A Technique of Multiple Corneal Allogeneic Ring Segments Prepared from a Single Corneal Graft: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: To describe a novel technique for preparing multiple corneal allogeneic ring segments (CAIRS) from a single corneal graft using femtosecond laser technology. METHODS: This is a case series of 10 eyes from 10 patients with keratoconus who underwent FS-assisted CAIRS implantation using corneas from 4 donors at the Hospital Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild-Noémie de Rothschild institute. A preoperative and postoperative examination was performed at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month. Anterior segment OCT and corneal tomography with aberrometric and pachymetric analyses were performed at each visit. Visual, refractive, and topographic parameters were extracted. The thickness and width of implanted CAIRS were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients were classified according to keratoconus severity: group A (maximal keratometry Kmax <75D) and group B (Kmax >75D). At 1 month postoperatively, both groups A and B showed a significant decrease in mean keratometry by 4.78 ± 1.57D and 12.87 ± 4.62D, respectively. Total and higher order aberrations decreased by 5.66 ± 4.55 and 0.65 ± 1.54 in group A and by 9.45 ± 9.15 and 0.49 ± 1.39 in group B, respectively. The corrected distance visual acuity improved by 4.8 ± 1.7 lines in group A. Visual improvement was not significant in group B. One eye in group B exhibited acute rejection and required explantation. CONCLUSIONS: FS-assisted multiple CAIRS implantation using a single corneal graft maximizes the utilization of viable corneal tissue. CAIRS implantation is an effective and biocompatible therapeutic alternative, particularly in cases of moderate to advanced keratoconus with Kmax <75D.

A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a simplified method to approximate constants minimizing the standard deviation (SD) and the root mean square (RMS) of the prediction error in single-optimized intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. Methods: The study introduces analytical formulas to determine the optimal constant value for minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power calculation formulas. These formulas were tested against various datasets containing biometric measurements from cataractous populations and included 10,330 eyes and 4 different IOL models. The study evaluated the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing the outcomes with those obtained using traditional reference methods. Results: In optimizing IOL constants, minor differences between reference and estimated A-constants were found, with the maximum deviation at -0.086 (SD, SRK/T, and Vivinex) and -0.003 (RMS, PEARL DGS, and Vivinex). The largest discrepancy for third-generation formulas was -0.027 mm (SD, Haigis, and Vivinex) and 0.002 mm (RMS, Hoffer Q, and PCB00/SN60WF). Maximum RMS differences were -0.021 and +0.021, both involving Hoffer Q. Post-minimization, the largest mean prediction error was 0.726 diopters (D; SD) and 0.043 D (RMS), with the highest SD and RMS after adjustments at 0.529 D and 0.875 D, respectively, indicating effective minimization strategies. Conclusions: The study simplifies the process of minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power predictions, offering a valuable tool for clinicians. However, it also underscores the complexity of achieving balanced optimization and suggests the need for further research in this area. Translational Relevance: The study presents a novel, clinically practical approach for optimizing IOL power calculations.

Investigating the topographic effect of epithelium in myopic eyes with subtle topographic preoperative abnormalities.

PURPOSE: To explore the topographic impact of the epithelium in Keratoconus Suspected (KCS) and in "Normal" Placido classified corneas. SETTING: Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Anterior corneal specular Placido topography using OPD-Scan® II (NIDEK, Gammagori, Japan) was performed in 97 eyes of 67 patients undergoing PRK for myopia, before and after epithelium removal. The differences in axial keratometry, asphericity and astigmatism were computed. RESULTS: After epithelial peeling, some Placido-normal classified corneas became KCS. Therefore, we have subdivided this group into two groups: one of normal classified corneas which stayed normal after epithelium removal (Group NN), and one of corneas that became KCS classified (Group NK).The mean difference in axial mean keratometry in the third central millimeter rings was +0.50 ± 0.24 D, 0.69 ± 0.31 D and 0.49 ± 0.35 D and the mean difference in the magnitude of epithelial induced astigmatism in the first central millimetre ring was 0.37 D x 89° (positive cylinder), 0.54 D 86° and 0.52 D 86° respectively in Group NN, NK and KK (KCS corneas that stayed KCS). These differences were significant (p< 0.0001). Preoperative keratometry was the only predictive factor differentiating Group NN from NK (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The epithelial layer tended to reduce the magnitude of the Bowman layer's astigmatism, prolateness and keratometry, more importantly in Group NK. In KK group we found a similar trend as in normal eyes (Group NN). The epithelium would be able to mask Bowman layer's irregularities until a certain degree of severity.

