Abnormal adipogenic signaling in the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells contributes to supportive microenvironment for leukemia development.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy, associated with unfavorable patient outcome, primarily due to disease relapse. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) residing in the bone marrow (BM) niche are the source of mesenchyma-derived subpopulations, including adipocytes, and osteocytes, that are critical for normal hematopoiesis. This study aimed to characterize BM-derived adipocyte/osteocyte fractions and their crosstalk with AML cells as a potential mechanism underlying leukemogenesis. METHODS: BM cell subpopulations derived from primary AML patients were evaluated using humanized ex-vivo and in-vivo models, established for this study. The models comprised AML blasts, normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and mesenchymal stromal subpopulations. ELISA, FACS analysis, colony forming unit assay, whole exome sequencing and real-time qPCR were employed to assess the differentiation capacity, genetic status, gene expression and function of these cell fractions. To explore communication pathways between AML cells and BM subpopulations, levels of signaling mediators, including cytokines and chemokines, were measured using the ProcartaPlex multiplex immunoassay. RESULTS: The study revealed deficiencies in adipogenic/osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs derived from AML patients, with adipocytes directly promoting survival and clonogenicity of AML cells in-vitro. In whole exome sequencing of BM-MSC/stromal cells, the AHNAK2 gene, associated with the stimulation of adipocyte differentiation, was found to be mutated and significantly under-expressed, implying its abnormal function in AML. The evaluation of communication pathways between AML cells and BM subpopulations demonstrated pronounced alterations in the crosstalk between these cell fractions. This was reflected by significantly elevated levels of signaling mediators cytokines/chemokines, in AML-induced adipocytes/osteocytes compared to non-induced MSCs, indicating abnormal hematopoiesis. Furthermore, in-vivo experiments using a fully humanized 3D scaffold model, showed that AML-induced adipocytes were the dominant component of the tumor microenvironment, providing preferential support to leukemia cell survival and proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: This study has disclosed direct contribution of impaired functional, genetic and molecular properties of AML patient-derived adipocytes to effective protection of AML blasts from apoptosis and to stimulation of their growth in vitro and in vivo, which overall leads to disease propagation and relapse. The detected AHNAK2 gene mutations in AML-MSCs point to their involvement in the mechanism underlying abnormal adipogenesis. Video Abstract.

High-dose thoracic radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a novel grading scale of radiation-induced lung injury for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) may be a serious complication after thoracic radiation therapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This prospective observational study sought to evaluate the utility of a novel radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) grading scale (RGS) for the prediction of RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 41 patients with NSCLC treated with thoracic RT of 60-66 Gy were analysed. CT scans were scheduled before RT, one month post-RT, and every three months thereafter for one year. Symptomatic RP was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2. RGS grading ranged from 0 to 3. The inter-observer variability of the RGS was assessed by four senior radiologists. CT scans performed 28 ± 10 days after RT were used to analyse the predictive value of the RGS. The change in the RGS severity was correlated to dosimetric parameters. RESULTS: The CT obtained one month post-RT showed RILI in 36 (88%) of patients (RGS grade 0 [5 patients], 1 [25 patients], 2 [6 patients], and 3 [5 patients]). The inter-observer agreement of the RGS grading was high (Kendall's W coefficient of concordance = 0.80, p < 0.01). Patients with RGS grades 2-3 had a significantly higher risk for development of RP (relative risk (RR): 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.7, p < 0.01) and RP symptoms within 8 weeks after RT (RR: 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-17.6, p < 0.01) compared to RGS grades 0-1. The specificity and sensitivity of the RGS grades 2-3 in predicting symptomatic RP was 100% (95% CI 80.5-100%) and 45.4% (95% CI 24.4-67.8%), respectively. Increase in RGS severity correlated to mean lung dose and the percentage of the total lung volume receiving 5 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The RGS is a simple radiologic tool associated with symptomatic RP. A validation study is warranted.

Colorectal dimensions in the general population: impact of age and gender.

PURPOSE: Constipation is among the most common gastrointestinal disorders, although, there is no generally accepted objective diagnostic criteria thereof. It has been proposed that colorectal dimensions assessed with Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may support the diagnosis, but normative data are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe colorectal dimensions in a sample of the general population and to investigate whether the dimensions were under influence by age and gender. METHODS: The maximum diameters and cross-sectional areas of the ascending colon, descending colon and rectum were determined from 119 CT scans of trauma patients (age groups from 15 to 70 years, 84 men and 35 women). A regression model was applied to explore the impact of age and gender on colorectal dimensions. RESULTS: Overall, great variations were found for all colorectal diameters and cross-sectional areas (median diameter (5% percentiles; 95% percentiles): ascending 46 (26; 63) mm; descending 29 (16; 48) mm; rectum 39 (22; 67) mm. Women had larger rectal cross-sectional areas, reflecting more rectal content, compared to men (p = 0.003). Age did not affect colorectal diameters or cross-sectional areas (all p > 0.10). CONCLUSION: Great variations of colorectal dimensions were found. Larger rectal cross-sectional areas in women could likely reflect the fact that women have increased prevalence of constipation. Future studies should take gender into consideration when evaluating colorectal dimensions.