The cellular and molecular properties of capsule surrounding silicone implants in humans vary uniquely according to the tissue type adjacent to the implant.

The foreign body reaction (FBR) to biomaterials results in fibrous encapsulation. Excessive capsule fibrosis (capsular contracture) is a major challenge to the long-term stability of implants. Clinical data suggests that the tissue type in contact with silicone breast implants alters susceptibility to developing capsular contracture; however, the tissue-specific inflammatory and fibrotic characteristics of capsule have not been well characterized at the cellular and molecular level. In this study, 60 breast implant capsule samples are collected from patients and stratified by the adjacent tissue type including subcutaneous tissue, glandular breast tissue, or muscle tissue. Capsule thickness, collagen organization, immune and fibrotic cellular populations, and expression of inflammatory and fibrotic markers is quantified with histological staining, immunohistochemistry, and real-time PCR. The findings suggest there are significant differences in M1-like macrophages, CD4+ T cells, CD26+ fibroblasts, and expression of IL-1ß, IL-6, TGF-ß, and collagen type 1 depending on the tissue type abutting the implant. Subglandular breast implant capsule displays a significant increase in inflammatory and fibrotic markers. These findings suggest that the tissue microenvironment contributes uniquely to the FBR. This data could provide new avenues for research and clinical applications to improve the site-specific biocompatibility and longevity of implantable devices.

Immediate Prepectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Is Equally Safe Following Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular over the last decade. There is a paucity of data surrounding the impact of mastectomy type on clinical outcomes when comparing prepectoral immediate breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) using tissue expansion. The purpose of this study was to compare 90-day reconstructive surgical outcomes in immediate prepectoral tissue expander reconstruction between patients with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records was carried out on all patients undergoing NSM or SSM with immediate prepectoral tissue expander reconstruction without ADM, in a single institution, from June 2020 to December 2021. All complications were recorded, categorized, and statistically analyzed for significance. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (97 breasts) were studied. The mean age was 51 years old (range, 31-77). Twenty-two patients suffered complications recorded in 22 breasts (22.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in the total complications between the NSM (25.7%) and SSM (21.0%) groups or in the incidence of all major and minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction using tissue expanders without ADM has similar reconstructive outcomes in both NSM and SSM. There were no significant differences in complication rates between either groups. Breast reconstruction without ADM can confer institutional cost savings without compromising safety.

Altered Foreign Body Response at the Posterior Surface Compared to the Anterior Surface of Human Silicone Breast Implants.

Soft implantable devices are crucial to optimizing form and function for many patients. However, periprosthetic capsule fibrosis is one of the major challenges limiting the use of implants. Currently, little is understood about how spatial and temporal factors influence capsule physiology and how the local capsule environment affects the implant structure. In this work, we analyzed breast implant capsule specimens with staining, immunohistochemistry, and real-time polymerase chain reaction to investigate spatiotemporal differences in inflammation and fibrosis. We demonstrated that in comparison to the anterior capsule against the convex surface of breast implants, the posterior capsule against the flat surface of the breast implant displays several features of a dysregulated foreign body reaction including increased capsule thickness, abnormal extracellular remodeling, and infiltration of macrophages. Furthermore, the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines increased in the posterior capsule across the lifespan of the device, but not in the anterior capsule. We also analyzed the surface oxidation of breast explant samples with XPS analysis. No significant differences in surface oxidation were identified either spatially or temporally. Collectively, our results support spatiotemporal heterogeneity in inflammation and fibrosis within the breast implant capsule. These findings presented here provide a more detailed picture of the complexity of the foreign body reaction surrounding implants destined for human use and could lead to key research avenues and clinical applications to treat periprosthetic fibrosis and improve device longevity.

