Antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of rebleeding in acute variceal hemorrhage: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of rebleeding in acute variceal hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients who underwent endoscopic therapy for bleeding esophageal varices were randomized into the prophylaxis group and the on-demand group. Patients in the prophylaxis group received antibiotic prophylaxis using intravenous ofloxacin till the patient resumed oral fluids, followed by oral ofloxacin tablet for a total of 7 days. In the on-demand group, antibiotics were used only when infection was evident. Patients were monitored for rebleeding and infection during the hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients in the prophylaxis group and 26 patients in the on-demand group were analyzed. The clinical characteristics in both the groups were similar. The Child-Pugh score was around 7 in both the groups. The incidence of infection was 5/30 (16.7%) in the prophylaxis group and 7/26 (26.9%) in the on-demand group (P = 0.52). The incidence of early rebleeding in the prophylaxis vs. the on-demand group was 3 vs. 5 (P = 0.69), and the incidence of late rebleeding was 6 vs. 8 (P = 0.48). The differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: The present study shows a trend toward lower rate of early and late rebleeding, infection rate and mortality in the prophylaxis group; hence, routine use of antibiotics in all such patients may not be necessary. Further studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are required to validate the usefulness of antibiotics in these patients.

Necrotizing fasciitis.

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is among the most challenging surgical infections faced by a surgeon. The difficulty in managing this entity is due to a combination of difficulty in diagnosis, and also of early as well as late management. For the patient, such a diagnosis means prolonged hospital stay, painful dressings, an extended recovery, and in some unfortunate cases even loss of limb or life. Necrotizing fasciitis is a fairly common condition in surgical practice in the Indian context resulting in a fairly large body of clinical experience. This article reviews literature on MEDLINE with the key words "necrotizing," "fasciitis," and "necrotizing infections" from 1970, as well as from articles cross referenced therein. The authors attempt to draw comparisons to their own experience in managing this condition to give an Indian perspective to the condition.

Minimizing wound contamination in a 'clean' surgery: comparison of chlorhexidine-ethanol and povidone-iodine.

PURPOSE: There is limited work analyzing the efficacy of different antiseptics in reducing wound contamination by the skin flora during hernia repair and its influence on the incidence of wound infection, which continues to be a major problem in the developing world. This study was designed to test if chlorhexidine-ethanol has superior antimicrobial efficacy compared with povidone-iodine. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, the efficacy of chlorhexidine-ethanol and povidone-iodine in the reduction of colony counts of the skin flora and the incidence of surgical site infection was compared. RESULTS: Both povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-ethanol produced significant reduction in the skin bacterial colony counts, from 18.66 x 10(2) to 2.34 x 10(2) colony-forming units with povidone-iodine (59%) and from 12.34 x 10(2) to 0.93 x 10(2) colony-forming units (82%) with chlorhexidine-ethanol. Infection rates with the use of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-ethanol groups were not significantly different (9.5 vs. 7.0; p = 0.364). The reduction in colony counts in those who developed infection was only 15.6% compared with 77.1% in those who did not develop infection. CONCLUSIONS: The antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine-ethanol and povidone-iodine is comparable in open hernia repair.

Epidemiology of hospitalized burn patients in a tertiary care hospital in South India.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological pattern of burns varies widely in different parts of the world. To suggest effective preventive measures, an insight into the pattern of injury is desirable. However, data on burn victims and outcome is limited from this part of the world. METHODS: This study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, from April 2006 to April 2007. All consecutive patients with major burns admitted for in-hospital treatment during the study period were included in the study. The data collected included age, gender, cause and mode of burns, presence or absence of inhalational injury, facial burns, time delay from burn injury to admission in the hospital, burns depth, total body surface area distribution of burns, associated injuries and co-morbid illness, microbiological profile and outcome. Inhalational injury was assessed by clinical examination as bronchoscopy was not available. RESULTS: A total of 222 consecutive patients admitted for in-hospital treatment of burn injury were included in the study. 177 patients were adults and 45 were <13 years of age. The female:male ratio was 1.7:1. In adults, 52.5% of burns were due to non-intentional injury and 43.9% were due to self-immolation. In patients <13 years of age, 95.6% of cases were due to non-intentional injury. The mean TBSA was 48.75% and 30.18% of patients had predominantly deep burns. The overall mortality was 60.8%. The predominant organisms colonizing the burn wound were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (81.1%) followed by Acinetobacter species and MRSA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors predicting survival in patients with burn injury showed that TBSA>30%, age>20 years, female gender and presence of facial injury were statistically significant as predictors of risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with burns, total body surface area involvement more than 30%, age more than 20 years, female gender and presence of facial injury are statistically significant, as predictors of poor outcome and risk of death. The strongest association was seen with facial injury, which increased the risk of death by fourfold.

Does single-dose preoperative dexamethasone minimize stress response and improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND: Stress response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is less compared with open cholecystectomy, but is still responsible for significant postoperative morbidity. Though preoperative glucocorticoids were found to be effective in reducing the response in open surgical procedures, their role in minimal access surgery is not clear. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of single-dose preoperative dexamethasone in reducing the stress response and postoperative morbidity after LC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 70 patients undergoing elective LC were randomized to receive either dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously), or placebo. The change in C-reactive protein levels after LC, pain scores at rest, and on exertion and narcotic requirements, the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), anti-emetic requirement, peak expiratory flow rate in both groups were compared. RESULTS: Dexamethasone was more effective in controlling late PONV (P=0.05). The antiemetic requirement was significantly less in the dexamethasone group (0.56 mg vs. 2.24 mg; P=0.02). Median pain scores were significantly less in the dexamethasone group at 24 hours at rest (P=0.002) and on exertion at 24 and 48 hours (P=0.03 and 0.001). Analgesic requirement was less in the test group (22.9 mg vs. 29.9 mg; P=0.054). The peak expiratory flow rate at 48 hours was higher in the dexamethasone group (315.28 vs. 285.8 l/min; P=0.04). The dexamethasone group showed significantly less elevation of C-reactive protein levels at 24 hours (7.17 microg/mL vs. 17.53 microg/mL; P=0.003) and 48 hours (10.65 microg/mL vs. 23.18 microg/mL; P=0.02) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative single-dose dexamethasone significantly reduces the pain scores, PONV, and antiemetic requirements while improving the respiratory function in the postoperative period after LC.