RESUMO
Background Multisystem involvement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known since the beginning of the pandemic, and post-COVID-19 sequelae have often been reported. The term 'long Covid' encompasses these signs and symptoms. The aim of our study was to study different after-effects which patients endured within 12 months after recovery from acute COVID-19 and to study the various risk predictors. Methods This was a longitudinal observational study of a cohort of 146 patients who recovered from COVID-19 illness. Patients were enrolled during the first four weeks of the onset of their illness, and a monthly follow-up assessment was done for six months that included a detailed history of persistent or new symptoms, new illnesses diagnosed, and complete biochemical, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological and psychiatric evaluation, both objective and subjective. A final follow-up was also done at the end of one year of enrolment. Based on the patient's self-reported history and our multi-system assessment, recorded sequelae were classified according to the involved organ system. These were correlated with possible risk predictors and statistically significant associations were established. Results One hundred and twenty subjects out of 146 total subjects qualified for final analysis. Pulmonary sequelae (48/120; 40%) were the most followed by psychiatric (30/120; 25%), neurological (26/120; 21.7%), and opportunistic infections (7/120; 5.8%). A total of 39/120 (32.1%) cases complained of prolonged dyspnoea. Six out of 120 i.e. 5% of study participants had new-onset diabetes. Twenty-six out of 120 (21.7%) had radiological signs of pulmonary fibrosis. Patients with co-morbidities, older age, higher body mass index, and patients with severe disease were found to be at higher risk of developing these sequelae. Poor nutrition, female gender, and hospitalization were predictors of psychiatric sequelae. Diabetes and liberal steroid use during COVID-19 management were predictors of opportunistic fungal infections. Conclusion This study evaluated post-COVID-19 sequalae in-depth both objectively and subjectively. Some specific predictors for specific sequelae were confirmed on statistical correlation. Long-term follow-up of high-risk persons is therefore recommended after the cure of COVID-19.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) may produce large amount of infectious sputum which needs to be handled carefully both in health care and household settings. As mycobacteria may survive for long duration in sputum; proper collection, disinfection and disposal is necessary to avoid potential disease transmission. We aimed to assess the efficacy of bedside disinfectant treatment of sputum produced by TB patients using easily available disinfectants that can be used both in TB wards and household settings, to sterilize the infected sputum and compared it with sputum without disinfectant treatment. METHODS: It was a prospective case control study. Sputum of total 95 patients with sputum smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis was collected in sputum containers with lids. Patients on anti-tubercular treatment for more than 2 weeks were excluded. Each patient was given 3 sterile sputum containers to expectorate, Container A containing 5% Phenol solution, Container B containing 4.8% Chloroxylenol and Container C without any disinfectant, acting as a control. Thick sputum was liquified with Mucolytic agent N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). Aliquots of the sputum were sent for culture in Lowenstein-Jensen medium on day 0 (to confirm alive mycobacteria) and on day 1 i.e., after 24 hours (to evaluate effective sterilization). Drug resistance testing was done on all grown mycobacteria. RESULTS: If the samples on day 0 did not grow mycobacteria (indicating non-viable mycobacteria) or day 1 sample grew contaminants in any of the three containers, they were excluded from the analysis (15/95). In remaining 80 patients, bacilli were alive on day 0 and remained alive even after 24 hours (day 1) in control samples (without disinfectants). The sputum was effectively disinfected resulting in no growth after 24 hours (day 1) in 71/80 (88.75%) containing 5% Phenol and 72/80 (90%) with 4.8% Chloroxylenol. The efficacy of disinfection was 71/73 (97.2%) and 72/73 (98.6%) for drug sensitive mycobacteria respectively. The mycobacteria however remained alive with these disinfectants in all 7 samples of drug-resistant mycobacteria with an efficacy of 0%. CONCLUSION: We recommend use of simple disinfectants like 5% Phenol or 4.8% Chloroxylenol for safe disposal of sputum of pulmonary tuberculosis patients. It is necessary as sputum collected without disinfection remained infectious after 24 hours. Resistance of all drug resistant mycobacteria to disinfectants was a novel chance finding. This needs further confirmatory studies.