Topical Tranexamic Acid in Breast Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Excess fluid accumulation (seroma/hematoma) around the breast implant after reconstruction can lead to significant complications. Topical administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce fluid accumulation and reduce postoperative complications. This trial aims to investigate whether TXA-treated mastectomy pockets will exhibit less postoperative fluid production and complications. METHODS: This paired, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial enrolled patients undergoing bilateral mastectomies with immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction. In each patient, one breast was randomized to receive 3 g of TXA (100 cc), and the other received 100 cc of normal saline. The blinded solutions were soaked in the mastectomy pocket for 5 minutes before implant placement. Postoperatively, daily drain outputs, complications, and baseline demographics were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-three eligible patients, representing 106 breasts, were enrolled. All patients underwent bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomies. After randomization, TXA was placed in the right breast in 30 patients (56.6%). The use of topical TXA resulted in a mean drain output reduction of 30.5% (range, -83.6% to 26.6%). Drains on the TXA-treated breast were eligible for removal 1.4 days (range, 0 to 4 days) sooner than the control side. The TXA-treated group had three complications (5.67%) versus 15 (28.3%) in the control group (OR, 0.1920; P = 0.0129). Specifically, for operative hematomas, the TXA group had none (0%), versus three in the control group (5.7%) (OR, 0.1348; P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Soaking the mastectomy bed with 3% topical TXA before implant insertion leads to a decrease in drain output and a decrease in complications. Topical administration of TXA represents an option to decrease complications in alloplastic breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

The Radiographic "Air Sign" in Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

Timing of extubation on post-mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) surgery is critical, given that at baseline these infants have difficult airways and failed extubation requires either re-intubation of an already complex airway with a fragile, recently osteotomized mandible, or adjunctive airway measures such as CPAP that may apply unwanted pressure to the surgical site. Thus, the goal is to plan extubation when the risk of failure is minimal. Currently, there is a void in the literature addressing the timing of extubation post-MDO and no objective sign of extubation readiness has been elucidated. This study describes a simple clinical pearl to assist in the evaluation of extubation readiness in these patients. Postoperatively, we obtain weekly radiographs to assess distractor stability and advancement, and to assess for the "Air Sign". The Air Sign describes a radiolucent space (air) visualized in the oropharynx on lateral radiographs, likely indicating that the tongue based airway obstruction has been relieved by mandibular advancement.

Le moment de l'extubation est très important après une opération de l'ostéogenèse par distraction mandibulaire, car ces nourrissons ont des voies respiratoires difficiles d'accès au départ, et une extubation malavisée entraîne soit la réintubation de voies respiratoires déjà difficiles à traverser alors que l'ostéotomie récente a fragilisé la mandibule, soit des interventions respiratoires d'appoint comme la CPAP, qui peuvent exercer une pression indésirable sur la zone opératoire. Ainsi, il faut planifier l'extubation au moment où le risque d'échec est minimal. À l'heure actuelle, les publications ne précisent pas le moment de l'extubation après l'ostéogenèse par distraction mandibulaire, et aucun signe objectif n'est fixé pour établir quand le patient y est prêt. La présente étude décrit une perle clinique simple pour contribuer à évaluer si ces patients sont prêts à être extubés. Après l'opération, les chercheurs ont obtenu des radiographies hebdomadaires pour évaluer la stabilité et l'avancement du distracteur, de même que le " signe de l'air ". Celui-ci décrit un espace translucide (air) visualisé dans l'oropharynx aux radiographies latérales, probablement indicateur du soulagement de l'obstruction des voies respiratoires par la langue grâce à l'avancement de la mandibule.

Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Geometric Breast Measurements and Changes at 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral breast reconstruction has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity. However, in direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, there is no opportunity for capsular modifications before final implant insertion. Implant pocket and breast shape are thus maintained, initially, solely by the mastectomy skin flaps, and eventually, by attachments of the periprosthetic capsule. The present study aims to quantify changes in breast geometric measurements over time following DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent bilateral prepectoral DTI reconstruction performed by a single surgeon from June of 2016 to January of 2018. Patients followed for more than 2 years were included. Yearly standardized frontal photographs were analyzed, and nipple-to-midline, sternal notch-to-nipple, and midclavicle-to-lower pole measurements were obtained. Patient demographics, operative details, and complications were documented. RESULTS: A total of 72 breasts (38 women) undergoing direct-to-implant, prepectoral breast reconstruction were included in the final analysis. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 56 breasts only (78.9%) for anterior coverage. The average change in nipple-to-midline distance after 2 years decreased by 0.41 cm (range, -2.00 to 2.97 cm), sternal notch-to-nipple distance decreased by 0.62 cm (range, -4.98 to 5.4 cm), and midclavicle-to-lower pole distance decreased 0.10 cm superiorly (range, -6.07 to 3.6 cm). In breasts that underwent postmastectomy radiation therapy, the average changes were -0.08, -0.43, and -0.56 cm, respectively. No patient in this cohort had severe malposition requiring further surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides insight into geometric breast measurements following prepectoral breast reconstruction at 2-year follow-up. The minimal breast shape changes observed demonstrate the feasibility of prepectoral DTI reconstruction with or without the use of acellular dermal matrix. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Breast Implanted-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Case of Advanced Disease with Flow Cytometric Findings.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (breast implant-associated ALCL) is a recently described, distinct clinicopathological entity associated with macrotextured breast implants. The diagnostic workup of a patient suspected to have breast implant-associated ALCL includes cytological assessment of effusions and tissue biopsies of any masses or enlarged lymph nodes, with morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluation and possible flow cytometric and molecular testing. We report the case of a woman found to have breast implant-associated ALCL on fine needle aspirate and core biopsy, who on surgical resection, had extensive local disease with involvement of the resection margins and lymph nodes, requiring systemic treatment. We focus on the flow cytometric findings that identified a population of large cells on the CD30/side scatter dot plot and whose immunophenotype was consistent with breast implant-associated ALCL, highlighting the value of flow cytometry as an adjunct to morphological and immunophenotypic evaluation.

