Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA ; 297(20): 2201-9, 2007 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17519409

RESUMO

CONTEXT: In areas where Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax coexist and treatments for the 2 species differ, misdiagnosis can lead to poor outcomes in either disease. A unified therapy effective against both species would reduce reliance on species-specific diagnosis, which in many areas is difficult to maintain. The antifolates are an important and affordable antimalarial class to which it is often assumed P vivax malaria is intrinsically resistant. OBJECTIVE: To test the relative efficacy and safety of 2 antifolate drugs against P vivax malaria and compare each with chloroquine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: An open-label randomized controlled trial comparing chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and chlorproguanil-dapsone for the treatment of P vivax malaria was conducted in eastern Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan, areas in which P vivax malaria predominates. A total of 20,410 patients older than 3 years were screened; 767 patients (315 in Pakistan and 452 in Afghanistan) with confirmed P vivax malaria were enrolled and followed up daily for 4 days, then weekly for 28 days, between March 2004 and June 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete clearance of parasites with no recrudescence by day 14. Secondary outcomes included being parasite-free by day 28, clinical failure, and anemia. RESULTS: By day 14, only 1 patient in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group had parasites. By day 28, failure rates were found in 2 of 153 patients (1.3%) in the chloroquine group, 5 of 290 patients (1.7%) in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group, and 27 of 272 patients (9.9%) in the chlorproguanil-dapsone group. Chlorproguanil-dapsone was less effective than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-17.0; P<.001) and chloroquine (adjusted OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.0-36.5; P = .004). Chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine were equivalent in efficacy at day 28 (adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.3-7.0; P = .73). Chloroquine cleared gametocytes and asexual parasites more rapidly than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or chlorproguanil-dapsone did. All drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Although chloroquine remains the drug of choice, antifolates are effective against P vivax malaria in South Asia. These drugs may be appropriate for unified treatment where species-specific diagnosis is unavailable, most likely in combination with other drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158561.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Ácido Fólico/uso terapêutico , Malária Vivax/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Afeganistão , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Dapsona/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão , Proguanil/análogos & derivados , Proguanil/uso terapêutico , Pirimetamina/uso terapêutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...