Increasing the Accuracy of Free-Form Surface Multiaxis Milling.

This contribution deals with the accuracy of machining during free-form surface milling using various technologies. The contribution analyzes the accuracy and surface roughness of machined experimental samples using 3-axis, 3 + 2-axis, and 5-axis milling. Experimentation is focusing on the tool axis inclination angle-it is the position of the tool axis relative to the workpiece. When comparing machining accuracy during 3-axis, 3 + 2-axis, and 5-axis milling the highest accuracy (deviation ranging from 0 to 17 µm) was achieved with 5-axis simultaneous milling (inclination angles ßf = 10 to 15°, ßn = 10 to 15°). This contribution is also enriched by comparing a CAD (Computer Aided Design) model with the prediction of milled surface errors in the CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) system. This allows us to determine the size of the deviations of the calculated surfaces before the machining process. This prediction is analyzed with real measured deviations on a shaped surface-using optical three-dimensional microscope Alicona Infinite Focus G5.

Influence of Steel Structure on Machinability by Abrasive Water Jet.

Although the abrasive waterjet (AWJ) has been widely used for steel cutting for decades and there are hundreds of research papers or even books dealing with this technology, relatively little is known about the relation between the steel microstructure and the AWJ cutting efficiency. The steel microstructure can be significantly affected by heat treatment. Three different steel grades, carbon steel C45, micro-alloyed steel 37MnSi5 and low-alloy steel 30CrV9, were subjected to four different types of heat treatment: normalization annealing, soft annealing, quenching and quenching followed by tempering. Then, they were cut by an abrasive water jet, while identical cutting parameters were applied. The relations between the mechanical characteristics of heat-treated steels and the surface roughness parameters Ra, Rz and RSm were studied. A comparison of changes in the surface roughness parameters and Young modulus variation led to the conclusion that the modulus was not significantly responsible for the surface roughness. The changes of RSm did not prove any correlation to either the mechanical characteristics or the visible microstructure dimensions. The homogeneity of the steel microstructure appeared to be the most important factor for the cutting quality; the higher the difference in the hardness of the structural components in the inhomogeneous microstructure was, the higher were the roughness values. A more complex measurement and critical evaluation of the declination angle measurement compared to the surface roughness measurement are planned in future research.