Technique of corneal allogenic ring segment preparation using femtosecond laser: preclinical study on human corneal grafts.

PURPOSE: To describe a new technique for preparing corneal allogenic ring segments (CAIRSs) using femtosecond laser technology. SETTING: Hospital Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild-Noémie de Rothschild institute, Paris, France. DESIGN: Preclinical study conducted on human corneal grafts. METHODS: The corneal grafts were mounted on an artificial chamber pressurizer (ACP) with preset constant pressure, and the FSL was used to create a circular annulus with specific dimensions. The resulting CAIRSs were analyzed for their thickness and width after air drying. RESULTS: A total of 25 CAIRSs were prepared using the FSL. The mean width and thickness of the CAIRSs were 803 ± 77 µm and 83 ± 16 µm, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in width among the various quadrants of each CAIRS or between different CAIRSs. Significantly thicker CAIRSs were obtained with a higher ACP pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of CAIRS preparation using FSL technology and controlled artificial anterior chamber pressure demonstrated reproducibility and precision. This approach holds the potential for customizing and personalizing CAIRSs based on individual corneal characteristics.

Intra-Observer and Inter-Observer Variability of Intraocular Lens Measurements Using an Interferometry Metrology Device.

The NIMO TEMPO (Lambda-X, Nivelles, Belgium) is a novel, user-friendly and compact device designed for in vitro optical analysis of refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs). This device analyzes the IOL wavefront and generates a synthetic eye model for numerical computation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the precision of this innovative device. Intra- and inter-observer variability were calculated using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) after conducting ten measurements of eight different IOL models, with each measurement being repeated by three distinct operators (resulting in a total of 30 measurements for each IOL). The device demonstrated satisfactory intra- and inter-observer variability in evaluating IOL power and modulation transfer function (MTF) profiles, with values of 0.066 and 0.078 diopters for IOL power and 0.018 and 0.019 for MTF measurements, respectively. Furthermore, this hybrid optical and numerical in vitro IOL wavefront analyzer appears to have several advantages over conventional optical bench devices. It reduces the need for operator manipulation, and allows for numerical modeling of various optical environments, including cornea models and apertures. In conclusion, this novel metrology device designed for refractive and diffractive IOLs appears to provide a satisfactory precision, making it a promising tool in the field of IOL metrology.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Descemet Stripping Only: Data Up to 7 Years Postoperatively.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report long-term follow-up of eyes undergoing Descemet stripping only (DSO). METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 26 eyes of 20 patients undergoing DSO between December 2015 and November 2022. Eligibility criteria included peripheral endothelial cell count (ECC) >1000 cells/mm2 and symptoms caused by central guttata. Patients underwent a central circular 4-mm descemetorhexis using a reverse Sinskey hook and a pair of descemetorhexis forceps using a peeling technique. Three parameters were measured before surgery and at last follow-up: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and ECC measured centrally and at the periphery. RESULTS: The mean age was 73 ± 9 years [52-90 years]. The average follow-up period was 23.7 ± 24.8 months [3-84]. Twenty-two eyes responded to DSO with 20 female eyes (91%) and 2 male eyes (9%). The mean postoperative BCVA improved from 0.3 ± 0.17 logMAR to 0.09 ± 0.13 logMAR (P value <0.05). The mean postoperative CCT decreased from 588 ± 41 µm to 546 ± 50 µm (P-value <0.05). The mean postoperative central ECC was 780 ± 257 cells/mm2 [484-1500]. Peripheral ECC decreased postoperatively (1837 ± 407 cells/mm2 preoperatively to 864 ± 340 cells/mm2 postoperatively, P value >0.05). Peripheral endothelial cell polymegathism was stable (average of 26.8% ± 6.8% preoperatively and 30.2% ± 14% postoperatively). Average peripheral endothelial cells polymorphism decreased postoperatively (63.1 ± 20.5% preoperatively to 33% ± 25% postoperatively, P value >0.05). Four eyes did not show improvement after DSO and underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgery. There were 3 men (75%) and 1 women (25%). The preoperative trend was for nonresponders to have lower BCVA, higher CCT, more abnormal peripheral polymorphism, and polymegathism. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study, with up to 7 years follow up, demonstrate the durability of DSO.

