Diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometry in detecting malignant epithelial cells in serous effusions.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometry (FCM) in detecting malignant epithelial cells in serous effusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flow cytometric assessment of 96 serous fluids (86 ascitic, 10 pleural) was performed by using epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) (in all 96 fluids) and MUC-1 (in a subgroup of 40 fluids) as epithelial markers and CD45 and CD14 as leucocyte markers. The percentage of EpCAM positivity and MUC-1 positivity was calculated in the CD14 and CD45 dual negative population by selective gating. The findings were then correlated with the defined gold standard criteria. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for EpCAM was found to be 92.06%, 96.96%, 98.31%, 86.48%, and 93.75%, respectively, while that for MUC-1 was 79.16%, 93.75%, 95%, 71.4%, and 85%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for dual positivity for EpCAM and MUC-1 was found to be 83.3%, 100%, 100%, 80%, and 90% respectively. On combining FCM with cytomorphology the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy all increased greatly to 95.3%, 100%, 100%, 91.4%, and 96.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of multicolored flow cytometric analysis in detecting epithelial malignancies in effusions specially in cases belonging to the atypia of undetermined significance and suspicious for malignancy categories and in cases with strong clinical suspicion of malignancy with negative fluid cytology. We recommend the combined use of FCM and cytology for this specific subgroup of patients in routine clinical practice for fast and accurate reporting.

Parathyroid carcinoma in a patient with primary hyperparathyroidism mimicking parathyroid adenoma.

Primary hyperparathyroidism caused by parathyroid carcinoma is extremely rare. Clinically, it is very challenging to differentiate between parathyroid carcinoma and adenoma. The correct diagnosis is made based on the histopathology of the resection specimen. This case report presents a woman in her 40s with body aches, knee joint pain, and fatigue, along with chronic kidney disease. Ultrasonography revealed a large hyperechoic lesion in the left parathyroid gland. Serum calcium, parathyroid hormone, urea, and creatinine levels were increased. The inferior parathyroid gland was surgically removed, and histopathological evaluation confirmed a diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma. Unfortunately, many patients do not undergo complete resection due to a lack of a correct diagnosis during the initial surgery.

Application of international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (ISRSFC) in effusion samples-a prospective study in an oncology setting.

INTRODUCTION: Serous fluid cytology is a cost-effective procedure that can help in the diagnosis, staging, and origin of the malignancy. Recently introduced International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (ISRSFC) standardizes the reporting of serous fluid cytology in the 5 categories: Category 1: Nondiagnostic (ND), Category 2: negative for malignancy (NFM), Category 3: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), Category 4: suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and Category 5: malignant (MAL). Here, we present our experience adopting the ISRSFC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented ISRSFC in December of 2019 at our institute and included a cohort of 555 prospective effusion samples. The pertinent surgical pathology, radiology, and clinical follow-up were also extracted to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance parameters. RESULTS: The assessment of interobserver reliability indicated substantial concordance (κ = 0.717) between the 2 investigators for serous fluid categorization. A total of 555 effusion samples were classified as follows: ND, 14 (2.5%); NFM, 394 (71%); AUS, 12 (2.2%); SFM, 13 (2.3%); and MAL, 122 (22%). The ROM for the ND, NFM, AUS, SFM, and MAL categories was 57.1%, 9.9%, 66.7%, 66.7%, and 97.2%, respectively, in peritoneal effusions and 57.1%, 7.1%, 66.7%, 100%, 100%, respectively, in pleural effusions. The ROM for NFM and MAL was 0% and 100%, respectively, in pericardial effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the proposed ISRSFC can help in achieving uniformity and reproducibility in diagnoses and also help in risk stratification in cytology. ISRSFC was successfully adopted by our cytology laboratory and clinicians, with overall diagnostic performance similar to previous studies.