Breast Implant-Related Adverse Events During Mammography: An Assessment of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

BACKGROUND: Adverse events arising in patients with breast implants during mammography reported by the Food and Drug Administration include implant rupture, pain, and impaired visualization. However, data supporting these claims were collected in 2004, and since, newer implant generations have been developed with overall rate of implantation increasing by 48%. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to determine the current incidence of implant-related adverse events arising during mammography. METHODS: We analyzed reports regarding silicone and saline breast implants published in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database between 2008 and November 2018. Search terms included "mammogram," "mammography," "radiograph," "breast cancer screening," "breast cancer test," and "x-ray." RESULTS: Of the 20 539 implant-related adverse events available in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database, 427 were retrieved using our search strategy and 41 were related to mammography. Thirty-five of identified cases (85.4%) reported implant rupture, of which 19 (54.3%) were confirmed by a healthcare professional, 9 (25.7%) were clinically confirmed by saline implant deflation, and 7 (20.0%) were unverified reports by patients. Sixteen ruptures (45.7%) occurred with silicone implants, whereas 19 ruptures (54.3%) occurred with saline. Other adverse events included pain (29.3%), change in implant appearance (14.6%), and swelling (7.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although implant rupture, pain, change in implant appearance, and swelling may occur, minimal implant-related adverse events arise during mammography. Given the extremely low reported risk of implant rupture, this should neither prevent patients from adhering to breast cancer screening programs nor deter patients from seeking breast implants. Patients should be aware of these reported risks and discuss screening options with their breast cancer screening team.

Unlocking Performance Excellence: Review of Evidence-Based Mindful Meditation.

SUMMARY: Mindfulness has recently been implemented by advanced military combatants, firefighters, and those in other very intellectually demanding and fast-paced professions. A surgeon, similarly, is faced with many difficult challenges, whether it be a complex and meticulous surgery, extensive clinical responsibilities, or simply the challenges faced in residency. In current curricula, there is no training to introspectively deal with these stressors. Regardless of what we face in our personal lives, the lives of patients are literately in our hands. Would it not be prudent and wise to train our brain to not only deliver care to our patients but also be able to take care of us and maybe even improve our performance? Regular practice of mindfulness has been shown to decrease rates of burnout, decrease medical errors, improve sleep, and even improve surgical performance. With the ever-changing pandemic situation and increasing stressors in the hospital, mindful meditation is perfectly primed to be added to our armamentarium as surgeons and physicians. This review aims to explain how mindfulness can enhance a surgeon's performance, mindset, interactions, and execution through a review of recent scientific advancements and evidence.