Impact of Single Constant Optimization on the Precision of IOL Power Calculation.

Purpose: The primary objective of this research is to examine how precision in intraocular lens calculation formulas can be impacted by zeroing the mean error through adjustments in the effective lens position value. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate how this modification influences outcomes differently based on the source of the prediction error. Methods: In order to analyze the impact of individual variables on the standard deviation, the study maintained all variables constant except for one at a time. Subsequently, variations were introduced to specific parameters, such as corneal curvature radius, keratometric refractive index, axial length, and predicted implant position. Results: According to our findings, when zeroing the mean error is applied to correct for inaccuracies in corneal power estimation, it results in a significant and exponential rise in standard deviation, thus adversely affecting the formula's precision. However, when zeroing is employed to compensate for prediction errors stemming from axial length measurements or predicted implant position, the effect on precision is minimal or potentially beneficial. Conclusions: The study highlights the potential risks associated with the indiscriminate but necessary zeroing of prediction errors in implant power calculation formulas. The impact on formula precision greatly depends on the source of the error, underscoring the importance of error source when analyzing variations in the standard deviation of the prediction error after zeroing. Translational Relevance: Our study contributes to the ongoing effort to enhance the accuracy and reliability of these formulas, thereby improving the surgical outcomes for cataract patients.

The Development of a Thick-Lens Post-Myopic Laser Vision Correction Intraocular Lens Calculation Formula.

PURPOSE: To describe the development of the post-myopic laser vision correction (LVC) version of the PEARL-DGS intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula and to evaluate its outcomes on an independent test set. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center case series. METHODS: A modified lens position prediction algorithm was designed along with methods to predict the posterior corneal curvature radius and correct the corneal power measurement error. A different set of previously operated eyes that underwent LVC was used to evaluate the prediction precision of the post-LVC formula. RESULTS: Post-LVC PEARL-DGS formula significantly reduced mean absolute error of prediction in comparison to Haigis-L, Shammas, and American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) average formulas (P < .001). It exhibited similar postoperative refractive precision as the Barrett True-K No History formula (P = .61). CONCLUSION: The post-LVC formula development process described in this article performed as well as the state-of-the-art post-LVC formula on the present test set. Further studies are required to assess its efficacy in other independent sets.

Discrimination between keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal eyes using a novel OCT-based tomographer.

PURPOSE: To combine objective machine-derived corneal parameters obtained with new swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) tomographer (Anterion) to differentiate between normal (N), keratoconus (KC) and forme fruste KC (FFKC). SETTING: Laser Center, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: 281 eyes of 281 patients were included and divided into 3 groups: N (n = 156), FFKC (n = 43), and KC (n = 82). Eyes were included in each group based on objective evaluation using Nidek Corneal Navigator, and subjective evaluation by authors. The SS-OCT system provided anterior and posterior corneal surface and pachymetry derived variables. The training set was composed of 143 eyes (95 N, 43 FFKC). Discriminant analysis was used to determine the group of an observation based on a set of variables. The obtained formula was tested in the validation set composed of 61 N and 82 KC. RESULTS: Among curvature parameters, the FFKC had significantly higher irregularity index at 3 mm and 5 mm, higher inferior-superior index, higher SteepK-OppositeK index and inferiorly decentered posterior steepest keratometry. Among thickness parameters: central pachymetry, thinnest pachymetry, percentage of thickness increase from center to periphery, and inferior decentration of the thinnest point were statistically different between groups. Combination of multiple variables into a discriminant function (F1) included 5 parameters and reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.95 (sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 98.5%) for detection of FFKC. F1 differentiates N from KC with AUROC = 0.99 (sensitivity = 99%, specificity = 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Combining anterior and posterior curvatures variables along with pachymetric data obtained from SS-OCT allowed automated detection of early KC and KC with very good accuracy (87% and 99.5% respectively).

