Additional occult cancers identified on staging breast MRI: imaging appearances and pathologic characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for staging of patients with breast cancer due to its high sensitivity in detecting additional cancers (ACs). However, the clinical impact of diagnosing and treating these cancers remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent staging MRI at The American University of Beirut Medical Centre (AUBMC) between 2012 and 2020. Pathology reports and breast MRI examinations were reviewed. Eighteen breast cancer patients with 19 pathology-proven index cancers (ICs) and 19 pathology-proven MRI-detected ACs were included. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed rank test for numerical variables were used to compare ICs to ACs. RESULTS: The ICs consisted of four ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 13 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), of which five with associated DCIS, and two invasive lobular carcinomas, (ILC) of which one with associated DCIS. ACs comprised 12 DCIS, five IDC, two with associated DCIS and two ILC, one with associated DCIS. Interval cancers were more frequently invasive whereas ACs were more frequently in situ (P = 0.021). ACs were more frequently nuclear grade 2 (P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between ICs and ACs in lesion type (P = 0.062), shape (P = 0.073), initial enhancement (P = 1), delayed enhancement (P = 0.732), hormonal receptor profile (P = 0.68) and Ki67 (P = 0.388). Among ACs, ten (53%) were larger than 10 mm of which five (26%) were invasive cancers, and five (26%) were larger than the ICs. CONCLUSIONS: ACs detected by breast MRI were more likely to be in situ and to show a nuclear grade 2. Although not reaching statistical significance, some ACs tend to be clinically significant by their type, size or nuclear grade. The impact on clinical management remains to be determined.

Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT was performed in 268 women with breast cancer, as well as ALN dissection or sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. One hundred sixty-four patients underwent US-guided FNA in combination with 18F-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities. RESULTS: Axillary 18F-FDG uptake was positive in 180 patients, and 125 patients had axillary metastases according to the final pathology obtained by ALN dissection and/or SLN dissection. Of the patients with positive 18F-FDG uptake in the axilla, 21% had false-positive results, whereas 79% were truly positive. Eighty-eight patients had negative 18F-FDG uptake in the axilla, among which 25% were false-negative. 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86.59% and a specificity of 63.46% in the assessment of ALN metastasis; on the other hand, US-guided FNA had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 87.50%. The mean primary cancer size (p = 0.04) and tumor grade (p = 0.04) in combination were the only factors associated with the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic ALNs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients was not significantly different from that of US-guided FNA. Combining 18F-FDG PET/CT with US-guided FNA or SLN biopsy could improve the diagnostic performance compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT alone.

Radiology residents from learners to teachers: A multi-centric study.

PURPOSE: The teaching role of radiology residents has seldom been evaluated, and little is known about how teaching skills of radiology residents evolve throughout their training in the absence of formal teaching guidance. Our objective is to identify residents' characteristics correlating with better teaching and compare teaching characteristics of junior and senior residents. METHOD: All seven medical schools in Lebanon were involved in this multi-centric study. A self-assessment questionnaire was sent to sixty-nine radiology residents and filled anonymously. Fifty-seven (83 %) responses were received and represent the study population. Data analysis was based on factors correlating with overall teaching effectiveness. A comparison of senior and junior residents' responses was also performed. RESULTS: Overall teaching effectiveness correlated with better knowledge, technical skills, clinical judgment, communication skills, identification and correction of learning problems, and importantly providing and receiving feedback. Senior residents rated themselves significantly better than juniors in "knowledge related to radiology" and in "technical skills" but not in "overall teaching effectiveness". Seniors did not agree on the statement "medical students make my clinical responsibilities easier". Although not reaching statistical significance, seniors showed a trend towards improving teaching skills. CONCLUSIONS: Overall teaching effectiveness is correlated with the adoption of proper skills and techniques. Despite the lack of formal teaching guidance, senior radiology residents are improving their techniques as teachers but still face difficulties in several domains.