Complications of Capsulectomies: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Background: Although plastic surgeons commonly perform capsulectomies for a variety of peri-prosthetic capsular conditions, the safety of capsulectomy remains unknown, and the literature lacks evidence describing its morbidity and complication rates for patients inquiring about its associated risks. Objectives: The present study aims to identify and define the complication rates associated with capsulectomies. Methods: An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was performed between the years 2015 and 2018. All information pertaining to demographics, patient-related information, surgical indications, procedure-related information, outcomes, and complications were assessed. Results: The study identified 2231 cases of surgeon-reported capsulectomies; indications most commonly reported included capsular contracture (n = 638, 28.6%) and breast implant rupture (n = 403, 18.1%). In total, 141 patients (6.32%) were hospitalized for longer than 1 postoperative day (range, 2-28 days), while the overall complication rate was 3.0% (n = 67/2231 patients). Incidence of minor complications, representing superficial surgical site infections, was 0.8%, while the major complication rate was 2.24%. These included 7 cases of deep surgical site infections (0.3%), 19 organ space infections (0.9%), and 8 cases of wound dehiscence (0.4%). Eight patients developed sepsis (0.4%); 6 patients required transfusions (0.3%); 1 case of postoperative pneumonia and 1 myocardial infarction were also identified (n = 1 each, 0.0%). The overall reoperation and readmission rates were 2.0%, representing a readmission rate of 66% among patients with complications. Conclusions: The present study provides the first estimate of the incidence of complications associated with capsulectomies. Although the NSQIP database contains significant limitations, the data presented herein describe a complication profile that plastic surgeons can share with their patients during informed consent.

Nerve Blocks in Breast Plastic Surgery: Outcomes, Complications, and Comparative Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: As plastic surgeons continue to evaluate the utility of nonopioid analgesic alternatives, nerve block use in breast plastic surgery remains limited and unstandardized, with no syntheses of the available evidence to guide consensus on optimal approach. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to evaluate the role of pectoralis nerve blocks, paravertebral nerve blocks, transversus abdominus plane blocks, and intercostal nerve blocks in flap-based breast reconstruction, prosthetic-based reconstruction, and aesthetic breast plastic surgery, independently. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles reporting on a total of 2820 patients were included in the final analysis; 1500 patients (53 percent) received nerve blocks, and 1320 (47 percent) served as controls. Outcomes and complications were stratified according to procedures performed, blocks employed, techniques of administration, and anesthetic agents used. Overall, statistically significant reductions in opioid consumption were reported in 91 percent of studies evaluated, postoperative pain in 68 percent, postanesthesia care unit stay in 67 percent, postoperative nausea and vomiting in 53 percent, and duration of hospitalization in 50 percent. Nerve blocks did not significantly alter surgery and/or anesthesia time in 83 percent of studies assessed, whereas the overall, pooled complication rate was 1.6 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Transversus abdominus plane blocks provided excellent outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction, whereas both paravertebral nerve blocks and pectoralis nerve blocks demonstrated notable efficacy and versatility in an array of reconstructive and aesthetic procedures. Ultrasound guidance may minimize block-related complications, whereas the efficacy of adjunctive postoperative infusions was proven to be limited. As newer anesthetic agents and adjuvants continue to emerge, nerve blocks are set to represent essential components of the multimodal analgesic approach in breast plastic surgery.

Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction has become an alternative to staged subpectoral expander-based reconstruction. Although the surgical safety of this technique has been shown, aesthetic limitations have not been well-described. This article reports aesthetic limitations and elucidates risk factors that may predispose patients toward developing unfavorable outcomes following direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed, identifying patients who underwent prepectoral, direct-to-implant breast reconstruction from June of 2016 to June of 2019. Aesthetic limitations assessed included capsular contracture, rippling, implant malposition, and implant flipping. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four consecutive women representing 334 breasts underwent immediate reconstruction performed by a single plastic surgeon. A midlateral incision was used in 185 breasts (55.4 percent) and the Wise pattern in 95 breasts (28.8 percent). The mean follow-up time was 30.5 months (45.3 to 18.3 months). Significant capsular contracture (grade 3 to 4) was noted in 27 breasts (8.1 percent), implant flipping in four breasts (1.2 percent), implant displacement in five breasts (1.5 percent), major rippling in nine breasts (2.7 percent), and minor rippling in 17 breasts (5.1 percent). The use of acellular dermal matrix had no significant effect on the aesthetic outcomes. In comparing breasts with postmastectomy radiation, there was a significant difference in the presence of minor rippling and capsular contracture ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This cohort represents the largest, single-surgeon, direct-to-implant prepectoral database in the literature. This report shows that aesthetic limitations were comparable to those seen with other forms of reconstruction. Complications did not differ in terms of acellular dermal matrix use. Certain factors can predispose patients to developing unfavorable aesthetic outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

"Locoregional perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: An anatomic review & quadrant algorithm".