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with cornea press technique and implantation of a Carlevale scleral-fixated intraocular lens.

Purpose: We describe a combined Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) using the Cornea-press (C-Press) technique, with implantation of a new sutureless, scleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL) (Carlevale, Soleko), in a case of bullous keratopathy and IOL mispositioning. Observations: Two scleral pockets were created along two scleral radial incisions, 180° apart, followed by two 23 G sclerotomies at the pockets' sites. After removal of the dislocated IOL through a corneoscleral incision, posterior vitrectomy was completed. The Carlevale IOL was injected into the anterior chamber (AC) and placed above the iris. The haptics were then externalized using opening distal forceps through the sclerotomies, and the plugs were secured in the scleral pockets. DMEK was then performed using the "C-press" technique, where corneal indentation allowed to artificially shallow the AC to ensure successful graft unrolling. Fifteen months postoperatively, the cornea was clear, the Carlevale IOL well positioned, and the patient's vision improved. Conclusions and importance: DMEK using the C-Press technique, combined with a sutureless, scleral-fixated IOL such as the Carlevale in a single procedure, may be a safe and effective option to restore vision in case of bullous keratopathy and dislocated IOL.

Theoretical Impact of Intraocular Lens Design Variations on the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculations.

To ascertain the theoretical impact of optical design variations of the intraocular lens (IOL) on the accuracy of IOL power formulas based on a single lens constant using a thick lens eye model. This impact was also simulated before and after optimization. We modeled 70 thick-lens pseudophakic eyes implanted with IOLs of symmetrical optical design and power comprised between 0.50 D and 35 D in 0.5-step increments. Modifications of the shape factor resulting in variations in the anterior and posterior radii of an IOL were made, keeping the central thickness and paraxial powers static. Geometry data from three IOL models were also used. Corresponding postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) were computed for different IOL powers and assimilated to a prediction error of the formula due to the sole change in optical design alone. Formula accuracy was studied before and after zeroization on a uniform and non-uniform realistic IOL power distribution. The impact of the incremental change in optic design variability depended on the IOL power. Design modifications theoretically induce an increase in the standard deviation (SD), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square (RMS) of the error. The values of these parameters reduce dramatically after zeroization. While the variations in optical design can affect refractive outcomes, especially in short eyes, the zeroization of the mean error theoretically reduces the impact of the IOL's design and power on the accuracy of IOL power calculation.

A Simplified Method to Minimize Systematic Bias of Single-Optimized Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas.

PURPOSE: To provide a simplified method to optimize lens constants to zero the mean prediction error (ME) of an intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula, without the need to program the formula itself, by exploring the influence of IOL and corneal power on the refractive impact of variations in effective lens position. DESIGN: Theoretical development of an optimized formula and retrospective clinical evaluation on documented datasets. METHODS: Retrospective data from 8878 patients with cataracts with pre- and postoperative measurements available using 4 IOL models and 6 IOL power calculation formulas were examined. A schematic eye model was used to study the impact of small variations in effective lens position (ELP) on the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction. The impact of keratometry (K) and IOL power (P) on SE was investigated. A theoretical thick lens model was used to devise a formula to zero the average prediction error of an IOL power calculation formula. This was achieved by incrementing the predicted ELP, which could then be translated into an increment in the IOL constant. This method was tested on documented real-life postoperative datasets, using different IOL models and single-constant optimized IOL calculation formulas. RESULTS: For small variations in ELP, there was an exponential relationship between IOL power and the resultant postoperative refractive variation. The ELP adjustment necessary to zero the ME equated to a ratio between the ME and the mean of the following expression: 0.0006*(P2+2K*P) on the considered datasets. The accuracy of the values obtained using this formula was confirmed on documented postoperative datasets, and on published and nonpublished formulas. CONCLUSION: The proposed method allows surgeons without special expertise to optimize an IOL constant to nullify the ME on a documented dataset without coding the different formulas. The influence of individual eyes is proportional to the squared power of the implanted IOL.

