[Anesthetic management for electroconvulsive therapy in the patients with a history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome].

We report three patients with a history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome for whom modified electroconvulsive therapy (m-ECT) was scheduled. Two patients suffered from schizophrenia, and one suffered from depression. Their symptoms, such as hyperthermia, consciousness disturbance, myotonus, tremor, sweating, and tachycardia, improved gradually with administration of dantrolene and fluid infusion. However, their psychotic state was exacerbated. Therefore, m-ECT was scheduled. When patients were restless at the hospital ward, they were sedated with propofol and transferred to the operating room. General anesthesia was induced with thiopental 2.5-5 mg x kg(-1). After loss of consciousness, vecuronium bromide 0.01 mg x kg(-1) followed by a dose of 0.1 mg x kg(-1) was administered and ventilation was assisted using a face mask and 100% oxygen. After the ECT stimulus, the patients were sedated with propofol until full recovery from muscle relaxation. Although anesthesia time (mean 38 min) was slightly longer (19 min) than in those anesthetized with thiopental and suxamethonium chloride, m-ECT was performed safely and effectively.

[Spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for a patient with a history of severe leg pain after intrathecal dibucaine].

An 87-year-old man was scheduled for the 11th transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT). He had a history of non-active syphilis for 21 years, diabetes mellitus for 7 years, and severe emphysema. Preoperative physical examination of the lower extremities, revealed loss of knee-jerk reflex, and loss of vibratory and proprioceptive perception. Four years previously, he underwent TURBT twice under spinal anesthesia with dibucaine, which caused severe leg pain during anesthesia. Therefore, subsequent TURBTs (eight times) were performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation, which frequently caused postoperative respiratory distress. Recently, bupivacaine, less neurotoxic than dibucaine, was on the market in Japan for use in spinal anesthesia. Therefore we planned spinal anesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine, 2.0 ml. This time, he did not complain of leg pain during anesthesia, and postoperative conditions were satisfactory. We can conclude that bupivacaine is very useful for spinal anesthesia especially in patients with a history of leg pain by spinal anesthesia with dibucaine.