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgeons' firm grasp of perforator anatomy allows them to be increasingly mindful of esthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and donor-site function when approaching breast reconstruction. Mindfulness of these outcomes has contributed to the widespread use of locoregional perforator flaps in post-mastectomy and post-BCS reconstruction. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was performed to identify relevant studies reporting the use of locoregional perforator flaps in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Selected manuscripts were analyzed and grouped by pedicled flap category. Articles were additionally assessed for the advantages and disadvantages of each flap and reported complications. RESULTS: Following three rounds of review, 30 of 101 (29.7%) articles were retained as specifically pertinent to the use of locoregional flaps in breast reconstruction surgery. They were categorized by locoregional perforator flap used (TDAP, LICAP, AICAP, LTAP, or IMAP). In total, the included studies reported on the use of perforator flaps in 829 patients, with complications occurring in 73 of 418 patients (17.5%). Commonly reported complications across all included studies were hematomas (n = 10), infection (n = 7), fat necrosis/steatofibrosis (n = 31), extruded expanders (n = 1), dehiscence (n = 2), seroma (n = 2), required cosmetic correction of the donor area (n = 5), flap congestion (n = 11), flap failure (n = 2), poor esthetic outcome (n = 4), grade II capsular contracture (n = 3, all of whom received postoperative radiation), and keloid scars(n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Though the available literature remains anecdotal, locoregional flap-based reconstruction may provide some benefit in post-BCS reconstruction by sparing donor-site musculature and nerve supply and by minimizing adverse events.

Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity because of its lower levels of postoperative pain and animation deformity. BREAST-Q, a well-validated patient-reported outcomes tool, was used to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life. The goal of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes at 6-month and 1-year follow-up after direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS: Sixty-nine consented adult patients undergoing a total of 110 direct-to-implant, prepectoral, postmastectomy breast reconstructions completed BREAST-Q questionnaires immediately preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. RESULTS: Mean breast satisfaction decreased nonsignificantly from 61.3 preoperatively to 58.6 at 12 months after reconstruction (p = 0.32). Psychosocial well-being improved nonsignificantly from 67.1 preoperatively to 71.1 at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.26). Physical well-being of the chest was insignificantly different, from 74.4 to 73.3 at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.62). Finally, sexual well-being similarly remained nonsignificantly changed from 60.2 preoperatively, to 59.1 at 12 months (p = 0.80). The use of acellular dermal matrix and postmastectomy radiotherapy did not have any significant effects on patient-reported outcomes. Through regression analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increased age, and incidence of rippling were found to negatively influence BREAST-Q results. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction demonstrated an overall satisfaction with their outcomes. As prepectoral breast reconstruction continues to advance and grow in popularity, patient-reported outcomes such as those presented in this study become of paramount importance in practice. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Current Advances in Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid Management.

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are caused by excessive tissue response to dermal injury due to local fibroblast proliferation and collagen overproduction. This response occurs because of pathologic wound healing due to dysregulation in the inflammatory, proliferative, and/or remodeling phase. Patients with hypertrophic scars or keloids report reduced quality of life, physical status, and psychological health. Hypertrophic scars or keloids will develop in 30 to 90% of individuals, and despite their prevalence, treatment remains a challenge. Of the treatments currently available for hypertrophic scars and keloids few have been adequately supported by studies with appropriate experimental design. Here, we aim to review the available literature to provide up-to-date information on the etiology, epidemiology, histology, pathophysiology, prevention, and management options available for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids and highlight areas where further research is required.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Mechanism of Action and Clinical Applications.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes healing by evenly applying negative pressure on the surface of the wound. The system consists of a sponge, a semiocclusive barrier, and a fluid collection system. Its effectiveness is explained by four main mechanisms of action, including macrodeformation of the tissues, drainage of extracellular inflammatory fluids, stabilization of the environment of the wound, and microdeformation. Rarely will complications linked to NPWT occur, but special care must be taken to prevent events such as toxic shock syndrome, fistulization, bleeding, and pain. New NPWT modalities have been recently developed to make NPWT suitable for a wider variety of wounds. These include NPWT with instillation therapy (NPWTi-d), different cleansing options, and application of NPWT on primarily closed incisions. Finally, vacuum-assisted wound closure therapy has been demonstrated to be efficient for various clinical settings, such as the management of diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcerations, chronic wounds, and skin grafts.