Theoretical Relationship Between the Anterior-Posterior Corneal Curvature Ratio, Keratometric Index, and Estimated Total Corneal Power.

PURPOSE: To predict the relationships between the keratometric index value that would match the total Gaussian corneal power and its related variables: anterior and posterior radii of curvature of the cornea, anterior-posterior corneal radius ratio (APR), and central corneal thickness. METHODS: The relationship between the APR and the keratometric index was approximated by calculating the analytical expression for the theoretical value of the keratometric index, which would make the keratometric power of the cornea equal to the total paraxial Gaussian power of the cornea. RESULTS: The study of the impact of variations in the radius of anterior and posterior curvature and central corneal thickness showed that the difference between exact and approximated best-matching theoretical keratometric index was less than 0.001 for all of the performed simulations. This translated to a variation in the total corneal power estimation of less than ±0.128 diopters. After refractive surgery, the estimated optimal keratometric index value is a function of the preoperative anterior keratometry, the preoperative APR, and the delivered correction. The larger the magnitude of myopic corrections, the greater the increase in postoperative APR value. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to estimate the most compatible value of the keratometric index that allows simulated keratometric power to equal the total Gaussian corneal power. The obtained equations enable the evaluation of the impact of corneal variables such as the APR on the ideal keratometric index value. The use of 1.3375 for the keratometric index results in an overestimation of the total corneal power in most clinical situations. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(4):266-272.].

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty-Induced Refractive Shift and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty-Induced Intraocular Lens Calculation Error.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms leading to the refractive shift and intraocular lens calculation error induced by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), using ocular biometry and corneal elevation tomography data. METHODS: This is a retrospective, monocentric cohort study. Eyes which underwent uncomplicated DMEK surgery with available pre-DMEK and post-DMEK Scheimpflug rotating camera data (Pentacam, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) were considered for inclusion with an age-matched control group of healthy corneas. Cataract surgery data were collected for triple-DMEK cases. DMEK-induced refractive shift (DIRS) and intraocular lens calculation error (DICE) were calculated. Pearson r correlation coefficient was calculated between each corneal parameter variation and both DIRS and DICE. RESULTS: DIRS was calculable for 49 eyes from 43 patients. It was 30.61% neutral, 53.06% hyperopic (36.73% > 1D), and 16.32% myopic (6.12% > 1 D). DICE was calculable for 30 eyes of 26 patients: It was 46.67% neutral, 40.00% hyperopic (10.00% > 1D), and 13.33% myopic (3.33% > 1D). DIRS and DICE were mainly associated with variations in PRC/ARC ratio, anterior average radii of curvature (ARC), posterior average radii of curvature (PRC), and posterior Q. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ARC variations, PRC/ARC ratio variations, PRC variations, and posterior Q variations are the most influential parameters for both DIRS and DICE. We suggest that a distinction between those different phenomenons, both currently described as "hyperopic shift" in the literature, should be made by researchers and clinicians.

Theoretical Relationship Among Effective Lens Position, Predicted Refraction, and Corneal and Intraocular Lens Power in a Pseudophakic Eye Model.

Purpose: To ascertain the theoretical impact of anatomical variations in the effective lens position (ELP) of the intraocular lens (IOL) in a thick lens eye model. The impact of optimization of IOL power formulas based on a single lens constant was also simulated. Methods: A schematic eye model was designed and manipulated to reflect changes in the ELP while keeping the optical design of the IOL unchanged. Corresponding relationships among variations in ELP, postoperative spherical equivalent refraction, and required IOL power adjustment to attain target refractions were computed for differing corneal powers (38 diopters [D], 43 D, and 48 D) with IOL power ranging from 1 to 35 D. Results: The change in ELP required to compensate for various systematic biases increased dramatically with low-power IOLs (less than 10 D) and was proportional to the magnitude of the change in refraction. The theoretical impact of the variation in ELP on postoperative refraction was nonlinear and highly dependent on the optical power of the IOL. The concomitant variations in IOL power and refraction at the spectacle plane, induced by varying the ELP, were linearly related. The influence of the corneal power was minimal. Conclusions: The consequences of variations in the lens constant mainly concern eyes receiving high-power IOLs. The compensation of a systematic bias by a constant increment of the ELP may induce a nonsystematic modification of the predicted IOL power, according to the biometric characteristics of the eyes studied. Translational Relevance: Optimizing IOL power formulas by altering the ELP may induce nonsystematic modification of the predicted IOL power.

