Can the 72-hour rule based on "Blast/Abn Lymph" flag on Sysmex XN-10 optimize the workflow in hematology laboratory?

Despite the continuing improvement of automated blood cell counters, confirmation by blood smear examination remains the gold standard in case of anomalies. With a constant goal of standardisation, different experts committees (e.g. the French-speaking cellular hematology group (Groupe francophone d'hématologie cellulaire, GFHC and the ISLH International society for laboratory hematology) recently published criteria for microscopic analysis of blood smears. Cornet et al. evaluated the application of those criteria and propose to suppress any review for 72 hours when a "Blast/Abn lymph" flag is triggered for a sample with no abnormal cell on the microscopic review. The aims of our study were to retrospectively evaluate whether this 72-hour rule adequately operates and whether it is possible to extend the arbitrary 72-hour timeframe to 96h and 144h. To achieve this goal, 40,688 blood samples were collected from three French-speaking hospitals. 1,548 samples presented an isolated "Blast/Abn lymph" flag. Only 221 samples presented the application of the 72-hour rule at least once for our study period. We were able to extend this rule to 144 hours for 10 samples of them. All blood smears for which the rule was applied were verified and there was no abnormal cell on smears at 72 and 144 hours. In conclusion, the 72-hour rule derived from the GFHC's criteria is secure and reduces the slide review rate and thus the production costs and the turnaround time of hemogram results. Further investigations could confirm that its extension to 144 hours is also adequate.

Evaluation of the DOAC-Stop® Procedure to Overcome the Effect of DOACs on Several Thrombophilia Screening Tests.

The impact of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on laboratory assays used for thrombophilia testing (e.g., antithrombin, protein S, protein C, lupus anticoagulant and activated protein-C resistance) is a well-known issue and may cause false-positive and -negative results. Therefore, the correct interpretation of tests that are performed in patients taking DOACs is mandatory to prevent misclassification and the subsequent clinical consequences. We aimed at evaluating the efficiency of a new and simple procedure (DOAC-Stop®; Haematex Research, Hornsby, Australia) to overcome the effect of all DOACs in real-life settings and to assess the percentage of erroneous results due to the presence of DOACs on thrombophilia screening tests. For this purpose, 135 DOAC-treated patients (38 apixaban, 40 dabigatran, 15 edoxaban, and 42 rivaroxaban) and 20 control patients were enrolled. A significant drop in apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations following the DOAC-Stop® treatment was observed (74.8-8.2 ng/mL [ p < 0.0001], 95.9-4.7 ng/mL [ p < 0.0001], 102.1-8.8 ng/mL [ p = 0.001], and 111.3-7.0 ng/mL [ p < 0.0001], respectively). The DOAC-Stop® treatment was mostly effective to overcome the effect of DOACs on PTT-LA, dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) screen, and dRVVT confirm tests. Using our procedures, false-positive results due to DOACs were observed only with lupus anticoagulant tests (up to 75%) and fell to zero after the DOAC-Stop® procedure, regardless of the DOAC considered. In conclusion, the DOAC-Stop® adsorbent procedure appeared to be an effective and simple way to overcome the interference of DOAC on coagulation tests and should facilitate the interpretation of thrombophilia screening tests in patients taking DOACs.