The effect of recreational cannabis legalization and commercialization on substance use, mental health, and injury: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) and/or recreational cannabis commercialization (RCC) on emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths due to substance use, injury, and mental health among those aged 11 years and older. METHODS: A systematic review of six electronic databases up to February 1, 2023. Original, peer-reviewed articles with interrupted time series or before and after designs were included. Four independent reviewers screened articles and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes with 'critical' risk of bias were excluded. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (# CRD42021265183). RESULTS: After screening and risk of bias assessment, 29 studies were included which examined ED visits or hospitalizations for cannabis use or alcohol (N = 10), opioid mortality (N = 3), motor vehicle fatalities or injury (N = 11), and intentional injury/mental health (N = 5). Rates or number of cannabis-related hospitalizations increased after RCL in Canada and the USA. Immediate increases in rates of cannabis-related ED visits were found after both RCL and RCC in Canada. Rates of traffic fatalities increased after RCL and RCC in certain jurisdictions in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: RCL was associated with increased rates of cannabis-related hospitalizations. RCL and/or RCC was associated with increased rates of cannabis-related ED visits, consistently shown across sex and age groups. The effect on fatal motor vehicle incidents was mixed, with observed increases found after RCL and/or RCC. The effect of RCL or RCC on opioids, alcohol, intentional injury, and mental health is not clear. These results inform population health initiatives and international jurisdictions considering RCL implementation.

Opioid Use After Nephrectomy for Kidney Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the odds of early and prolonged post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs open surgery for nephrectomy. METHODS: For opioid-naïve patients in Ontario who underwent nephrectomy for kidney cancer (1994-2017, n = 7900), post-discharge opioid use was determined by prescriptions in the Ontario Drug Benefit database (age ≥65 years) and the Narcotics Monitoring System (all patients from 2012). Early opioid use was defined as ≥1 prescription 1-90 days after surgery. Two separate definitions of prolonged opioid use were examined: (1) prescription(s) for ≥60 days during post-operative days 90-365; (2) ≥1 prescriptions between both of: 1-90 days AND 91-180 days after surgery. Predictors of opioid use were assessed using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression, accounting for surgeon clustering. RESULTS: Overall, 67.4% of patients received early opioid prescriptions; however, prolonged use was low, ranging from 1.6 to 4.4% of patients depending on the definition. In multivariable analysis, open nephrectomy was associated with higher odds of early opioid use compared to MIS nephrectomy (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.19-1.55). Surgery type was not significantly associated with prolonged opioid use for either definition (OR 1.22, CI 0.79-1.89 and OR 1.06, CI 0.83-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-level study of patients undergoing nephrectomy for kidney cancer, patients who received open surgery were at increased odds of receiving early post-operative opioids compared to MIS. Prolonged opioid use was low overall and was not significantly with associated with type of surgery.

Oral Health and Cardiovascular Disease: Mapping Clinical Heterogeneity and Methodological Gaps.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have examined the associations between poor oral health and the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) over the past 25 y. This long history of research has resulted in a broad and heterogenous epidemiological field whose implications are difficult to understand and whose methodological gaps are hard to track. OBJECTIVES: This systematic mapping review aims to systematically map clinical heterogeneity and methodological gaps in assessing the relationship between poor oral health and CVD outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify longitudinal studies that examined the relationship between any oral health indicator and CVD outcomes. Each database was searched from its inception date and June 27, 2018. Extracted data assess the clinical heterogeneity (participants' characteristics, exposure and outcome measures, length of follow-up) and methodological gaps (availability of randomized controlled trials, utilization of time-varying exposures, propensity methods, mediation analysis, and competing risks analysis). RESULTS: Eighty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Clinical heterogeneity is evident in participants' characteristics (age, clinical status, and occupation) and in the definitions of oral health indicators and CVD outcomes. More important, a significant proportion of studies reported unclear definitions for CVD outcomes. The search strategy did not reveal any randomized controlled trials. Time-varying exposures, propensity methods, mediation analysis, and competing risks analysis are used infrequently in the identified studies. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a universally accepted conceptual framework on the association between oral health and CVD to derive more consistent definitions for oral health and CVD outcomes that are aligned with the investigated research questions. There is also a need to use emerging research methods to maximize the impact of research in this area. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Clinical heterogeneity is evident in the definitions of oral health indicators and cardiovascular disease outcomes. Propensity methods, mediation analysis, and competing risks analysis are used infrequently in the identified studies. The identified clinical heterogeneity and methodological gaps interfere with summarizing existing evidence and understanding their practical implications. Advancing the current understanding of the associations between oral health and cardiovascular disease goes hand in hand with minimizing clinical heterogeneity and closing the identified methodological gaps.