Fourteen years follow-up of a stable unilateral Keratoconus: unique case report of clinical, tomographical and biomechanical stability.

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus (KC) is a noninflammatory corneal ectatic disorder. In 2015, the Global Consensus on Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases agreed that the pathophysiology of KC includes environmental, biomechanical, genetic, and biochemical disorders on one hand, and that true unilateral KC does not exist on the other hand. However, with the increasingly advancements in detection methods, we report the first case of a stable unilateral keratoconus with the longest follow up period of 14 years (2006-2020). We used topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical values for both eyes over the years to confirm the diagnosis, which has never been done before. Our study focuses on a single patient therefore it illustrates the mere possibility that unilateral keratoconus exists. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 19-year-old male with no previous ocular or general health conditions who presented to our clinic in November 2006 for incidental finding of decreased vision of the right eye (OD) on a routine examination. Topographies, tomographies, and biomechanical analysis of both eyes were obtained and showed a unilateral right keratoconus at the time. Patient admitted to unilateral right eye rubbing. Although we cannot prove that previous eye rubbing alone led to these initial symptoms, he was advised to stop rubbing and was followed up without any intervention for fourteen years during which topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical values for both eyes remained stable, proving for the first time that unilateral KC could exist. CONCLUSION: We think that the data we are presenting is important because acknowledging that true unilateral keratoconus exists questions the genetic or primary biomechanical etiology of keratoconus versus the secondary biomechanical etiologies like eye rubbing. Our report also shows the importance of corneal biomechanics in detecting early changes. This is important to detect early, prevent progression, and tailor treatment.

Management of Anterior Stromal Necrosis After Polymethylmethacrylate ICRS: Explantation Versus Exchange With Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments.

PURPOSE: To evaluate management of keratoconic eyes with anterior stromal necrosis overlying the intracorneal ring segment (ICRS), by either ICRS explantation alone or exchange with corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS). METHODS: Among 643 Intacs SK (Additional Technology, Inc) inserted at one institutional center, 16 eyes (15 patients) with overlying spontaneous anterior stromal necrosis were identified. Data included size of stromal defect and refractive and topographical findings before ICRS insertion, before anterior stromal necrosis, and 6 months after intervention. RESULTS: The 10-year incidence of anterior stromal necrosis after femtosecond laser-assisted ICRS insertion was 5.5%. Eight eyes underwent ICRS removal only and 8 eyes had ICRS exchanged with CAIRS. In the first group, CDVA worsened from 0.14 before melt to 0.28 logMAR after removal (P = .10), simulated keratometry (SimK) and maximum axial keratometry (Kmax) increased from 44.73 to 46.34 diopters (D) (P = .14) and from 49.23 to 52.26 D (P = .14), respectively, and coma worsened from 0.87 to 1.52 D (P = .02). In the CAIRS group, CDVA of 0.16 before melt improved to 0.11 logMAR postoperatively (P > .99), and topographic indices stabilized with SimK, Kmax, and coma mildly altering from 45.31 to 45.44 D (P > .99), from 49.25 to 49.64 D (P > .99) and from 0.87 to 0.81 D (P > .99), respectively. Whether the ICRS were explanted or exchanged, the visual and topographic mean values were better than those reported before ICRS implantation, whereas higher order aberrations in eyes without CAIRS regressed to levels before ICRS insertion. At the site of melt, thinnest residual stromal thickness averaged 327 µm with ICRS removal and 490 µm with CAIRS. Eyes with larger melt areas resulted in less optimal results with CAIRS implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience in the management of anterior stromal necrosis by exchange of polymethylmethacrylate ICRS with CAIRS seems to avoid stromal thinning and confer better visual and topographic results, which were more pronounced with thicker segments. The benefit of CAIRS in large stromal melts needs to be investigated. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(4):256-263.].

Using the First-Eye Back-Calculated Effective Lens Position to Improve Refractive Outcome of the Second Eye.

