Mechanical properties of biodegradable poly-L-lactide ligament augmentation device in experimental anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The mechanical properties, including maximum load, elongation, and axial rigidity, of the biodegradable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) ligament augmentation device were investigated, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks after experimental anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair in 32 sheep. In 16 sheep the cut ACL was removed and reconstructed with the fascia lata augmented with a braided PLLA implant 3.2 mm in diameter. In 16 sheep the ACL was cut from its midportion, sutured, and then augmented with a PLLA implant. The contralateral knee served as a control. At 6 weeks the maximum loads of the reconstructed ACL in the fascia lata-PLLA and primary suture-PLLA groups were 9% and 6%, respectively, of the contralateral ACL, but they increased with time and at 48 weeks were 21% and 12%, respectively, of the control. In the fascia lata-PLLA group the increase in maximum load was evident (P < 0.05) during the follow-up period. During the first 12 weeks the axial rigidity (expressing the elasticity of the reconstruction) was poor, especially in the high-stress region corresponding to the tensile load close to the maximum load. Thereafter the axial rigidity increased, being 48% of the control in the fascia lata-PLLA group and 29% in the primary suture-PLLA group at 48 weeks. In the low-stress region between 10 N and 100 N the increase in axial rigidity in the fascia lata-PLLA group was apparent (P < 0.05) throughout the follow-up, with values of 72% of the control in the fascia lata-PLLA and 47% in the primary suture-PLLA group at 48 weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mechanical properties of biodegradable ligament augmentation device of poly(L-lactide) in vitro and in vivo.

To evaluate the mechanical properties of absorbable braided poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) fibre implants, 2.0 and 3.2 mm in diameter, maximum load defined as tensile load carrying capacity, elongation and axial rigidity were investigated after immersion in phosphate-buffered distilled water at 37 degrees C and pH 6.1 and after subcutaneous implantation in rabbit. The results confirm earlier indications that PLLA degrades faster in vivo than in vitro. The non-sterilized 2.0 mm implants lost 69% of initial tensile load carrying capacity in 46 wk in vitro. In vivo the loss of tensile load carrying capacity of the 2.0 and 3.2 mm implants was most marked between 6 to 12 wk. After 48 wk in vivo 2.0 and 3.2 mm implants retained 3 and 4% of initial tensile load carrying capacity respectively. Both in vitro and in vivo, elongation diminished in the same way as the maximum load. In vitro, mean axial rigidity of unsterilized 2.0 mm implants was 64 N during the first 34 wk but fell to 31 N at 46 wk. In vivo the initial mean axial rigidity of the 2.0 and 3.2 mm implants was 29 and 95 N respectively. At 24 wk the mean axial rigidity was 2 N in both implants.

Jodamid and metrizoic acid in carotid angiography. Comparative study of side-effects and film contrast.

To compare the side-effects and film contrast of jodamid and metrizoic acid 215 carotid angiography examinations were analyzed. To study the side-effects the pulse and blood pressure were recorded and the clinical condition of the patient was observed during the examination as well as on the subsequent day. Three neuroradiologists graded the film contrast without knowing the opinions of the others or which contrast medium had been used. No significant changes in pulse rate were recorded. A slight increase in blood pressure generally occurred immediately after the injection and a statistically significant but slight fall of blood pressure five to seven seconds after the injection. No differences were observed between the two contrast media. Injection into the common carotid artery lowered the blood pressure slightly more than injection into the internal carotid artery. No differences in clinical side-effects were noticed between the two contrast media. No irreversible side-effects were recorded. The film contrast of jodamid was significantly better than that of metrizoic acid.