RESUMO
Background: The goal of this research is to determine how well OrthAlign, a novel portable navigation system for total knee replacement, helps surgeons make accurate incisions. When comparing OrthoAlign, a portable accelerometer-based technique, to the gold standard of extramedullary jigs, the results are promising. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts in total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: This research analyzed data from a prospective cohort study. Participants in the study all had resections of the proximal tibia and distal femur using the OrthAlign portable navigations device. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients throughout the same time period who used traditional medullary alignment jigs were included as a control group. Before and after surgery, full-length standing stitch radiographs of the patient's lower limbs were acquired so that the alignment of their knees could be assessed. Results and Conclusions: In the mechanical alignment exam done following the surgery, the OrthAlign group performed substantially better than the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Patients treated with OrthoAlign had considerably improved alignment of the tibial components in the coronal plane compared to those treated manually. When comparing the OrthAlign cohort to the conventional cohort, average sagittal plane alignment of tibial components was significantly different. Yet, when comparing femoral alignment after surgery, neither the mechanical alignment nor the OrthAlign groups fared better. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups when it comes to the occurrence of outliers with postoperative mechanical axis alignment >3 degrees or tibial alignment in the coronal plane >2 degrees. Compared to OrthAlign, conventional alignment methods resulted in a higher percentage of postoperative tibial alignment in the sagittal plane (greater than 2 degrees). Patients whose femurs were misaligned by more than 2 degrees after surgery favored the OrthAlign method, albeit this was not statistically different from the control group. There was a significant reduction in tourniquet time for patients using OrthoAlign compared to those using mechanical alignment devices.
RESUMO
Background: Morbidity and mortality from tuberculosis, a significant infectious illness, are expected to rise worldwide. The projected number of new cases rose from 7.5 million in 1990 to 11.9 million in 2005, a 58.6% increase in 2011. The widespread belief that TB is no longer a public health concern is unfounded; on the contrary, the link between HIV/AIDS and antibiotic resistance has further exacerbated the crisis that already existed. Similar to the nations in sub-Saharan Africa, India is now considered a Group IV country, with an annual risk of infection between 1% and 2.5%. 2. Although 60% of TB cases occur in people who are HIV-positive, only 3-5% of cases in HIV-negative individuals are skeletal. The most frequent type of articuloskeletal tuberculosis is spinal tuberculosis. Aim: 1. The goal of this study is to evaluate the neurological outcome of anterior debridement, fusion, posterior instrumentation, and early rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injuries. 2. The goal of this study is to determine the prevalence of pressure ulcers, hypostatic pneumonia, and urinary tract infections urinary tract infections (UTIs) among these individuals. 3. The goal of this study is to determine the frequency of graft-related problems. 4. See how well these individuals are able to keep their corrected deformities from returning. Materials and Methods: Patients who had simultaneous anterior (anterior debridement and bone grafting) and posterior (posterior instrumentation and fusion) procedures were followed prospectively. Result: Thirty patients' films were examined. In addition, cord edema was suggested in 13 of the patients based on the presence of strong signal intensities there. Myelomalacia signs were seen in one patient, but he or she went on to make a complete neurological recovery. The average duration of operation was 355 minutes, and this included the time needed to position the patient for the two separate procedures. Conclusion: There was an 89.5% rate of neurological recovery with an average corrected loss of 6.98 degrees (0.20 degrees to 35.90 degrees), and the complication rate was acceptable in the group analyzed.