The present study is a retrospective, monocentric case series that aims to compare the second-eye IOL power calculation precision using the back-calculated lens position (LP) as a lens position predictor versus using a predetermined correction factor (CF) for thin- and thick-lens IOL calculation formulas. A set of 878 eyes from 439 patients implanted with Finevision IOLs (BVI PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) with both operated eyes was used as a training set to create Haigis-LP and PEARL-LP formulas, using the back-calculated lens position of the contralateral eye as an effective lens position (ELP) predictor. Haigis-CF, Barrett-CF, and PEARL-CF formulas using an optimized correction factor based on the prediction error of the first eye were also designed. A different set of 1500 eyes from 1500 patients operated in the same center was used to compare the basal and enhanced formula performances. The IOL power calculation for the second eye was significantly enhanced by adapting the formulas using the back-calculated ELP of the first eye or by using a correction factor based on the prediction error of the first eye, the latter giving slightly higher precision. A decrease in the mean absolute error of 0.043D was observed between the basal PEARL and the PEARL-CF formula (p < 0.001). The optimal correction factor was close to 60% of the first-eye prediction error for every formula. A fixed correction factor of 60% of the postoperative refractive error of the first operated eye improves the second-eye refractive outcome better than the methods based on the first eye's effective lens position back-calculation. A significant interocular biometric dissimilarity precludes the enhancement of the second-eye IOL power calculation according to the first-eye results.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for corneal decompensation due to migrating metallic intracorneal foreign bodies in an aphakic eye following a 39-year-old blast injury: A case report.

PURPOSE: To report the use of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) for secondary surgical removal of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) years after the trauma as migration occurred through the endothelium, damaging the endothelium, and causing corneal edema. OBSERVATIONS: We report the case of a blast injury in 1972, that led to left eye traumatic cataract managed with vitrectomy and lensectomy. Although thorough removal was attempted, some corneal and conjunctival foreign bodies remained.Despite aphakia, the patient maintained acceptable best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (0.30 LogMAR) but >30 years later, experienced visual deterioration. IOFB protruding through the Descemet membrane (DM) were seen, with extensive edema. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty was performed in an attempt to treat the endothelium and remove the foreign bodies protruding through the DM. The procedure was done uneventfully under sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) and the patient improved. Four years after the surgery, BCVA was 0.63, however, 6 years later, a new episode of migrating intracorneal foreign bodies with corneal edema reduced BCVA to 0.40. The decision was made to observe the patient, and delay a second DMEK. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Corneal decompensation caused by IOFB breaching the Descemet membrane can safely be managed with a DMEK. DMEK is feasible even in complex cases and should be attempted due to its lower risk of graft rejection and likely benefits, while saving the option of more aggressive transplantation techniques, such as penetrating keratoplasty, in cases of failure.

The PEARL-DGS Formula: The Development of an Open-source Machine Learning-based Thick IOL Calculation Formula.

PURPOSE: To describe an open-source, reproducible, step-by-step method to design sum-of-segments thick intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas, and to evaluate a formula built using this methodology. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter case series METHODS: A set of 4242 eyes implanted with Finevision IOLs (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) was used to devise the formula design process and build the formula. A different set of 677 eyes from the same center was kept separate to serve as a test set. The resulting formula was evaluated on the test set as well as another independent data set of 262 eyes. RESULTS: The lowest standard deviation (SD) of prediction errors on Set 1 were obtained with the PEARL-DGS formula (±0.382 D), followed by K6 and Olsen (±0.394 D), EVO 2.0 (±0.398 D), RBF 3.0, and BUII (±0.402 D). The formula yielding the lowest SD on Set 2 was the PEARL-DGS (±0.269 D), followed by Olsen (±0.272 D), K6 (±0.276 D), EVO 2.0 (±0.277 D), and BUII (±0.301 D). CONCLUSION: Our methodology achieved an accuracy comparable to other state-of-the-art IOL formulas. The open-source tools provided in this article could allow other researchers to reproduce our results using their own data sets, with other IOL models, population settings, biometric devices, and measured, rather than calculated, posterior corneal radius of curvature or sum-of-segments axial lengths.