) d vs. (16.9±9.5) d, P=0.000] and more lymph node harvest from thorax [(13.5±5.0) vs. (11.6±4.7), P=0.000]. The total perioperative complication rate was lower in TE group than that of OE group (34.6% vs. 45.0%, P=0.011), as well as perioperative mortality (0.8% vs. 3.4%, P=0.032). Lower rate of readmission to ICU (5.4% vs. 10.6%, P=0.024) was found in the TE group as compared to the OE group, while the reoperation rate was comparable (1.5% vs. 2.5%, P=0.425). CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is advantageous than open procedure in terms of surgical safety.

Prognostic role of Twist, Slug, and Foxc2 expression in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer after curative resection.

UNLABELLED: By using immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays of 137 cases, we evaluated the prognostic power of a 3-marker epithelial-mesenchymal transition­related model in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent radical surgical resection. The Twist/Slug/Foxc2 coexpression model accurately prognosticated these patients and may be helpful in refining current treatment strategy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. Only about 60% of patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be cured by surgery alone. Current clinical and molecular markers are inadequate prognosticators. We developed a 3-marker model that closely approximates survival probability of patients with stage I NSCLC. METHODS: Expression of Twist, Slug, and Foxc2 was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays that contained paired tumor and peritumoral lung tissue from 137 patients who underwent surgical resection for stage I NSCLC. The prognostic value of Twist, Slug, and Foxc2, and the cumulative effects of the 3 markers on survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Increased expression of Twist, Slug, and Foxc2 was observed in 38.0%, 18.2%, and 27.7% of primary tumors, respectively. Overexpression of Twist, Slug, and Foxc2 in stage I NSCLC was associated with a worse overall survival (P = .001, P = .002, P < .001, respectively) and correlated with a shorter recurrence-free survival (P < .001, P = .001, P < .001 respectively). The cumulative influence of these markers on outcome was analyzed; a combination of more than 2 positive markers was an independent predictor of recurrence-free and overall survival (P = .002 and P = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Twist/Slug/Foxc2 model is useful in predicting survival of stage I NSCLC and may be helpful in refining current treatment strategy.

[Comparison of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in decubitus position with prone position].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy between two different surgical approaches for thoracoscopic esophagectomy including left lateral decubitus position and prone position. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2009, 88 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy were enrolled in this study. Among them, 52 patients were placed in decubitus position and 36 patients were placed in prone position. RESULTS: No conversion to thoracotomy occurred in either group. The operative time was shorter in the prone group than that in the decubitus group (70 ± 20 min vs. 82 ± 17 min, P<0.01). Blood loss during operation was less in the prone group(100 ± 52 ml vs. 139 ± 54 ml, P<0.01). More lymph nodes were harvested from chest in the prone group(12.2 ± 6.2 vs. 8.6 ± 4.3, P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in morbidity. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position is associated with better exposure of surgical filed, shorter operative time, less blood loss, and more extensive lymph node dissection as compared to decubitus position.