RESUMO
Purpose The objective of this study was to explore the optimal cholesterol-lowering therapy for diabetic patients categorized as having a very high risk for future atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. The primary medications under investigation were statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (PCSK9-Is). The efficacy of different medication regimens helped to draw conclusions regarding the evolution of cholesterol management recommended under the American College of Cardiology's (ACC) 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on a cohort of patients from a large, community-based cardiology practice. Inclusion criteria specified patients aged 30-82 with a past medical history of two or more ASCVD events or one ASCVD event and at least two high-risk comorbidities. Acquired data included demographics, all lipid panels, medications used, and ASCVD events between December 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. The data were stored and encrypted on a REDCap account. Sub-group analysis was conducted on only diabetic patients, who were then categorized by medication regimen. The statistical analysis was completed using Fisher's exact test. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 102 diabetic patients met the inclusion criteria. Our primary analysis determined the percentage of patients who achieved their goals on each medication regimen. The goal was defined as a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of less than 70 mg/dL or at least a 50% reduction from baseline levels. The results are as follows: none (0%), statin (33.9%), ezetimibe (21.1%), statin + ezetimibe (73.5%), PCSK9-Is ± statin (83.3%), and PCSK9-Is and ezetimibe ± statin (100%). There proved to be a significant difference favoring all combination regimens over statins alone; however, there was no significant difference between these advanced regimens. A follow-up analysis determined if these patients were able to maintain their goals in the subsequent lipid panel after achieving their goals. The results are as follows: none (0%), statin (61.5%), ezetimibe (50%), statin + ezetimibe (77.8%), PCSK9-Is ± statin (100%), and PCSK9-Is and ezetimibe ± statin (66.6%). The only significant difference found was between PCSK9-Is ± statins and statins alone. Conclusions Our study revealed that regimens using PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe, in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy, were more effective than statin therapy alone in achieving the goal. On extended analysis, only PCSK9 inhibitors showed superior ability in terms of maintaining the goals for diabetic patients at very high risk for future ASCVD events. This implies that statins alone may be inadequate to properly treat this specific patient population. In the context of clinical practice, physicians could have heightened consideration for dual therapy consisting of maximally tolerated statins and a secondary agent in accordance with the 2018 ACC guidelines.
RESUMO
Purpose of Review: Osteoporosis management has evolved significantly over the past decade, with telehealth emerging as an effective tool to manage bone health in a growing patient population. This review explores the advantages and disadvantages of telehealth use for osteoporosis management while highlighting recent studies of clinical importance. Recent Findings: A wide variety of telehealth approaches are used today, from phone or video telemedicine appointments with physicians and advanced practice providers, to electronic systems for triage and consultation with osteoporosis specialists. Contemporary studies show that telehealth can facilitate health care access to underserved communities and enhance physician-patient communication, as well as provide patient education. However, barriers such as inexperience or lack of access to technology, suboptimal patient-clinician relationship building process, and difficulties with follow-up have limited the use of telehealth to certain situations. Summary: Telehealth has proven to be an effective resource for managing and treating osteoporosis patients. As its use continues to grow, important limitations must be accounted for to avoid lapses in care. Further research should keep these factors in mind as the use of this technology progresses.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis affecting millions of persons around the world. Painful flares and tophaceous deposits are debilitating, reduce quality of life and put strain on health-care systems. AREAS COVERED: This review provides an overview of the treatment of gout flares and lowering serum urate. First line agents are discussed with emphasis on emerging evidence. Novel therapies are also covered. EXPERT OPINION: Lifestyle modifications form a part of gout prevention. NSAIDs, colchicine, and glucocorticoids are first line agents for gout flares. The IL-1ß antagonists are highly effective for arresting flares but their cost-effectiveness render them salvage therapies. Allopurinol is an agent of first choice for urate lowering therapy. In Southeast Asian and Black populations, screening for HLA*B58:01 mutation is a cost-effective approach to decrease the occurrence of allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome. Febuxostat is another efficacious urate lowering therapy, but has received a U.S. FDA black box warning for cardiovascular safety. Novel uricosurics are a class for continued drug development; verinurad and arhalofenate are agents with future promise. For patients with recalcitrant gout, pegloticase is effective. Its immunogenicity significantly threatens the achievement of sustained urate lowering responses. Abrogating pegloticase's immunogenicity with immunomodulatory co-therapy may lend to sustained efficacy.
