The unseen impact - a deep dive into neurocognitive impairment among patients with intracranial meningiomas: a comprehensive systematic review of the literature.

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors, predominantly affecting adults, with a higher incidence in female and elderly populations. Despite their prevalence, research on neurocognitive impairment in meningioma patients remains limited compared to intra-axial tumors such as gliomas. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature on neurocognitive outcomes in meningioma patients pre- and post-surgery. Our review revealed significant disparities in reported neurocognitive outcomes, with prospective studies suggesting tumor-related factors as the primary contributors to postoperative deficits, while retrospective studies imply surgical intervention plays a significant role. Regardless of study design or specifics, most studies lack baseline preoperative neurocognitive assessments and standardized protocols for evaluating neurocognitive function. To address these gaps, we advocate for standardized neurocognitive assessment protocols, consensus on neurocognitive domains to be targeted in this population by tailored test batteries, and more prospective studies to elucidate correlations between tumor characteristics, patient attributes, surgical interventions, neurocognitive status, and planning for implementing tailored neurocognitive rehabilitation strategies early in the postoperative course which is crucial for achieving optimal long-term neurocognitive outcomes and enhancing patients' quality of life.

The Evolving Need for Neuropsychology in Neurosurgical Settings: Challenges Facing Transformative Care.

Clinical neuropsychology has been a valuable asset to neurologic surgery, contributing to lateralization and localization of pathologic brain tissue, identification of eloquent cortex, and evaluation of postoperative neuropsychological functioning. Moreover, neuropsychologists provide empirically driven interventions aimed at supporting preparation and/or recovery of neurosurgery patients. Nonetheless, several challenges may limit the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the assessment data obtained and reduce the usefulness of other neuropsychological services provided. Specifically, linguistic, cultural, educational, and other biases associated with demographic characteristics can lead to a narrowed view of an individual's life experiences, which must be confronted to fulfill the mission of ensuring that all patients have access to care that is appropriate to their needs. Instead of perceiving these challenges as insurmountable barriers, such issues can be viewed as opportunities to catalyze change and foster innovation for the future of neuropsychological care in neurosurgical settings. In addition to reviewing the possible mechanisms of these obstacles, the current article offers tangible solutions at both a macro level (e.g., discipline-wide transformations) and micro level (e.g., individualized patient-centric approaches). Outlined are practical techniques to potentially improve consensus and standardization of methods, advance and globalize research, expand representativeness of measures and practices to serve diverse individuals, and increase treatment adherence through engagement of patients and their families.

Foundations of Neuropsychology: Collaborative Care in Neurosurgery.

The disciplines of neuropsychology and neurosurgery have a history of partnership that has improved prognoses for patients with neurologic diagnoses that once had poor outcomes. This article outlines the evolution of this relationship and describes the current role that clinical neuropsychology has within a department of neurological surgery across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages of treatment. Understanding the foundations of collaboration between neuropsychology and neurosurgery contextualizes present challenges and future innovations for advancing excellence along the continuum of care for all neurosurgical patients.

Innovations in Neuropsychology: Future Applications in Neurosurgical Patient Care.

Over the last century, collaboration between clinical neuropsychologists and neurosurgeons has advanced the state of the science in both disciplines. These advances have provided the field of neuropsychology with many opportunities for innovation in the care of patients prior to, during, and following neurosurgical intervention. Beyond giving a general overview of how present-day advances in technology are being applied in the practice of neuropsychology within a neurological surgery department, this article outlines new developments that are currently unfolding. Improvements in remote platform, computer interface, "real-time" analytics, mobile devices, and immersive virtual reality have the capacity to increase the customization, precision, and accessibility of neuropsychological services. In doing so, such innovations have the potential to improve outcomes and ameliorate health care disparities.

Rehabilitation of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Long COVID: Position Statement.

Long COVID, a term used to describe ongoing symptoms after COVID-19 infection, parallels the course of other postviral syndromes. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of long COVID can be persistent and interfere with quality of life and functioning. Within the biopsychosocial framework of chronic illness, rehabilitation professionals can address the neuropsychiatric sequelae of long COVID. However, current practice models are not designed to address concurrent psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in adults living with long COVID. Thus, we present a biopsychosocial framework for long COVID and provide treatment strategies based on evidence from current literature of postviral chronic illness. These recommendations will guide rehabilitation professionals in identifying common neuropsychiatric symptoms in long COVID that can be targeted for intervention and addressing these symptoms via integrative interventions taking into account the biopsychosocial presentation of long COVID symptoms.

The Impact of Hope and Resilience on Multiple Factors in Neurosurgical Patients.

The purpose of the present article is to outline and review the impact of stable psychological characteristics on the emotional and functional outcomes of neurosurgical patients. Neurosurgical patients face adversity as inherent to their diagnoses and, consequently, experience emotional distress. Despite commonalities in diagnoses, diverse outcomes are seen post-neurosurgery, which are influenced by psychological factors. Therefore, an understanding of neurosurgical patients' behavior, thoughts, and feelings surrounding their diagnoses, informed by psychological concepts, is important for both neuropsychology and neurosurgery.

Cognitive Remediation Therapy for Brain Tumor Survivors with Cognitive Deficits.

Cognitive deficits have been widely observed in patients with primary brain tumors consequent to diagnosis and treatment. Given the early onset and the relatively long survival rate of patients, it seems pertinent to study and refine the techniques used to treat these deficits. The purpose of this article is to discuss cognitive deficits that follow neurosurgical treatment for low-grade gliomas as well as to outline a neuropsychological intervention to treat these deficits, specifically working memory and attention. Cognitive remediation therapy is a neuropsychological intervention that aims to enhance attention, working memory, and executive functioning, thereby diminishing the impact of these deficits on daily functioning. Computerized cognitive remediation training programs facilitate access to treatment through providing online participation. The authors include preliminary results of three participants who have completed the computerized training program as part of an ongoing study that is investigating the efficacy of this program in patients who have undergone treatment for low-grade gliomas. The results so far suggest some improvement in working memory and attention from baseline scores. It is the hope of the present authors to highlight the importance of this treatment in the continuity of care of brain tumor survivors.