Elongation of the brachial plexus after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an anatomical study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming more extended and its clinical results are good or excellent according to the literature. The main biomechanical characteristic of RSA is that it lowers and medializes the centre of rotation of the shoulder causing an arm lengthening. Although the number of neurological complications is low (5%), there are more neurophysiological changes in the brachial plexus with RSA than with the anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. The main goal of this study was to quantify the lengthening of the terminal branches of the brachial plexus suffered after RSA implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 Embalmed cadavers were analysed. Four distances using bone references were employed to measure the lengthening of the arm and subacromial space. The brachial plexus and its terminal branches (radial, axillary, ulnar, musculocutaneous and median nerves) and the axillary artery, were identified and marked. Measurements were made to determine the change of position of the neurovascular structures, the arm lengthening and the lengthening of each nerve before and after the implantation of RSA. Two models of RSA were used: SMR®(Lima) and Delta Xtend®(DePuy-Synthes). RESULTS: The mean arm elongation was 10.5 mm. The subacromial space suffers an elongation of 20.5-29.8%. All the neurovascular structures suffered elongation: median nerve 23.1%, musculocutaneous nerve 22.1%, ulnar nerve 19%, radial nerve 17%, axillary nerve 12-14.5%, axillary artery 24.8%. There were no differences in the results between the types of prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its design, the RSA causes an arm lengthening which is reflected by the elongation of the neurovascular structures of the arm.

Description and relationships of the parotid gland levels proposed by the European Salivary Gland Society staging system: an anatomical study.

OBJECTIVES: To perform an anatomical study to analyze the size, weight, and the relationships of the parotid levels proposed by the European Salivary Gland Society (ESGS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anatomical dissections of the parotid region in 19 human specimens were performed. All dissections were systematically carried out to study the dimensions and weight of each level. We also studied the facial nerve distribution between the different levels and the relative position of the facial nerve main trunk and parotid duct in regard to the Frankfort line plane. RESULTS: The facial nerve trunk and the parotid duct were identified in all the 19 specimens, which made it feasible to define the 4 principal levels of the parotid gland body (levels I-IV). Level V was identified in 9 out of 19 dissections (47.5%). For the whole gland, the mean for the height and width dimensions were 66.37 mm and 46.84 mm, respectively, and it weighted 18.13 g. In terms of relative weight regarding the whole gland, level II was always the heaviest, representing from 41 to 47% of the gland's weight, depending on the presence of level V. Levels I and III represent almost the same amount of relative weight as they range from 20 to 22% for each one. Level IV was the lightest body level representing 8-10% of the whole, and when present, level V represented less than 5% of the whole parotid weight. The temporal and zygomatic terminal branches were always found between the cranial levels, whereas the cervical and marginal nerves lie in all cases between the caudal levels. The buccal branches had multiple ramifications that lie between both cranial and caudal levels in 47% of the cases, being found exclusively between cranial levels in 21% and between the caudal levels in the remaining 32%. CONCLUSION: As traditionally reported, the caudal superficial portion of the gland represents the most voluminous portion of the gland, being labeled in our classification as level II. Levels I and III represent similar amounts of gland, though presenting a significantly different morphological disposition. Level IV is the smallest portion of the body gland and level V, when present represents a scarce 5% of the whole body gland weight. The ESGS levels have a clear anatomical basis and the basic references needed to define them are always present.

Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice.

AIM: the aim of this study has been to evaluate the relevance of gross human anatomy in daily clinical practice and to compare it to that of other basic sciences (biochemistry, bioethics, cytohistology, microbiology, pharmacology, physiology, psychology). MATERIALS AND METHODS: a total of 1250 questionnaires were distributed among 38 different medical speciality professionals. Answers were analyzed taking into account speciality (medical, surgery and others), professional status (training physician or staff member) and professional experience. RESULTS: the response rate was 42.9% (n=536). Gross human anatomy was considered the most relevant basic discipline for surgical specialists, while pharmacology and physiology were most relevant for medical specialists. Knowledge of anatomy was also considered fundamental for understanding neurological or musculoskeletal disorders. In undergraduate programmes, the most important focuses in teaching anatomy were radiological, topographical and functional anatomy followed by systematic anatomy. In daily medical practice anatomy was considered basic for physical examination, symptom interpretation and interpretation of radiological images. When professional status or professional experience was considered, small variations were shown and there were no significant differences related to gender or community. CONCLUSION: our results underline the relevance of basic sciences (gross anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology) in daily professional activity. Evidence-based studies such as ours, lend greater credibility and objectivity to the role of gross anatomy in the undergraduate training of health professionals and should help to establish a more appropriate curriculum for future professionals.